Tolling for a new harbour crossing

An article in the NZ Herald today raises the typical old debate of whether tolls should be introduced to fund another harbour crossing. If any issue was ever likely to raise the heckles of the North Shore, this is it: Transport Agency consultants believe tolls of $6 to $8 could pay for a new Auckland harbour crossing.…
32 Comments

Council doesn’t take the bait

When NZTA released their further assessment of whether the next Waitemata Harbour Crossing should be a bridge or a tunnel (millions of dollars of public money spent on the assessment, without it even having a recommendation) I felt that the whole project really missed the point – why do we need another road-based harbour crossing?…
10 Comments

North Shore bus use booming

As I noted in a post a couple of days ago, there are significant overcrowding problems on many of the buses connecting the North Shore with the city centre. Auckland Council’s transport committee came up with a number of fairly urgent recommendations, while I also had my suggestions about how to improve the attractiveness of other North Shore bus services by making them easier to understand.…
11 Comments

North Shore rail link very popular

An interesting article in yesterday’s Herald, outlining the results of a poll into transport in Auckland: An UMR Research poll, the results of which are out today, found 79 per cent of 241 Aucklanders in favour of installing railway lines across the harbour – whether on a new bridge or through tunnels – and 18 per cent against.…
8 Comments

Just what could a new Harbour Crossing look like

I have had a brief look at a few of the documents surrounding the release of the latest harbour crossing study and came across a few images of what a new bridge may look like. First a top down view: Looks like things get pretty messy at each side where the bridge lands, so lets look at those a bit closer up, here’s the St Marys Bay side (sorry its a bit fuzzy) Wow the residents of St Marys Bay are not going to like this at all, they seem to want to extend the mess that is the CMJ right down to the waterfront and they seem to forget the whole point of the Victoria Park Tunnel was to try to minimise the impacts the motorway had on the area.…
27 Comments

The false assumption

Even though the cost-benefit ratio of both bridge (0.6) and tunnel (0.4) options for providing an additional crossing of the Waitemata are pathetically low, I actually think they’re an over-estimate. This is due to the same false assumption that afflicts the analysis of all future roading projects: That traffic numbers will keep rising If you have a look through the business case for the harbour crossings, the main justification is that – supposedly – traffic volumes will continue to rise dramatically across the harbour bridge into the future, and therefore we will need more lanes in the form of another crossing.…
11 Comments