Another roundup after a week of thunderstorms and sunny days, here’s some stuff that caught our attention this week.


This week on Greater Auckland


This post, like all our work, is brought to you by the Greater Auckland crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers and fans. If you’d like to support our work, you can join our circle of supporters here, or support us on Substack!


How to bike to work in the rain

With all of this wet weather we’ve been having, Radio NZ have taken a look at how some cyclists get around and deal with the rain.

He is in the three percent of urban New Zealanders who are considered “committed” cyclists, meaning a bike is their primary means of transport to work or getting around town. It’s fair to say that some of them might skip the bike when it’s raining or worse – snowing. However, at least some of them are determined to bike to work even when it rains because of health, or environmental conviction, or because they have no other means. And they swear that they can turn up to their place of employment in a perfectly presentable condition.

Patrick Morgan – who lives in Wellington and is not surprisingly a bike advocate – doesn’t love riding in the rain, but he does it anyway.

“It’s mainly the getting out the door that’s a disincentive, but sometimes once you’re out there it’s actually not so bad, and it can be quite enjoyable, splashing through puddles and seeing other people out there in bad weather.

“You kind of give a bit of a head tilt or a nod or a smile when you see someone else on a bike in bad weather.”

Morgan added that weather isn’t the biggest deterrent to more New Zealanders biking and biking more often, but it is limited infrastructures such as bike lanes that would increase safety.


Some facts on cycleways

The Herald’s Simon Wilson tried to put some sense and facts back into the debate about cycleways (again) after some of his colleagues railed against cycleways (again)

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown was on our new streaming service Herald NOW last week. When the interview turned to transport, he was asked one thing: what is he doing about “all the stuff that annoys people, the cycleways” for instance?

But while there are angry voices, are most people really so annoyed?

Brown told viewers: “There are other things that need to be fixed.”

…..

AT doesn’t have a strong record with cycleways. It has failed to meet its own cycleway targets in recent years and the Government’s new transport policy statement makes it difficult for new ones to be built. Only about 1% of the total transport spend in Auckland goes on cycleways, but because of the new policy and AT’s own nervousness, even that measly proportion is about to fall.

And yet, strangely, some members of the Government are keen on expensive cycleways.

Minister for Auckland (and former Transport Minister) Simeon Brown made this clear last month when he turned the first sod in the last part of Te Ara Ki Uta Ki Tai, the path of land to sea, otherwise known as the Glen Innes to Tāmaki shared path.

He called it a “great community asset” and said it would be “a beautiful place to ride”. He’s not wrong. This last section of the path will be a wide boardwalk over the edge of Hobson Bay, around the pōhutukawa that line the shore.

You can imagine the cost. At least, let’s put it this way: try doubling whatever you imagined.

I asked the minister why he was such a fan of such an expensive cycleway. Brown, remember, is a senior member of a Government that tells us all the time how relentlessly focused they are on cost-cutting. He said with a big grin that it was because it won’t take any space on the road.

And there we have it. The perceived right of drivers to the exclusive use of the roads is more important than the expense.

You’d think Finance Minister Nicola Willis would knock some heads together over that. But apparently not.


A path with no access

This week Te Ahu a Tauranga Manawatū, the new four-lane highway between to replace the Manawatu Gorge opened. Running alongside the highway is a new shared pathway. There’s one major issue with it though.

Cyclists and pedestrians have been provided with a shared pathway running the length of the Manawatū-Tararua Highway opening this week, but it will be three years before there is a safe way to get to it.

Labelled “a great disappointment” and an absence of common sense, people on foot or on bikes will have to use the same old Ashhurst Bridge with a 100kph speed limits as trucks and other vehicles.

The separate access across the Manawatū River had been a condition of the resource consents granted for the Te Ahu a Turanga Manawatū Gorge road replacement.

However, the bridge was found to be incapable of supporting clip-on lanes, and the agency back-pedalled on an early concept plan for a separate bridge when cost estimates came in around $37 million.

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi regional relationships director for the central North Island Linda Stewart told a Horizons Regional Transport Committee meeting on Tuesday a separate bridge would not open until the middle of 2028.

She said the agency was working with the Palmerston North City Council to resolve some consenting issues before developing the bridge design and starting construction in 2026.


Northland Expressway benefits don’t stack up

Speaking of highways, unsurprisingly the economic benefits promoted by those pushing to have it built don’t stack up. Newsroom reports.

A report making the case for a major highway that could consume 10 percent of the Government’s entire infrastructure budget in coming decades may overstate its economic benefits and can’t be easily verified, an independent analyst says.

The NZ Institute of Economic Research says it stands behind its work, which is not intended to be a full cost-benefit analysis of the Northland expressway.

Announcing plans last year to speed up work on the project, which will connect Auckland to Northland via a four-lane highway, the then transport minister Simeon Brown cited the findings of an NZIER report commissioned by the Northland Corporate Group, made up of several self-described “Northland business heavyweights”.

According to the report, the expressway could lead to a $1.2 billion increase in annual GDP by 2050, “unlocking growth” in Northland and making the upper North Island more resilient to extreme weather events.

However, an independent analysis carried out for Parliament’s transport and infrastructure committee by Motu Research affiliate Dr Simon Chapple has questioned some of the conclusions regarding the expressway’s benefits.

“The NZIER report is advocacy research, paid for by people with monetary skin in the game to commercial providers of consultancy services, meaning its conclusions need to be regarded with caution by the public,” Chapple said, with its estimated benefits not readily verifiable.

…..

The estimated $1.2b increase in annual GDP appeared high, with the Waikato expressway (which connected much larger populations and economies) having estimated annual GDP benefits of $334 million – less than a third of the Northland figure.

NZIER had also failed to apply a time discount rate, used to reflect the value of receiving benefits from a project now rather than in the future. If the standard Treasury discount was applied to the Northland expressway, the annual GDP increase would shrink from $1.2b to $157m, while the cumulative benefits between 2040 and 2060 would reduce from $23.8b to $3.7b.


Rail network shutdowns

A quick reminder that with the Matariki long weekend next week, the rail network will be shut down again for works.

AT have put these calendars for the rest of the year on their website – but if someone from AT reads this, perhaps make it clickable so people can see larger versions more easily.


Perth’s rail network gets bigger again

Perth just opened its third major rail expansion project in less that a year. Last July they extended the Joondalup line by 14.5km to Yanchep, in December they opened a new 21 km line from Baswater to Ellennbrook and this week they opened a 17.5km extension of the Thornlie line to Cockburn.

They’ve got one big rail project to go, completing the upgrade of the Armadale line which sees the removal of 13 level crossings, including many by elevating significant sections of the line, and extending it a further 8km to Byford.


Colombia’s ‘city of eternal spring’ return to nature

Check out this series of photos in The Guardian about the city of Medellín’s efforts to bring back greenery in their environment.

Since 2016, the city has invested in greening the landscape as a way to reduce the urban heat island effect, improve air quality, prevent flooding and restore biodiversity

Area restored to nature in Parque Prado, Medellín, Columbia Photograph: Jaime Saldarriaga/Guardian

How the Anglosphere’s Planning Department is YIMBYism’s Main Obstacle

Interesting substack post by Sushil Tailor on the Anglospheres planning issue’s.

The answer was as obvious as it was revealing. Bonnie Crombie had just wanted to be mayor, but it was Mississauga’s planning department that taught her urban planning. The same pattern repeats across the country: politicians defer to the supposed expertise of their planning staff, absorbing what they believe to be institutional wisdom. In reality, they’re inheriting something far different—the crystallized trauma of decades spent trying to appease the unappeasable.

To understand how we arrived at this dysfunction, we need to recognize something unique about the Anglosphere’s approach to development. Unlike most of the world, where zoning rules determine what can be built, countries like Canada, the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom subject virtually every new development to public consultation. Community meetings become forums where the loudest voices—invariably those with the most time and the strongest opposition—shape policy.


Why bikes don’t need traffic lights!


Speed limit increases impact holiday routes

Central governments forced speed limit increases have annoyed holiday communities and beach communities.

Councils in Taupō and Thames-Coromandel were against a lot of changes there.

An overview report of the changes and impact of the reversals on road users in the Waikato region was presented to committee members at the meeting.

Mayor Len Salt said they had “heaps” of examples of the speed limits being reversed from 60kph to 100kph in the Hauraki-Thames district, and local holiday communities were “absolutely frustrated and livid”.

While in Hibiscus Coast in North Auckland with the speed limits finally going up, people are very very angry.

In an email to a concerned community member, Auckland Transport (AT) said several residents in Hatfields Beach had also raised concerns about the faster speed limit.

“To be clear, Auckland Transport does not believe the speed limit change to 70km to be either desirable or appropriate, however we were legally required to make this change.”

AT said in the email it might try to lower the speed limit again later this year subject to input from the local board.

Albany councillor John Watson said the speed limit increase was illogical. The change meant motorists were shifting from 70km through Hatfields Beach where there were beachgoers and pedestrians, down to 60km through open farmland and then up to 80km after that. Pūhoi resident Kate Shevland said logic was “all over the place” with the differing speed limits in Hatfields Beach and Waiwera. She has safety concerns about raising the speed limit at Hatfields Beach, which has become “very popular”.

“In the last few years, it has become a lot more pedestrianised, there are a lot more campervans, and there is always at least one food truck there in summer.

“I haven’t spoken to one person who thinks it [the increased speed limit] is a good idea. I just hope logic prevails.”

Given how complicated the government made reducing the reversals and returning to a safer speed, we can only open this happens before someone is added to the Road Toll. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for returning to the safe 30km/h limit around a lot of Auckland’s residential streets as that is not allowed by the new rule.


Finally, Smith & Caughey’s announced that their iconic Queen St store will close six weeks earlier than previously planned after the closing down sale had gone “exceptionally well” and “much better” than expected.

There had been reports of large crowds at the store. So carparking and access, like claimed by some, weren’t the real reason then.


That’s it from us for this week! Take care over the weekend.

Share this

36 comments

  1. I’m pro cycle infrastructure, but did the new Manawatu Gorge replacement really need a share path?

    Its fairly challenging terrain and while I am sure it will have its cyclists, not sure the numbers justify it. Surely they could just have kept left and then had some bays for them to pull into and continue, allowing traffic to overtake if held up.

    In saying that, along as it came out of the RoNS budget, its no skin off my nose.

    1. Terrible attitude. All state highways should have cycling infrastructure as well, cycling on the shoulder is suicide with shocking incompetence of kiwi drivers

      1. I agree with KLK to an extent. We live in a world where NZTA has plenty of money for things like this, but local councils have none. So we get gold plated cycling wherever there is an NZTA project, and nothing elsewhere. Wouldn’t it be better if the NZTA cycling budget was spent in the best places rather than only on state highways?

        1. Really it would be great if NZTA funds were used to reopen the Manawatū Gorge as a walking/cycling/riding trail. It is scenic, level and largely intact.

        2. We also don’t live in a perfect world. Even when councils do have the money they will come up against a lot of resistance.

          Adding a cycle path to any new state highway project makes sense to me.

          Regarding the Manawatu Gorge route, it would make a great cycle path until the next significant slip and that would likely be the end of it.

        3. The Gorge is done, I think. Too slip-prone and therefore, a hazard.

          I did the forest walk there and you get to access to about 100m of it before you head into the hill. Views are great.

      2. If this sets a precedent and all new highways will have cycling infrastructure, I’m all for it.

        If we have to pick and choose because of “funding”, I am not sure I would have picked this one.

  2. > Armadale line which sees the removal of 13 level crossings

    What’s the budget on that? If it’s anything like ours, i’m surprised they have $13billion to throw at the project

    1. That did take much digging.
      “The $701 million budget covers the overall cost of the Armadale Line upgrade, including the Victoria Park-Canning Level Crossing Removal Project. “

      1. Which gets them two rail viaducts of 1.8km and 1.4km and complete station rebuilds. How much are we spending on removing level crossings on the southern line again?

    1. New Zealanders would be able to look forward to the delivery of more infrastructure projects if we actually allowed people to monetise our natural resources.

      1. Perth might actually get another rail line if we sell off our resources to Australian companies making money.

      2. “New Zealanders would be able to look forward to the delivery of more infrastructure projects if we actually allowed people to monetise our natural resources”

        We could also just better allocate our current transport funding.

      3. Monetise or liquidate?

        Not against either, in principle, but would look to Norway rather than UK for a model on how to cash in on an oil field.

  3. The benefits don’t stack up you’re right… however the votes do and that’s why the GOVT is charging on with it Votes > Evidence.

    1. yayyyy! destroying the planet for the sake of a greedy and misled few!! agricultural collapse!! water wars!! 90% of the human population dead by the end of the century!!

      but i suppose you think if we ignore the facts and stick to the establishment right wing agenda, none of that will come to pass.

      go home to australia, troll, go play video games to sate your dumbass car addiction.

      1. The headline is speed limits are going back up. The reality is that one by one, high risk urban areas are going back to more responsible speeds. There is an article every other day reporting this and major pushback like you see above. There are at least 13 regional councils doing this.

        It reflects NZTA surveys on what people want and what National campaigned on – to listen to local communities.

        1. I agree with local communities deciding when the road doesn’t actually go anywhere for example No exit roads or culdesac. Any road that connects between anything let’s take Terry st near Blockhouse bay a critical rat run for thousands daily people have the right to butt in and override what people who live on the road want. Same for state highways it really doesn’t matter what the community want it’s what the majority of road users and community combined want as it’s main purpose is to traverse people around the country and the whole country is paying for that piece of road so the local community can suck it up maybe move away from the state highway. If we gave the community the decision with every piece of state highway it would be 50k everywhere and the economy would tank. Except for up north where the majority of the community also opposed the speed reductions in contrast to the BS NZTA (sorry Waka kotahi at the time) report. Sorry but we cannot let the local community decide every time otherwise we will need to have multi billion dollar motorways everywhere as that’s the only way you’ll be able to get anywhere in decent time. Sorry KLK would you like to provide 3 articles in the last week where speeds have gone back down or are you just making up a juicy soundbite that suits your narrative on the fly? a vocal minority campaigning does not count as speeds going back down. Also yep Burrower facts are inconvenient so we will dispose of them quietly, Momi ake. I understand it’s frustrating not getting your way but it’s the reality of democracy maybe do a better job at convincing people slower is safer instead of just ramming it through.

        2. @ Colah (yes we know it’s you, regurgitating the same cager BS while trying to fake your jeremy clarkson ass narrative) i hope when the climate collapse comes that you realise how foolish you are, and i’m sorry that suffering consequences is the only way to convince stupid people like yourself are wrong.

          or maybe getting into a car accident at your precious high speeds would change your mind? i’m afraid the survival odds for side-on collisions go down exponentially fast above 50km/h, and for head-on collisions above 70km/h.

        3. I’m aware of the possibility of the climate collapse you keep parroting but it’s a risk I’m willing to take to save a few minutes heck even seconds. Time is the most valuable we don’t need some blanket 30k everywhere it’s over the majority of the public decided to drop 30k as a speed limit for urban roads entirely. I won’t realise jack because I know if the climate does collapse it will have been because of greedy people torching the whole Amazon and India and China burning coal like there’s no tomorrow. I’ve acknowledged the evidence on speeds many times but like most voters I don’t give a damn about that, now get out of the way we’ve got 50k rat runs to use and 80k arterials to fly down we are not going to let a vocal minority stop that.

        4. “it’s a risk I’m willing to take to save a few minutes heck even seconds. Time is the most valuable”

          Yep, so you can come on here and spend those saved seconds to spout* your rubbish.

          But you know that as your only goal is to disrupt. In other words, trolling.

          *spout: express one’s views or ideas in a lengthy, declamatory, and unreflecting way

        5. I think what you meant to say Wilbert is do I can come on here and call out the lies that most people want slower speeds lies lies lies. 66% supported the reversal of speeds. 66%. KLK lies over and over hoping no one will call them out on it. I am open and transparent and admit the truth which is I don’t give a damn about the evidence. Anyway the good news is Stonefields and Remuera have been reversed back to 50kmh!!! Every speed reversed is a victory as it makes the wokies scream and that is funnier than anything else. TBH I actually supported 30k when it was proposed thru Glen Eden and a few others but honestly it’s just too funny seeing the reactions of the wokies when we increase the speeds heck I didn’t even think SH1 north of Auckland should be reversed but the reaction to it being done is so funny I now support it. Hahaha. It’s really hard to comprehend the reckless disregard for facts, evidence, and people’s lives. How can someone can be so consumed by ideology they can no longer see reality?

        6. It’s actually quite sad.

          You’ve repeatedly said that seconds matter to you. Fair enough.

          And then you go onto a website and spend those seconds that you gained by “calling people out” as you’ve phrased it. I hope you’re not spending too much time on other blogs – all those seconds saved will be gone in no time!

          Also, you seem to radicalise quite quickly by repeating words:

          “people want slower speeds lies lies lies”

          I would be careful if I were you; heart attacks are rising among younger adults. And no, that’s not because of the ‘vaccine’ (just pre-empting that for you).

          Maybe taking a break from all those liars on this and other blogs would do you good.

        7. it’s a very sad reality when someone saying “i will happily choose mass extinction and societal/planetary collapse so i can drive faster” isn’t a strawman opinion that no sane person would believe, but a genuine opinion held by utterly horrible wastes of sperm and egg who get joy out of spiting the victims they punch down on.

          i suppose this is what microplastics and pollutants in the body does. create gormless sadistic morons, who by all rights should’ve been separated from society to avoid dragging compassionate and educated people down with them.

        8. I wouldn’t worry about it too much Burrower.

          With their latest post, they’ve effectively admitted they’re trolling.

          “as it makes the wokies scream and that is funnier than anything else”

          “but honestly it’s just too funny seeing the reactions of the wokies when”

          “but the reaction to it being done is so funny I now support it. Hahaha.”

          Trolling, when done correctly, can be very subtle. The thing though is that, over time, trolls have to increase their level of trolling as it becomes ineffective. And that leaves them to start overdoing it.

          Again, I think it’s very sad that people actually spend time trolling but, hey, it’s their time, not mine.

          Anyway, admin will cancel or already have cancelled their account so we’ll just have to wait for a new name. I wonder what the next one will be. Or maybe they keep him on so we have our own blog-clown we can laugh about.

          I for one will no longer respond to any of his comments. Remember, they thrive on people getting upset; by not responding they won’t get their kick out of it.

  4. AT cycle budget – extra $10m from Council, who want to reduce the impact of govt. stinginess.

  5. “So carparking and access weren’t the real reason then” Might be true but then the sale did really well so there is demand for their products but no one wants to go into the city to get it. We didn’t survey everyone going to the store so we can’t arrogantly assume parking or access wasn’t the issue. I would suggest the most likely reason is our city centre is disgusting deros and rubbish everywhere. Unfortunately no decent public transport solves this issue people just prefer driving to their local mall in the weekend not going into the cold smelly dark wind tunnel that is Queen street. And then the parts of the city that are nice and benefit from good PT get screwed by AT taking 50 years to replace a drawbridge. Sigh.

    1. Auckland had great weather last summer. Heaps of people came into the CBD to go to events like Six the Musical. People clearly didn’t want to pay full price for what Smith & Caugheys were offering. Why would you when you can go to a name brand store and get individual service

      1. “centrists” will do anything to deny the flaws of death-spiral consumerist capitalism and how profiteering is and has always been the driving force behind the cost of living, or luxuries as it were, becoming unattainable. they’ll blame it on minorities, urbanists; anything that they don’t like that they feel threatens their privileges, which they want to pretend is Normal Baseline Living.

  6. Don’t think AT have anything to do with the drawbridge. And the main problem replacing the current temporary bridge is that no one is willing to pay for the replacement.

    1. I can’t believe it it’s like the one nice bit of the city apart from Britomart area. The whole bit near the civic is dead we need to stop worrying about that. Let’s divert funds towards making Wynyard more accessible.

      1. astounding illogic. i wonder how you think the waterfront became the nicest part of the CBD – fairies, magic and “private investment?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *