It’s one of the final Fridays of the year and we are getting into the last couple of weeks before the summer shutdown. We hope everyone’s excited to have a break! Here’s some of the stories that have caught our attention this week.

This post, like all our work, is made possible by generous donations from our readers and fans. If you’d like to support our work, you can join our circle of supporters here, or support us on Substack!


This week in Greater Auckland


Quick Survey for Consultation on Better cycling connections on Wellington St, Freemans Bay

Consultation closes today on a short stretch of potential cycleway on Wellington Street. Submit and show support for this and more!


Auckland Transport wins award for road safety work

Speaking of safety, while the Minister is busy trying to undo safety measures, AT is being recognised for the work it has done on speed limit changes. This from AT’s GM of Transport Safety, Teresa Burnett.

Woohoo! I’m so proud that Auckland Transport has been recognised at the Prince Michael International Road Safety award for our ‘outstanding achievement in road safety.’ This is for our Safe Speeds programme to quote: “Auckland’s programme serves as a model of innovation, evidence-based policy, and community engagement.”
So many people to thank here, AT staff both past and present, elected members, our partners and stakeholders. This award recognises the work of many people, not just AT staff. So thanks.

*We couldn’t be in London to pick up with award in person (obviously) so here’s our guy on the ground attending for us.

From LinkedIn, AT’s rep picking up the Prince Michael International Road Safety Award

Well done AT.


Highlighting the hassle of Hill St

Stuff have shown dashcam footage a driver nearly crashing with a police car, highlighting once again why the Hill St intersection needs to be upgraded.

As a reminder, this is what AT had planned for the intersection but funding for it has been pulled by the government unless they redesign it to make it less safe for people not in cars.


Not just Auckland

As we’ve been repeatedly seeing, it’s not just Auckland suffering from the government’s focus on speed and disregard for safety. Tasman District Council are getting pretty frustrated too.

Additional hurdles have appeared for Tasman District Council as it continues to try and lower speed limits after being forced to restart the process by the Government.

The unforeseen challenges have raised frustration among councillors, even leading the mayor to a swearing outburst during a Wednesday meeting.

The council is currently in the process of preparing to re-consult residents on lowering several speed limits across Tasman.

A suite of new speed limits for the district – which were widely supported by residents, approved by the council, and adopted by the New Zealand Transport Agency – were invalidated by the Government’s new rule for setting speed limits.

…..

Elected members’ patience was wearing thin with the uncontrollable and continued delays to the speed limit reductions that have been long-awaited by many communities around Tasman.

Mayor Tim King said the entire process seemed “entirely stupid” and was “such a load of shit”.


Urban form is important to climate change – sprawl is a big factor in emissions

Recent article by the World Economic Forum on how Urban Sprawl is contributing up to 30% of global greenhouse emissions. Car dependency, infrastructure, parking and more contribute to it.

This is not just an issue of planning – it’s a challenge of imagination. Many still believe growing urban populations require lots of car travel, segregated land uses and more built space per person.

The opposite is true: compact, walkable cities support well-being, opportunity, and far lower emissions. These cities aren’t places of scarcity; they’re places of abundance.

We can align population growth with climate targets by designing cities around people and planet. Per capita emissions in compact, mixed-use cities are typically two to three times lower than national averages.


How hot does Auckland get?

Auckland Council recently released a report highlighting the ‘urban heat island’ effect – the impact the urban environment has on temperature.

In a first for New Zealand, Auckland Council has released a report, Auckland Urban Heat Assessment, that highlights the impact of land cover on temperatures across the region, particularly within city areas where high-density buildings and infrastructure trap heat.

Chair of the Policy and Planning Committee Councillor Richard Hills says the report gives the council the data needed to understand the impacts of heat on Auckland’s vulnerable communities.

“While all of us feel the effects of summer heat, the research shows certain parts of the city have significantly hotter temperatures than others. Neighbourhoods with less tree cover, more concrete, and limited access to cooling infrastructure, experience even more intense temperatures.

Heat map of the Auckland region showing average air temperature.

New flash, too much driving makes our society worse

It turns out (who new) that too much driving is a bad thing. Other ways of travelling, like cycling, make us happier, and once you get past a certain threshold, car dependence decreases our life satisfaction.

Researchers from Arizona State surveyed more than 2,000 adults across the U.S. to understand how car dependence affects personal satisfaction in life. In moderation, they found, car use increases personal wellbeing by giving people better access and sense of freedom. “It’s not surprising that car use would increase life satisfaction,” they explain, “especially in the U.S. where the built environment and transportation infrastructure are developed around car usage.”  

However, the benefits are only good up to a certain point, then car use has the opposite effect: 

“In a typical week, relying on a car for more than 50% of the time for out-of-home activities is associated with a decrease in life satisfaction. This implies that at high levels of car dependence, there are negative implications that outweigh the benefits of car-based travel.” 


Bringing New Zealand’s Housing Upzone policies to America’s attention The Atlantic’s Good on Paper podcast

Eleanor West featured recently on The Atlantic’s Good on Paper podcast talking about the success of upzoning in New Zealand, and what else we have to do.

And so for a long time, we’ve had zoning regulations in New Zealand that kind of restrict the ability to build anything other than a standalone home, usually two stories. And so as the population has grown, there’s been a lot more demand for housing, but developers haven’t been able to build housing in the places where people want to live, like the inner city, because these zones restrict the ability to build up, and there’s kind of no more space to grow out in the inner city. And so there’s just a lot of competition for these houses in the highly desirable areas. Unless we address the supply constraint, that competition is just going to keep driving prices up.


Notre Dame reopened recently, check out what they planned few years ago outside

With the Notre Dame Cathedral needing repairs after a fire in 2019, a competition in 2022 occurred to transform the gardens outside. The winner was a Belgian architect – Bas Smets.

While the cathedral itself has been finished, outside work is ongoing to transform the surroundings, to be finished in 2027.

“The area around Notre Dame has changed so much throughout history,” says Bas Smets, the Belgian landscape architect who won an open competition to redesign the area around the cathedral in 2022. “It’s like a privileged witness of a city looking for its form. The question now is what kind of spaces we need for the city of tomorrow.”

On Friday 29 November, Smets was first in line to explain his vision to Macron, on the president’s first visit to inspect the reborn Notre Dame, before its official inauguration tomorrow. They stood on the first completed piece of the “petit parvis”, the forecourt in front of the cathedral, which Smets plans to expand to mirror the full length and width of the building, with grooved limestone flags reflecting the chequerboard marble floor inside.

His plan – to be completed by 2027 at a cost of €50m, funded by the city – will create a much more open setting for the cathedral, encouraging visitors to explore more of the Île de la Cité at a slower pace, beyond just queueing up for a peek inside Notre Dame before hot-footing it to the Eiffel Tower. The new spaces will prioritise people over vehicles, seeing roads closed and pedestrianised, and reconnect the cathedral to the Seine for the first time in generations, with a new 400 metre-long riverside promenade. Plenty of shade will be provided by 160 new drought-tolerant trees, which will also help to shield queueing visitors from winter winds, while the hottest days will be relieved by an ingenious air-cooling water feature – with a splash of fun.

Illustration from a few years ago showing changes to Notre Dame gardens: Studio Alma for Bureau Bas Smets

Navigating Auckland Traffic

The Spinoff answers a question on how to navigate Auckland traffic and in particular selfish drivers.

This is an interesting problem because you can’t really do anything about it. These people are strangers. You have no control over their behaviour. Getting mad about it only ruins your day. On the other hand, I think there’s a kind of freedom in futility. If the only thing you can control is your reaction, then maybe it’s time to get creative.

…..

My last suggestion is to practice the kindness you’d like to see on the road, with no expectation of reciprocity. Allow yourself to be overtaken. Let people in. Not because it’s the Right Thing To Do. But trying to make a habit of vehicular generosity will put you in a more relaxed and forgiving mindset. Even if nobody else appreciates your kindness, you’ll feel better, and that’s the main thing.

One of the great things about being on public transport is you have someone doing the driving for you meaning you don’t have to worry about it and can instead spend your time doing something else, like reading a book, watching a video or reading a blog like this one.

Bikes can also be a great way to avoid the stress of driving, especially when there’s safe infrastructure.


Study shows impact of physical activity on scooters

E-scooters have become a common site in our cities over the last few years and a study has looked at the impact they have on physical activity and muscle activity.

Introduction

Physical activity is an important consideration when it comes to evaluating the overall benefits of a particular mode of transportation. E-scooters are an increasingly popular form of micromobility but have generated concern over their impacts on active transportation modes. Although the transportation impacts of e-scooters have been widely studied, the physical activity impacts of these devices are uncertain. This study investigates physical activity and muscle activation from riding an e-scooter. We compare those outcomes to the two most common substituted modes, driving a car and walking.

…..

Results

The results reveal that riding an e-scooter provides light-intensity physical activity (energy expenditure = 2.14 METs). This is a significantly greater level of energy expenditure than that measured when driving (MET = 1.42), but less than that measured when walking (MET = 3.12). Compared to level walking, e-scooter riding had higher muscle activation in arms and trunk muscles. E-scooter muscle activation was higher in all muscle groups than driving. Driving a car is a sedentary mode, e-scooters provide light physical activity, and walking provides moderate physical activity.

Conclusions

The physical activity benefits of riding an e-scooter are maximized when people use them to replace sedentary travel such as driving. However, when e-scooters are used to replace moderate-intensity activities such as walking, net transportation-related physical activity could be reduced.


New future transit plans in Vancouver?


Interesting posts from the socials

Pt Chev is really starting to come together.

https://bsky.app/profile/alectang.bsky.social/post/3lcwtiwzmq22a

Here’s an interesting thread on what cities can do to improve their downtown environments.

Link here

During the pandemic, New York greatly expanded outdoor dining options with things like parklets and it was incredibly popular but the city has been removing them. So some shops are getting creative.

lmfao in case you needed proof of how stupid NYC’s new outdoor dining rules are, L’industrie (top slice shop in the city) just parked an old school bus outside and turned it into a dining area

Sam (@samd.bsky.social) 2024-12-10T23:30:34.823Z

Have a great weekend.

Share this

36 comments

    1. Yes, they need to get rid of the dedicated right turn lane/median (two lanes with straight/left, straight/right turns), phase the existing traffic light arrow so right turn and straight through are the same phase and extend the bike lane past the commercial carpark exits to the intersection.

    2. A bit of a misnomer there (unfortunately widely quoted): There was a study that looked into sharrow markings on some busy, fast arterial roads in the US – i.e. absolutely the worst place to put them (but some jurisdictions did this as a low-cost way to be seen to be doing “something” for biking). Not surprisingly, the cycle crash rates weren’t great.
      In NZ, sharrows are generally recommended on low-speed, low-volume routes like neighbourhood greenways, or other low-speed shared scenarios like roundabout approaches. Wellington has also been using them on downhill sections of its cycle routes where bike speeds are likely to better match the motor traffic – even then you would generally only mostly expect “enthused and confident” riders to make use of these.

    1. Be solved by not allowing yachts to go in there. Just have fixed lower level bridge suitable for light rail to cross in the future and just lower height boats to go under. Less maintenance and outages.
      All that pain and hardship for the public & those businesses due to allowing luxury craft in and out.

  1. If you share fear-mongering maps with lots of red to scare everyone living in those areas, at least add a legend so we know what red means: 0.1 degrees above average or 10 degrees above average? This should at least be part of a footnote, including the period for which the data show average temperatures. I thought they teach this basic stuff in high school these days.

  2. While the roundabout you share finally starts to look somewhat like a Dutch roundabout with the separate cycle lanes, I still don’t know why you make them so dangerously wide. Just make them fit a single car so cars actually slow down while driving over the roundabout. When you want to make it a double-lane roundabout, make sure you add a barrier between the lanes on the roundabout. Otherwise, it is more dangerous than a normal traffic light crossing.

    Keep up the good work and just take a look at satellite images of Dutch roundabouts or do a field trip.

  3. “Auckland Transport wins award for road safety work”

    Can that award be withdrawn if the speed changes are undone?

    Not trying to be mean to the AT folks who have done all this good mahi, but why would you award something that is currently being undone, leading to more deaths and injuries? *Sadface*

    1. Simeon calling Prince Michael of Kent and the international experts ‘woke’. What is the opposite of ‘woke’? ‘Comatose’, ‘Asleep at the wheel’? It just leaves Auckland’s ratepayers having to spend a heap of money to make roads deadly again, then spend even more money putting them back to safe speeds as soon as they can, knowing that (a) they wanted these safe speeds and (b) they have saved lives. But Simeon just pulls his blanket back over his head and chants “Not listening” over and again.

    2. They should have that award ripped away from them they failed. Not bringing the general public along for the ride by effectively explaining the benefits is a big fat F. All they did was use a BS report to explain what they did “worked” even though deaths actually went UP while that report was released and lied by saying most people liked the changes…. They didn’t hence the quick reversals next year.

      1. Exactly Burrower that report is about as useful in a fireplace as it is on the ministers desk. He knows the public does not care about evidence and is pushing ahead with the increases. Show him the report where it shows more votes being gained by making all urban roads 30K oh wait that report doesn’t exist because 90% of us don’t want to drive 30 everywhere. 8% increase is travel time is quite a lot and much more than the “few mins” AT promised at the start of the speed reductions. The report is not concrete evidence there is a lot of scaling trickery involved. The RAW data shows deaths went UP after speeds were reduced in 2020. This years decrease is simply to do with police increasing drink driving and excessive speeding enforcement and the economy being in the toilet. The new speeds have had a minimal effect on the speeds people are actually driving. (Just drove down Ti Rakau drive and 96% of vehicles do 60-70K).

  4. “has been pulled by the government unless they redesign it to make it less safe for people not in cars.”

    While that is indeed their thrust, the reality is that the changes as per the govt’s policy will also make it less safe for drivers too! But for them, the change is likely to be from panelbeater -> doctor’s visit.

    For active mode users, the risk is that it goes from doctor’s visit -> hospital or mortuary.

    1. The government’s decision to withhold funding for Warkworth’s Hill Street intersection upgrade reflects a strategic focus on essential infrastructure, aligning with the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024, which emphasizes economic growth and productivity. This approach contrasts with left-wing policies that often involve increased public spending, which can lead to higher inflation. In New Zealand, the annual inflation rate has eased to 2.2% as of September 2024, indicating that current fiscal policies are effectively managing inflationary pressures. ​​

      1. “reflects a strategic focus on essential infrastructure,”

        Such as motorways which return less money than they cost.

        And for your information, inflation is affected by a lot of things. For example the fact that a lot (more) people are now out of a job. Awesome work, govt, your policies are working (except more people aren’t, and those who can move overseas).

        If this govt was “cutting spending” I’d give them the benefit of good faith. But what they are doing is cutting spending on a very, very select list of things, while massively increasing spending on other things – including on tax cuts. So despite people like yourself not liking it, there is very much an argument to be made that their policies are not working except for the very narrow interests they sponsor.

        If you exclude the harm being done by policies, you can make any calculation look good.

      2. Weird how inflation is going down worldwide currently. Is that all the New Zealand’s government’s fault? Can we use that for climate targets?

        1. Inflation went crazy worldwide (due to Covid), but in NZ it was caused by Labour. Now inflation has gone down worldwide, but in NZ it was fixed by National.
          The economy has turned to crap this year, but that was caused by Labour.

    1. But he has done an about turn on 1 Road and on the News tonight he did not look very happy after finally read a report from NZTA saying not to put tolls on the new bridge in the Manawatu .

  5. On a completely different note, sometimes our Minister of Finance makes sense…

    This is from her announcement about ferries last week:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sFvX5Dw6s4 from 2:38:
    “It is important to note that the cost of the associated landside cannot be divorced from the cost of buying the ferries.

    There is no point in buying a new car if you’ve got nowhere to park it. And like it or not, paying for parking is part of the deal.

    In recent days, some have suggested that all that should be considered is the cost of the ships, with no attention paid to the cost of supporting infrastructure to berth them.

    So to that naïve suggestion I’d simply ask, how do people think passengers and freight were going to disembark the mega-ferries; rail enabled rafts perhaps?

    Project costs must be considered in their totality lest $4 billion mistakes are repeated.”
    3:38 ends.

    Love the emphasis on the fact that project costs have to be looked at in totality, and we should all be paying for parking. Now if only her colleagues would agree with that!

    And yes – my expectation is somewhat tongue in cheek.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *