This is a guest post from longtime supporter Mr Plod, whose previous contributions include a proposal that Hamilton become New Zealand’s capital city, an examination on cruise control and speed limits, and that we should switch which side of the road we drive on.

Greater Auckland is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers and fans. If you’d like to support our work, you can join our circle of supporters here, or support us on Substack!


Whenever we travel overseas we make a point of using Public Transport rather than hiring a car so on a recent business trip to Auckland I decided to do the same. So how did it work out? Quite well actually. I liked the generally clean trains and buses and the helpful bus drivers and the people I met on the transit lines were polite and courteous if a little bemused that a stranger would talk to them rather than silently doom scroll.

However, as my gig is process improvement, here are some process improvement suggestions for Auckland Transport and Waka Kotahi.


1. Route maps on the App.

The AT app is pretty good, however I’d love an interactive route map where I type in say “365” and see the full path that route takes. This would be useful where the Journey Planner suggests a number of different route combinations that I could review without having to first selecting one. Or, type in a stop number and see where all the routes that use that stop go to. Not a biggy if you have few options on your regular commute, aimed instead at the new or occasional user.

AT’s Current Journey Planner

2. More bus priority please.

I rode the 866 from Ponsonby Road to the Browns Bay shops. It was late afternoon, rush hour on a Friday. The first bus was crowded and only took on one passenger to replace the one that got off. The second bus took on all six waiting. I even got a seat. The first surprise is the bus had to join the general traffic to queue for the on-ramp lights on Curran St. Allocating the left hand lane as a bus priority lane up until say three car spaces from the lights would give the buses and everyone on board a clearer run and hardly impact the LOV*s at all. The second surprise was the cars parked kerbside along the bus route through the East Coast Bays. Before the Harbour Bridge, the East Coast Bays were one of Auckland’s holiday destinations with bachs in all the best spots.

Narrow roads wound their way down the ridge lines and across the swamps behind the beaches. After the bridge opened and during the North Shore subdivision boom of the ‘60s & ‘70s these narrow ridge line roads were curbed, channeled & sealed but seldom made any wider. Today’s vehicles are wider, there are more of them on the roads and many more parked curbside. The buses are bigger also. To their credit AT have painted yellow lines on the tighter and narrower corners to eliminate the overly dangerous parking but still the driver had to slow frequently where there were parked cars to allow the cars and buses using the road to pass each other with safe clearance. This parking needs to be better managed on this bus route.

These two issues are sort of similar to the dwell time issue on the trains. If we are to grow our economy by moving everything faster (cough, cough) the transport agencies must attend to every little delay to the vehicles carrying the most passengers as much as attending to the motorways that carry the fastest traffic.

Bus lane for the WX1 installed very quickly in August, more of these please? – Photo by Matt Lowrie

3. Better bus & train integration.

I travelled to South Auckland by bus and train on a wet Auckland day. I took the Inner Link from Ponsonby to Newmarket to catch the train south. I expected the bus to stop opposite Teed St so I could duck down the (grotty) lane into the station square and the station concourse. Oh no, the bus stopped 200m further down the road opposite the mall. Ok, a 200m walk is not hard even when it involves a road (plus slip road) crossing in heavy Auckland rain. Then neither is it hard to put the bus stop where it makes the most network sense, outside said grotty lane.

Be clear, I’m not advocating that the stop opposite the Westfield Mall be closed. Have both, one serves shoppers the other those going to or from the train. The bus & its stops should primarily serve the passengers’ journeys not the needs of someone wishing to park outside a shop. Once in south Auckland I used the buses and my legs to get around various appointments and spent too much time sheltering under a tree or just standing in the rain because of a lack of bus shelters. A simple corrugated iron structure on a concrete pad with a wooden bench seat would have sufficed. It needn’t be the fully glazed TV screened artistic wonder seen elsewhere in Auckland. Auckland is a wet place and gonna get wetter, bus passengers deserve better.

4. And again.

I started my journey home on the 11W to the City Centre to catch a train to Puhinui. Again I expected the bus to stop right at the bottom Queen St to enable a short road crossing and walk to Britomart station across Te Komititanga Square. Oh no, again we were unloaded 300m up the road opposite Vulcan Lane and the AT app suggested we wind our way through the back streets to enter the station back entrance. WTF? There is even a bus stop at the bottom of Queen St, #1325, which seems only to be used by the City Link buses. Again put the bus stop where it makes the most network sense. Three sets of passengers did the same trip as me, 11W into the city, Eastern line to Puhinui and then onto the Airporter bus. And we all did variations of that pointless walk from Vulcan Lane to Britomart. Again keep both stops; one for those headed to midtown, the other for those going to the train.

Bus Stop #1325 on Queen Street – Photo by Mr Plod

5. Street lights for walkers.

I travelled the buses at night and felt quite safe, maybe because I look and behave like a harmless old man. The buses were largely empty as were the city streets, due to the rain probably. However, the street lights blazed. Not that the light they produced was always much use to a walker. Take Halsey Street for example, between Fanshawe St and Victoria St West it has street lights. They must be six-seven meters in the air, directed towards the roadway and buried in the beautiful foliage of the Victoria Park trees. No damn use at all to anyone walking along there at night and no wonder people feel unsafe in the city at night.

Two problems here; the height of the lamp post and where the light is directed. Every time I get a warrant of fitness for my car they dutifully check that my headlights work and are aimed the right way. Although not required many city bikes are now sold with integrated lighting. So then why do we need to line our streets with even more lights to light the roadway for these things that come with lights. Street lights should be placed so that they light the way for the road users who do not come with legally mandated headlights; walkers!

The busway from the airport to Puhinui shows that it is perfectly practicable to put in lower light standards. I’m sure it would be perfectly practicable to build street lights 2.5m high designed to shine down on the footpath 25m in both directions. No where is this idiocy more apparent than on the Hopetown Bridge. There is a footpath but not a single light on that bridge designed to aid walkers at night, whereas nearby there are huge poles through spaghetti junction to light the way for the cars below. I’m sure there are some rules from way back that govern street lights, their placement and aiming. Probably written for Austin Sevens with 6V wiring. The world has moved on for motorcars, not so much for people, change the rules.

6. Statutory Neglect is alive and well.

When AT and the Police allow car transporters to blatantly ignore road rules is it a surprise that all over Auckland the footpath is treated as a parking lot. Either make the practice official by painting and signing the road appropriately or enforce your rules. Turning a blind eye makes you look ineffective.

Car transporters and questionable adherence to road rules – Photo by Mr Plod

The above are a few suggestions for AT & WK from a few days on the buses & trains in Auckland. Maybe I’ll try travel by bike next time.

Please use the comments section below to upvote or downvote or maybe add your ideas for opportunities for improvement. You never know who might be reading.

*LOV = low occupancy vehicle

Share this

44 comments

    1. I was going to push back a bit on #1, but now a bit puzzled about how the AT backend works.

      The screenshot in the article under the journey planner is showing the website. When you use the website, you can choose the timetable tab, enter a route like ‘365’ and it shows you all the stops. Clicking on a stop, and it shows a text list of times.

      The puzzle comes from doing the same thing on the app; this time you have no option to select timetable. But if you select a stop, then a route on the stop, it shows a map view of the route as Mr Plod wants.

      So clearly AT have a service backend able to dish up map views of routes; they just haven’t enabled it for the website front end, and also not given the option of the app to view (and download offline) time-tables.

      They have the option of requesting changes, and seems like a really minor enhancement; if viewing a route on https://at.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/#!/timetables, then have a hyperlink to also click on and show the map view

      1. Thanks for the tips. I got that to work and I can see the thinking behind it where the assumption is that you’re at a stop and can use the stop number to start your search. You’re also right that it shouldn’t be hard to get the same screen by entering the route number. Just another menu option.

      2. “So clearly AT have a service backend able to dish up map views of routes; they just haven’t enabled it for the website front end, and also not given the option of the app to view (and download offline) time-tables.’

        The AT web site and the AT mobile app are stand alone systems. They do not share a single back end. The AT mobile app was created by third party developers who did not engage with the in-house webbies. AT tried to apply “Agile ” methods to business and customer experience problems. Plus AT churned through several Digital Product Managers who were unable to achieve very much using that methodology. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSVBWvoNJ-s

        1. @Bus Driver our hairless leader would say that’s the most CEO way of working you just hate CEO’s

  1. Wow getting rid of parking to improve other modes! So simple and easy it would surely be unanimously supported by everyone.

    1. Yeahh! it’s an idea that is a bit out there, I know. Could be an idea that catches on, though. Talk to your friends about it.

  2. Street lighting for walkers: For many urban streets, the Standard for lighting design requires footpath illumination. However, for arterial streets, lighting is designed for the roadway with footpaths assumed to receive enough illumination from that. Rather obviously, that doesn’t always work. It has also been an effort to get developers to understand that street lighting engineers and landscape architects need to work together on their designs so that the result is not only brightly-lit leaves. And bridges over motorways need to avoid light spill glare to the motorway at the same time as lighting the road and footpaths over the motorway. It may be necessary to have roadway lighting supplemented by additional path lighting. It’s difficult sometimes, but not an excuse for not working to solve the problem.

    1. How about LED strip lights under the hand rail? Lighting has moved on from High Voltage gas vapour lights atop high poles.

      1. True and not true.

        You would still need to distribute power at line voltage, even though the LEDs only need a relatively low DC voltage (due to line losses and heavier cables needed if using a lower voltage distribution system for the same power).

        Also LED drivers are notoriously unreliable, so making these as “edge” as possible whilst more expensive in terms of capex is probably a better user experience. Perhaps even cheaper in terms of opex when it comes to replacement time.

        A bit pedantic I guess. It’s the engineer in me.

  3. Buses per hour divided by dwell time gives the number of stops required. Especially difficult for the city centre. Each stop requires 15 m platform and at least 9 m gap, if buses are to arrive and depart independently. Even with through-routing so that services don’t terminate at the busy interchange stops, that still requires a huge length of kerbside platform in the city centre to meet timetable. Add in clear space at intersections for turning and at least some Loading Zones and stop locations become limited. So interchange walking distances are difficult to resolve.
    The city centre problem is not a ‘bus sausage’ it’s a ‘bus caterpillar’, with some parts stopped while others in between are moving.

    1. You obviously know something about this stuff. How about writing a blog post that puts it into pictures or a simple interactive design model where we can fiddle with the input variables to aid our understanding of the tipping & collapse points.

    2. A short note, it’s actually headway divided by dwell time, plus getting in and out of the stop.
      In the city centre that amounts to “how many buses might turn up at the same time in each phase of the lights”. With bunching that’s more stops that just headway/dwell.

  4. On dwell times, I was recently in Shanghai which, to my surprise, has dwell times on its metro that rival Auckland’s. Even after the train had loaded, there always seemed to be a long pause before the doors shut and the train moved off. I timed the “dwell” there at between 30 and 50 seconds, averaging probably 40-45. Just as frustrating there as it is here in Auckland.

    1. That’s right. I lived in Shanghai for seven years until 2020 and noticed the surprisingly long dwell times too. However the trains are frequent and inexpensive (fares are the equivalent of about $1 to $2) and the metro network has grown from 0 kilometres in 1992 to more than 800 kilometres today so it’s not all bad!

  5. The dwell times on trains is frustrating especially when there are no movements on or off the train. With the proposed City link timetable this will have to improve even the old DMU trains had less dwell time.

  6. One of the delays that may not be so apparent is the gentle deceleration of the trains into the open platform stations. The trains. travel past the stations at about 20 km/hr before stopping presumably to allow the driver the opportunity for an emergency stop if a person falls off the platform.
    The epitome of urban mass transport, the Yamanote Line, has platform barriers and doors at every station. Yamanote Line trains enter every station at at 60 km/hr and brakek tosteadily down the platform length. Since every Yamanote Line train is 14 carriages long this is about 200m. The driver doesn’t have to expect a passenger walking or being pushed off the platform. If every AT rail platform had a barrier with gates the trains would all be able to approach the stations at full speed and then brake 200 m before the end of the platform. You work out the difference in the dwell times.

    1. The couldn’t even get platform screen doors on the CRL (only “future proofing”) so the chance on the whole network is….. unlikely….

    2. I believe there are overseas metro and commuter rail networks that do have fast runs and deceleration into stations without platform screen doors? e.g. the London Victoria line?

      even if we’re not getting Yamanote Line levels of performance surely there’s some level of speed improvements we can get on the present network without major infrastructure?

    3. Just a small point but trains on the Yamanote Line have 11 cars.

      Platform screen doors were only installed at stations on the Yamanote Line in the 2010s.

  7. A good deal of common sense and observation here. A lot can and should be done to at least give the suggesions critical and hopefully positive examination.

  8. So long as resistant to vandalism. Lighting is traditionally put ‘out of reach’ for safety, although low voltage LED can be part of the answer. Low level lighting can be a glare hazard for drivers, and although it illuminates the footpath surface, it does not provide vertical illumination of pedestrians, so not so good for CPTED.

      1. LEDs under the handrail seems to provided pleasant and perfectly adequate lighting on the GI2TD cycleway – though the sections through the Porewa Valley have spent most of the last two winters of of action, apparently due to parts failure when exposed to weather, so perhaps some learning still to do on execution there?!

  9. The downtown/midtown bus situation would definitely be helped when the CRL works are finished and the central city bus plan can be implemented. Seems the plan is to run NW buses into Lower Albert?

    the queen st bus stops closest to Waitemata/Britomart seem rather short and narrow given the pedestrianisation works that have happened down there…

  10. When I was regularly walking very late at night/early in the morning, I would make sure to carry a torch. This was not because the street lights were insufficiently illuminating, it was because they were fine when functioning unless there were trees.

    This was a much more suburban area notorious for its relative lack of street trees mind.

    As to the Inner Link bus stop. I’ve hurt my knee and I’m hobbling around on a crutch at the moment. I was jumping around various medical appointments last week and decided to catch the bus home. Obviously I had to do a little bit of walking — to the bus stop and then up & down on to the platform (Penrose). I don’t know if it was a coincidence but the next morning was the first time I’ve woken up with more pain than less.

    It’s hardly an original observation but I feel from a mobility point of view, 200m is quite far.

    Also, I feel like bus stops should indicate which way their partner is. I could see the one going the wrong way from where I left my last appointment but I couldn’t see the one I needed. I don’t know if that was a case or insufficiently bright colouring — the stop was surrounded by trees and maybe blended in — or just my bad eyesight, but it did add some extra walking trying to find the stop. Luckily I didn’t walk the wrong way — the bus turned up and I could infer the location of the stop from where it stopped — but if there was an arrow painted on the shelters indicating the direction of the pair, that’d be useful (when they’re not opposite each other).

    As to shelters, I haven’t been through for a while but I noticed my old bus stop in Drury was deconstructed and relocated — without the shelter — some months ago. There was a sign saying they’re going to build a new shelter but if it’s there now (I don’t know) then there was a considerable lag between new stop and new shelter. How hard is it to build the shelter and then relocate the stop?

    1. ” How hard is it to build the shelter and then relocate the stop’

      There used to be a person with AT who planned bus stops and shelters. Perhaps he has been made redundant in one of the frequent restructures, designed to save costs within AT?

  11. Good news is that the Great North Road road improvements project, which will help with the car transporters, has survived various attempts to kill it off and is funded in the signed off council transport plan, with works likely to start in January (was delayed a little from late Oct start, and this time of year you always have to wait until after Xmas apparently, hence January). https://at.govt.nz/projects-initiatives/city-centre-projects-and-initiatives/great-north-road-improvements

    PS On the app not showing the full route easily, I often go through to the map to see the rest of the route, hadn’t realised it was such a popular idea, thought I was just being extra geeky.

    1. “A good app to get is the move it app type in the route number and it tracks your journey plus it shows bus stops’

      The AT Mobile app tracks your journey, tracks the bus in real time, shows the occupancy of the bus and it shows all of the bus stops on your route. You can also save your favourite journeys. ie “home to work via Ponsonby”

  12. As a daily traveller all over central Ak. and, out as far as Beachlands to the east and, Otahuhu to the south, no complaints whatsoever about the buses or the AT app. The journey map is also easy as and I use it regularly once on the bus, so that I don’t miss the stop that I want to get off at if I don’t already know it. . If I am unfamiliar with where the return bus stop might be, I always ask the driver before I get off the bus. I find the whole AT app. service great.

    Ferry service great again.

    The lack of reliability of the trains is a whole other matter and due to this, I have largely given up on using the train

  13. “Once in south Auckland I used the buses and my legs to get around various appointments and spent too much time sheltering under a tree or just standing in the rain because of a lack of bus shelters. A simple corrugated iron structure on a concrete pad with a wooden bench seat would have sufficed.”

    Budget. AT and passengers prefer gold plated “attractive” and “safe” bus shelters that conform to their design document. This is a result of research study that was conducted comparing several styles of shelter. A tin shed does not meet these expectations from customers, especially disabled passengers. Bus shelters that are constantly vandalized drains the bus shelter budget. Last time I checked it takes months to get a permit to install a new shelter, and there are hundreds of new shelters on the waiting list. There are more than 5000 bus stops across Auckland.

  14. Point 5 definitely hits home. One of my first observations when I moved here was how dark of a city Auckland seems to be for pedestrians. If I weren’t a 6ft tall guy with a beard I’d definitely be uncomfortable to walk around after dusk.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *