Welcome to the end of the week and the end of the month. Ready to “spring forward” to Daylight Saving Time this weekend?
As always, this post is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew. If you’d like to support our work and keep the posts coming, we welcome donations and rolling subscriptions – we appreciate our community of support! Also, if you’d like to write for us or have an idea for a story, please get in touch.
Our header image this week is the old Grafton Gully pedestrian bridge (Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 5-0835).
The week on Greater Auckland
- On Monday, a lovely guest post by Nikki Goodson asked: could Auckland join the ranks of Swimmable Cities?
- Tuesday’s post by Matt looked at the Mayor’s musings about a Meola Reef bridge, and the questions this raises about what’s actually needed.
- Wednesday’s guest post by our fave Darren Davis outlined nine lessons from Perth – for Auckland or anywhere – on public transport.
- And yesterday’s deep dive editorial looked at recently released documents that show Simeon Brown ignored widespread concern about the impact of his Government Policy Statement on Land Transport, particularly the impacts on housing, urban development, climate, equity and ministerial overreach.
Events
The Great Debate: Queen St Must Evolve! at Q Theatre this evening, Friday 27 September, as part of the Aotearoa Festival of Architecture. (Alas, sold out already!). Doors open at 6pm, debate from 6.30-7.30pm, tickets $9.99.
The Auckland Heritage Festival gets underway this weekend, and runs from Saturday 28 September to Sunday13 October. This year’s theme is “Moana Oceania – the great connector”, and links the Pacific nations to Tāmaki Makaurau, with over 130 events to enjoy.

Who keeps cities running?
This week saw a vigorous conversation about requiring workers to return to the office, in part to reinvigorate city businesses – kicked off by the government decreeing that flexible working conditions are not an “entitlement”. Tell that to the thousands of civil servants who’ve recently been disentitled/ flexed right out of their jobs. Several social media wits also noted this was a bit rich coming from a Prime Minister who once led people to believe he was working from Te Puke when he was in fact holidaying in Hawai’i.
News outlet Stuff asked the reasonable question: how much civil servants could be expected to spend if they returned to the office five days a week?
It was not straightforward to answer because it was likely workers may not be able to put their money towards a coffee and a scone, or a takeaway lunch, thanks to the rising costs of commuting into the CBD.
…
First Retail Group managing director Chris Wilkinson said the cost of commuting was definitely recognised as one of the key factors that influence people’s choices.“What could be the game changer here is the proposal for capped fares which could encourage more use of public transport and most importantly a shift by those not yet using public transport.
“The big issue is the reduction in discretionary spend due to inflationary pressures, but concerns about job security which is keeping money in people’s wallets.”
A follow-up article featured Wellingtonians who work from home saying “they would suffer additional financial burdens in having to return to the office, with many citing parking, petrol and public transport costs.” Yet another piece explored the lemons-to-lemonade phenomenon of cafes and specialty shops migrating to the ‘burbs and finding a whole new customer base, with one wine-bar owner saying:
“When we told people we were going to open in the evenings, people in Ngaio were so thrilled some hugged us.”

Meanwhile in Auckland, Heart of the City’s Viv Beck urged Auckalnd Council to lead the way on making its staff return to the central city offices.
Auckland Council says it has no plans to do that, with CEO Phil Wilson pointing out the obvious:
[Wilson] said the general rule was to be in the office for a minimum of three days a week – but a council was not a typical office. “We’re a pretty big regional entity, and we’ve got a lot of jobs that are not office-based, and a lot of jobs that are only requiring to be based in the office for some of the time. Lots of people out in the field, building inspectors, lots of people who don’t have the luxury of working outside the office, in our libraries, our pools and our parks.”
Despite that, office occupancy rates across council’s four buildings – only one of which is in the CBD – are more than 80 percent. The council has also saved $34 million by reducing “unnecessary office space” and applying “smarter working principles”.
In baffling news, busy new shopping centre near airport jams airport access roads
Lots of reporting this week about the opening of the new outlet mall near the airport, Mānawa Bay.
Travellers warned to expect delays around Auckland Airport as new outlet centre opens, presaged RNZ on Saturday, followed by Thousands flock to Auckland’s newest mall on Monday, followed by Traffic jams cause delays at Auckland Airport on Wednesday. As the latter story notes, a key problem was airport staff getting stuck in traffic:
Auckland Council said the mall had to meet several conditions relating to access, parking and traffic circulation and there was a detailed transport assessment as part of the consent process.
However, the board of Airline Representatives said baggage handlers and crew had already been caught in the traffic bottleneck. Executive director Cath O’Brien told Checkpoint the outlet mall’s busiest times would be the same time as the airport’s peak times. “It will be busy around Christmas and Easter and school holidays, which is unfortunately exactly the same time for Aviation and travel. It’s busy around the airport.”.
There was only two ways into the airport precinct, from the north and the south, and these roads were becoming blocked and congested, she said. “Staff are getting caught up in those traffic jams as they try to get to work.”
The NZ Herald on Sunday ran the poignant headline Motorists baffled after new Mānawa Bay mall next to Auckland Airport causes traffic chaos. Truly, nothing more baffling than trying to drive somewhere at the same time as everyone else and finding yourself stuck in traffic. Most mysterious!
The Mānawa Bay website notes that you can also catch the bus, although it drops you off a ten-minute walk from the mall itself, and unfortunately the bus stop locations aren’t shown on the mall’s maps. Could you bike there? Great question! Luckily the Herald story included this tweet:

Nelson businesses leading a low-carbon commute initiative
As Stuff reports, any town can tackle climate-changing transport emissions to make a difference, and the town of Nelson is doing just that:
They make up 93% of Nelson household greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and about 60% of the city’s GHG emissions overall. Now an initiative is underway to help reduce Nelson’s transport emissions, with some of the city’s biggest employers on board.
The scheme aims to help commuters switch to low emissions modes of transport to and from work. Surveys are set to go to nearly 3,500 employees under the “low-carbon commute” project, led by Mission Zero – an initiative from Nelson-based charitable trust, Businesses for Climate Action.
…
While paddle boarding was the project’s “mascot”, the Nelson City Council-funded initiative was “obviously not serious about people paddle boarding to work”, [project manager Marta ]Karlik-Neale said.“The message we’re trying to portray through that is that the commute to work doesn’t have to be a drag, it can be fun. It can be active, it can be your exercise for the day … rather than sitting in traffic in a car.”

What old tram lines can teach us about successful bus routes
A great read from two great ambassadors for public transport: New Plymouth-based Suraya Sidhu-Singh, and Whanganui-based Anthonie Tonnon. With New Plymouth set to roll out a three-year trial of high-frequency bus services, the two write about what Whanganui has learned:
To understand what a high-frequency bus route should be like, we can look back to frequent routes we once had: Trams. They kept to high-density areas, avoided loops and went out-and-back along the same roads. Their routes were straight, simple and easily described.
Whanganui is a third smaller than New Plymouth. Last year it introduced a bus that runs every 20 minutes, Te Ngaru The Tide. Bus use in Whanganui doubled in The Tide’s first year. Crucially, The Tide’s route is out-and-back along the same roads, sticking to main roads and higher density. It largely follows former tram routes, where density remains from the days businesses and residents flocked to be near them.
The other thing that’s key to rapid public uptake of public transport – and we heartily agree: “best-in-class promotion and marketing”.
Buses should be easily identified with eye-catching livery. Bus stops and shelters will need upgrading, with vibrant, route-specific information.
A strong, visual campaign must ensure everyone knows about the new bus, including letterbox drops to those near each stop. Bus cards (Bee Cards) must be made easier to get hold of.
In the run-up to its launch, you couldn’t turn around in Whanganui without seeing a poster, flyer, billboard or clearly flagged bus stop advertising the new bus

Pothole fast-track endangering workers and potholes?
Also from Whanganui, a story about potential pitfalls of the Minister’s desired fast-track 24-hour approach to fixing potholes – with potholes quickly filling with water in persistent rain, and safety for workers potentially compromised to keep traffic flowing. (Emphasis added).
On September 18, about 10 potholes on State Highway 3 Carlton Ave were repaired by NZTA to meet the Government Policy Statement on land transport, with an expectation a greater number of potholes on state highways would be identified and fixed within 24 hours.
Two days after the repair job, the Chronicle photographed the repaired potholes, which had visible gaps and were filled with water.
In response to questions about whether the repairs had failed, NZTA regional manager of maintenance and operations Rua Pani said the volume of traffic on Carlton Ave increased the risk of the road failing during extended periods of wet weather, such as had been experienced lately.
“Crews were on-site on Saturday making temporary fixes; however, with further heavy and persistent rain [on Sunday], it’s anticipated further temporary fixes will be likely,” Pani said.
[…]
The road remained open while the potholes were being repaired, with the Chronicle observing contractors dodging traffic to fill the holes.Pani said a risk assessment was carried out first and the safety of roading crews and road users was the main priority when determining what traffic management was needed. In this case, other crew members were monitoring for oncoming traffic.
“The contractor has completed an ‘on-foot risk assessment’ and based on the input of the risk assessment, it was deemed suitable not to have temporary traffic management set up at this site. “The need for safety as the main priority is also balanced with the desire to minimise disruption to road users, ensuring efficiency for travel.”
Work to ensure potholes are no longer dominating New Zealand’s roads is an ongoing project promoted by Transport Minister Simeon Brown.
Good points about safe speeds
While we await the release of the finalised Setting of Speeds Rule (and whether it will include the key safety caveat “where safe to do so”), a media release from Lucinda Rees of Safer School Speeds brings a fresh angle. It calls on the Minister to “get tough on road safety”, because “vulnerable road users have a right to live without fear and intimidation”:
“Children should have a right to make their way to school independently without fear or intimidation on the roads. There has been a lot of talk about gangs and the damage they do, however arguably more Kiwis face regular threats on our roads. The Minister of Transport is clearly ignoring this, by proposing to raise speed limits. Children will be most at risk from this.”
And a good point made by Jonathan Milne in this tweet (the linked article is here)

Bikes just keep rolling
Active Travel England – the UK government agency whose mission is to lift the number of journeys made by walking, wheeling and cycling by 2030 – has a new website, featuring design guidance, case studies, and other resources for councils looking to improve their street networks. We like their motto “happier, healther, greener“. They may want to add “more efficient and highly cost-effective“, as future-proofing against a change of political weather…
Related: an interesting read from Auckland Transport’s head of cycling, Adrian Lord, about the UK’s All-Party Parliamentary Cycling Group (APPCG), which has been instrumental in establishing a bipartisan long-term approach to planning for active transport.
One of the great achievements of the APPCG, particularly Lord Berkley, was to embed cycling into the 2015 Infrastructure Act that set out some long-term investment priorities for the nation. This was an attempt to overcome the ‘stop-start’ funding cycle that occurs with changes in government. […]
New Zealand is plagued by the three-year political cycle, and in Auckland we also have local body elections a year before the general election, so really only two years with any semblance of stability. It is not an environment for successful long-term planning and delivery, as noted by the former head of the City Rail Link.
Unfortunately for cycling in the city, the tide is sweeping in, with the double whammy of local and national political opposition and sweeping funding cuts for all things except new roads. Hopefully we got the timing right, and that enough things are ‘committed’ or in construction to keep momentum, but as I’ve been brutally reminded this week, even things we’re in the middle of building can be stopped when a few rogue individuals and sympathetic staff are willing to over-ride our systems.
It’s funny how when money is tight, the cheapest and most universally accessible modes of transport are regarded as ‘nice to have’ and the most expensive, most damaging, most hazardous and least efficient mode is ‘essential’.
Another week, another e-bike subsidy scheme – this time, in Queensland. As Bicycle Network reports:
The $1 million E-Mobility Rebate Scheme provides e-bike buyers with a $500 rebate towards the purchase price, provided their new ride meets the criteria.
Rebates are on offer for electrically power-assisted cycles (EPAC) with a maximum continuous rated power of 250 watts that cuts out when the rider reaches 25/km/h, or stops pedalling. Power-assisted e-bikes are also eligible, but power output is limited to 200 watts and they must not be capable of travelling faster than 6km/h when the user isn’t pedalling, and 25km/h when they are.
Also on offer are $200 rebates for eligible e-scooters.
The scheme is a part of the Queensland’s Zero Emission Vehicle Strategy 2022-2032, and is another sign of growing recognition that e-bikes have a key role to play in the transition to net zero.
Speaking of e-scooters: Auckland Council has re-upped its agreements with Lime and Flamingo to run fleets of rental scooters on city streets. Although we are wondering: whatever happened to Lime e-bikes? Those were super handy.
An allocation of 3000 scooters across the city will be split between the two operators from November 4 — with 1800 in and near the city centre, and 1200 in suburban areas.
Busy enough for four-lanes but not for tolls?
Waka Kotahi are currently consulting on tolls for two roads currently under construction, the Tauranga Northern Link and Te Ahu a Turanga, the replacement to the Manawatu Gorge that was closed in 2017 following major slips.
In both cases local residents are opposed to this and saying it’s unfair. In the case of Te Ahu a Turanga, they’re questioning the numbers used to justify it.
The plan to charge motorists $4.30 and trucks $8.60 a trip has come under heavy criticism from people in surrounding areas, who have waited years for the new highway to open.
The NZ Transport Agency has released its tolling assessment for the new road under the Official Information Act. It includes a section on compliance under “legislative requirements and practicality test”.
One of these requires that, for a road under consideration for tolling, “not less than 10,000 vehicles are likely to travel the road per day”.
Transport agency modelling forecasts 10,902 vehicles a day using the road in 2025, rising to 14,250 a day in in 2048.
But the figure of 10,902 requires a huge increase from the traffic counts available and Tararua District mayor Tracey Collis says the transport agency’s number don’t add up.
When the old State Highway 3 through the Manawatū Gorge closed in 2017 due to rockfall, it carried 7600 vehicles, including 1100 trucks a day.
A traffic count provided to RNZ from 2019 showed 5565 vehicles used the alternative Saddle Road on a particular day, and 1944 used fellow alternative the Pahīatua Track. Of those 7509 vehicles, about 11 to 12 percent were trucks.
We recall reading about locals pushing for the road to be four-laned, claiming it was about future-proofing for growth. The work done as part of the decision to four-lane the entire project is probably what Waka Kotahi are using to justify the tolling, which is somewhat ironic.
We’ve also seen locals opposing tolls on Penlink, despite this having been planned and discussed as a toll road for decades. This raises the question of whether tolls should really be included into the business cases process, rather than discussed when the road is nearly finished. Tolling would change how viable some of these big road projects really are, and confirming it at the start of the project sets expectations with locals. This could be a kind of “no tolling, no road” deal.

Embracing te reo Māori across the transport network in Tāmaki Makaurau
A nice piece by Te Ao Māori news about Auckland Transport’s efforts to embed te reo alongside English and NZSL in its announcements and signage. The video accompanying the story includes the “soothing whaea voice” of Josy Peita, whose dulcet tones you’ll be familiar with if you regularly catch the bus or train. Also some nice vox pops from members of the public.
AT head of Māori outcomes Lillian Tahuri says the company’s reo journey started in 2016, with Auckland Council’s Māori language policy. “It’s been a journey from zero to where we are now – we’ve got 100 per cent of our reo dual signage in all [of] our train stations, bus stations, on all of our platforms and ferry terminals.”
Tahuri explains that 97.8 per cent of AT’s audio is bilingual, as some of the stops are too short to have audio in both languages.
The team says it is grateful for mātanga reo such as Pania Papa, Leon Blake and Sir Tīmoti Karetu for their hand in bringing this vision to life.
Te reo Māori is also being implemented in cycleways, footpaths and infrastructure buildings.
Of the city’s 1.7 million population, Tahuri says an estimated 300,000 people use AT’s networks each day, and the public response has been overwhelmingly positive.“We even [have] our own staff excited to be sitting on a bus hearing Josy – [her] soothing whaea voice.”
Bridge to the future
With all the talk of massive bridge projects lately, it’s easy to forget we just used to “chuck ’em up, bro”. This is the second Grafton Bridge, in a colourised image (original held by Te Papa) by Tales of NZ on Facebook. It came to us via the excellent City Centre Residents Group newsletter. Where would you put one of these?
Looking west from Grafton across Grafton Gully towards Symonds Street, showing the footbridge leading to St Martins Lane and the Symonds Street Cemetery (centre). The bridge was removed in September 1904.


For those wondering what that £5 penalty in 1900 (date of photo) for running, jumping or damaging the bridge would be today…
$1,189.53
Makes even the new parking fees seem tiny.
Excellent bit of historical maths there, thank you!
The problem with tolls is that they are easy to remove by a politician wanting to curry favour and not caring about the long term impacts on budgets. The costs for a mega motorway, once built? Can’t remove those again.
Cry me a river, locals, about “unfair” tolls. If we actually charged the damage that car (and truck) transport would do, both in maintenance terms and in other societal effects, it would be much, much more expensive (including for me, as I drive several hundred kilometers per week).
Instead we all subsidise it. And you cry foul when getting new roads, you have to pay for more choice and driving convenience?
Part of the issue is NZTA only decides to announce tolling once the project is nearly done. The residents are thinking they will have a safer more efficient route and then wham a big toll whacked on last minute. Is there a benefit to not tolling it meaning more cars and trucks use the new much safer route as opposed to having a head on crash on the old route. Also spoiler the speeds are being reversed whether they are safe or not the minister stated 65% support for this. The reason they will do it regardless is AT will try and claim it’s unsafe blah blah blah completely ignoring what most people want which is to go back to the old speeds.
Auckland Trains (and whatever you called yourself the last few weeks) – could you provide a link to that 65% claim?
EVeryone needs to stop replying to Simeon.
“Part of the issue is NZTA only decides to announce tolling once the project is nearly done. ”
So a few decades in advance (like on Penlink) is not enough warning? I call bullshit.
“Also spoiler the speeds are being reversed whether they are safe or not the minister stated 65% support for this. ”
So what? Human rights don’t get voted away with a fake poll. “Sorry you died, people wanted it.”
“The reason they will do it regardless is AT will try and claim it’s unsafe blah blah blah completely ignoring what most people want which is to go back to the old speeds.”
More lies. AT didn’t claim this, they can prove it. With studies elsewhere before, and results since. That’s called evidence, which some people in this era have real problems with, it seems.
As for “most people wanted it” is also bullshit, because AT’s changes were *extensively* consulted on and the public SUPPORTED THEM.
I know this isn’t going to change your dial, but I’m not simply going to let this broom broom broom propaganda stand.
Damian you know full well we are all talking about Manawatu where in my statement did I mention penlink? Obviously penlink has been a toll road from the start but Manawatu quite literally is replacing the old road it shouldn’t be tolled. It’s not a fake poll for goodness sake it’s the actual concrete consultation document stop being so dishonest. They can’t prove it they can only speculate on the data some roads never had any deaths on them lowering the speed limit only slowed people down. If you’re referring to the Abley report that’s not concrete enough and it can be proven. Sorry where did the public support them apart from a poll based with leading questions. Ask AT what the support level was for the arterial roads reducing in Phase 3 of their plan I think you’d find it was actually majority against. Maybe just calm down a bit and stop lying, you can’t seriously argue in good faith when you’re not wiling to even accept the most basic of facts like the majority supported this when it’s literally the actual consultation document on the 2024 setting of speeds. KLK? I’ll just answer the second bit of that statement as I think you’ve confused me. My evidence was watching the 1 news in depth analysis on speed limits where the minister stated 65% support “I think 65% of people who submitted supported the reversals” he also said “well ulitimately nzers voted to reverse labours blanket speed limit reductions, that’s what we are committed to doing”
“well ulitimately nzers voted to reverse labours blanket speed limit reductions, that’s what we are committed to doing”
Indeed. But they did not vote for a blanket ban on any speed reduction measures or for central government to legislate over the communities wishes. They did not vote against speed restrictions per se.
And thats what the WK survey tells us; 70% are in favour of speed reductions in their community.
Its for the communities to decide and as the Minister got voted in on “localism”, maybe he should walk the walk.
They tried exactly the same trick in Greenhithe. Transit NZ sent Clive Fuhr out to tell us the motorway was going to be tolled so we could pay cash to travel to the doctor, pharmacy and shops. The local MP told a public meeting he was opposed and then became prime minister.
“65% support” – I’m waiting to see a meaningful analysis of the submissions on that Rule change. Considering that Simeon hyped a social media campaign to support his proposal, a real analysis of the knowledge and understanding of submitters and the range of views expressed is needed before we can say what that 65% means.
It can’t be called informed choice, because NZTA were not allowed to put together the Impact Statement that proposed Rule changes are required to provide. So no-one, especially the Minister, was informed about the consequences of the Rule change.
The proposal was good in parts – like the curate’s egg. Support for the few good bits doesn’t mean support for the whole.
Plenty of professional bodies and individuals who know what the change means have submitted against it – a listing and release of those submissions should tell the nation what was really said.
Most of those 65% probably sound like the media Comments sections, form people with the same limited understanding as the Minister.
True democracy would be the government producing a real impact statement and holding a forum of deliberative democracy, ranged around the country and with representative membership to canvass informed choice. But we have a good idea what the result would be, so we can’t expect that to happen.
Thanks for articulating this, Streetguy. For now we just have the Minister’s claims, which sit oddly alongside the more focused local consultations. See for example p20 of this AT report, which shows a map of schools and communities that have requested safer speeds. https://at.govt.nz/media/1991808/63-draft-auckland-speed-management-plan-2024-2027.pdf
I want the same deal other bits of Auckland got. West Auckland is lumped in with the Shore in one of the congestion charging proposals, despite the Shore having a separate busway for over a decade now and the North Western having nothing of the sort.
Build the WEX busway, then wait a decade, then we can talk. Fair is fair.
West Auckland has had a double tracked railway since 2010.
Correct but what about the people from Hobsonville, Te Atatu Peninsula and Massey? They are not close to the railway lines
Yes, but neither are Titirangi, Hillsborough, Three Kings, Mangere, Howick, Botany.
It’s absurd to say we can’t have congestion charging out West because some suburbs in the NW don’t have good rapid transit today.
No, it’s having a basic grasp of equity. The fastest growing bits of West Auckland are effectively in a state of transport poverty.
It would be ethically bankrupt to price their access to the CBD at the same rate as the Shore, with it’s decade-plus old busway. We can discriminate by the corridor when it comes to road pricing, if you still want to charge areas without the same access to PT the same as those that have gold plated PT then you’re making a choice that says a lot about you as a person.
I get your main point but really no part of Auckland has “gold-plated PT” by international standards.
Being lumped in is a good thing. You have a much larger home zone.
In partial defence of the Manawatu locals, at no point until recently has tolling been discussed for this road. Had the option been put forward of a toll free 2+1 road with tighter curves or a tolled expressway they might have supported the former.
It also replaces the existing route (the Manawatu Gorge), whereas every tolled road previously has left the existing road as a free route.
Agree with Jezza – Manawatu gorge had to be closed due to repeated slips and hazards, so this ‘new’ highway is to replace that, not duplicate it. NZTA did themselves no favours by proposing a $4 toll though, potentially a lower charge at the beginning would have been more palatable?
SH2 in Tauranga will duplicate / bypass the old route, so IMO should be tolled. I noticed that NZTA are proposing a peak and offpeak price on this route also.
+1
+1 here too.
Surely we should be starting with the former regardless.
Tolls suck. Why pick on some roads, especially when they are almost all in Tauranga, while every other road is “free” (covered by fuel tax). Just increase fuel tax very slightly and use that instead, its much more efficient / simple / fair.
And we are transferring thirty million from language teaching (Te Reo, the only language from this place) to the numbers thing known as mathematics in the Pākehā language.
What is the advantage for a child growing up with more than one language? What is the help for retired people to keep their minds active? Learning new languages.
NOT MATHS. So tediously boring, no wonder we have bad statistics amongst our Rangatahi…they just prefer the more interesting things in life…colour, music, theatre, and yes there is numeracy in all of these things, but it is not the stupidest “language” ever invented…the numbers.
Hāpi rāmere
bā humbug
Honestly, as much as I’m for multilinguialism, I’m kinda pissed at the way Te Reo is being taught. I’ve tried a few of the govt subsidised courses and they seriously are a scam at best. I don’t think a single linguist/ language teacher was involved in actually writing the course.
Maybe school does it better? But from what I remember of school, languages were not being taught well at all in most classes. If you go to any private organisation that actually teaches languages, you will see the difference.
Maths is far from boring, and it’s a core skill, people make bad decisions because they can’t count. If we want to be a richer country, we need people that can count.
I speak 4 lanugages, 3 natively, and the fourth with C1 proffeciency, and was very keen on getting Te Reo under my belt. I will try again, when a suitable course comes up, or possibly I’ll just self study.
You’re criticising one good thing because the government cut funding for another good thing.
What you should be doing is criticising a government that doesn’t respect the value of Te Reo, not going along with their shell game.
Exactly, tax breaks for landlords not Maths is the problem.
Re the school speeds article: Rural schools in NSW set a good example we should follow. Variable speed limit signs, massive flashing lights, often a visible police presence, and the buses have flashers and a mandatory passing speed limit too. I’ve seen police cars parked at the bus stops too, ready to ping any idiots.
Good enforcement can do good things. The issue is that whenever the next govt (or other urgent priorities) reduce enforcement, the problem comes back. Designing road – particularly around places like schools – so speeds come down whether or not a policeman wants to ping you is the ethical thing.
It’s the difference between having a railing on your balcony and someone looking out to make sure visitors don’t get too close to the railing-less balcony.
One (mostly) fixes the problem. The other thing just band-aids it.
Or fining people for falling off the balcony. How smart would that be?
“contractors dodging traffic to fill the holes… safety as the main priority is also balanced with the desire to minimise disruption to road users”
First they ruin urban temporary traffic management by basing it on (important) rural road requirements to keep workers safe, instead of caring about the wider population and transport goals of modeshift. Then they stop caring about the workers on the rural roads.
Unethical beyond belief.
Well, eventually some worker gets killed, and then there will be lawsuits and changes back again. I agree it’s unethical – but of course your everyday user of the road has no legal recourse at all, because our system and our courts consider traffic deaths an unavoidable fact of reality.
I couldn’t believe it when the Airport extolled the virtues, via Twitter, of a bus stop “only 10mins walk away”.
I guess that could change if the Airport and AT start talking to each other and a bus stop is put there. But its just doubling down on the visionless approach to transport that both parties seem to compete on. The Airport has little incentive to push PT because parkng revenue is so large.
Although its pretty annoying when you are trying to get to the airport and the bus zigzags all over the place. I took the bus from Onehunga to Domestic and it took about 3 times longer than driving would.
Its amazing the scale of road project they can do for way less then the cost of putting rails back on Dominion road!
The road I think should be tolled is the Eathquake Gully motorway. It was an expensive exercise, has an existing parallel route and should it ever suffer from an earthquake it will cost a lot to repair so best we put some cents aside now.
100%, plus it’s a PPP – so the entire country is paying interest on it. If there was ever a case for tolling a road, transmission gully is it.
There are two roads – the original Coast road highway and the new Trans Gully highway. If you toll one and not the other, people will switch to the other one. So, the only (and best) solution is to toll both roads. Simple.
It’s easy to promote a huge road scheme by proposing tolls. It gets public support at the time, because it won’t open for a decade. And then locals can campaign against tolling and the taxpayers pay out to the foreign finance company that operates the road at a guaranteed future profit.
Nothing surprising here.
Grafton Footbridge sign: the future for the clip-ons?
This from 1news a fortnight ago with the Gov’t screwing PT again
And is their anyone out there that can tell me are these still being paid off by the Ratepayers of Auckland ?
As of 28/09/2024 the minister has officially announced speeds will be reversed. Good on him for delivering on an election promise it’s quite rare these days. As predicted Lucinda Rees and others articles and complaints had absolutely no effect on any decision it’s simply rambling. The decision is made purely based on politics and the consultation document. Expert reckons have just as much bearing over decisions as Joe blog public does it’s great to see democracy is still alive and well and glad to see someone is looking out for us shift workers.
Yes, great to see the chance of kids getting run over in front of schools go up! Hooray to encouraging teens to spend all day on their devices because it’s not safe to walk utside! Hooray for accelerating the climate collapse of human society so my generation gets to live out a Mad Max reality! Hooray for the crabs-in-a-bucket mentality!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZnGNRk8V0
Two items of interest, elevated rail albeit from a Canadian perspective.
And bikes down side roads.
Another clown that does not know the history of movement
1] Walking
2] Horse then cart
3] Bike , in varies forms
4] Trains
5] Cars
And we now have the same here with our leaders , my question how did the Simpleton brown get around as a Child did his Mummy carry him everywhere ? .
I was disappointed to see no more Lime bikes, I used to enjoy using them. I have joint/balance issues and can’t use the scooters. Hopefully bikes are reintroduced.