An interesting graph came up on the TransportBlog twitter feed a couple of weeks ago, courtesy of the Wall Street Journal:

US petrol demand

Pretty self-explanatory, but what you’re seeing is that gasoline (or petrol) consumption in the US grew until the mid-2000s, and has since fallen. The projections from the government’s Energy Information Administration, which a decade ago were assuming that people would keep consuming more and more petrol, started to change tack in 2010 (assuming pretty flat demand) and even more in 2014 (assuming that demand would keep falling). This is the long, slow decline of petrol demand in the US, although some might think that decline actually looks pretty fast.

There’s another graph that goes along with the one above – they both come from this report, page 246ish. The other graph looks at consumption of all oil products (“petroleum” as they call it in the US).

US oil demand

Here, the story is similar but with a slower decline expected (fuels like diesel and other uses of oil are likely to be less affected by the demand downturn).

The US report gives the following explanation (forgive the wall of text, apparently paragraph breaks were high on the government’s cost-cutting list when the GFC hit):

The decline in petroleum consumption, starting in 2006, was unexpected. In the case of energy, industry-standard benchmark projections are produced annually by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) in its Annual Energy Outlook. Revisions to those projections include the effects of unforeseen developments in the energy sector. Figure 6-2a shows U.S. petroleum consumption since 1950 and projected consumption from the 2006, 2010, and 2014 editions of the Annual Energy Outlook. Only nine years ago, EIA projected an increase in petroleum consumption during the subsequent 25 years. But events dramatically affected subsequent projections: by 2010, EIA had reduced both the level and rate of growth of its projection; its 2014 outlook now projects petroleum consumption to decline through 2030 after a slight increase over the next five years. The reversal in projected petroleum consumption is led by the reversal in actual and projected gasoline consumption (Figure 6-2b): the 2014 EIA projection of consumption in 2030 is 44 percent below the projection made in 2006. Actual gasoline consumption declined between 2006 and 2010 mainly due to the recession and rising fuel prices, but much of the revision to the 2030 levels reflects the largely unexpected fuel economy improvements stemming from the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and the Administration’s subsequent tightening of those standards. The 2014 projections further reflect the 2012 light-duty vehicle fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions rate standards, which apply to model years 2017 through 2025 [JP note: the Obama administration tightened the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards in the US for the first time since the 80s, incentivising US manufacturers to improve their woeful fuel economy]. The Administration’s fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for medium and heavy-duty trucks also contribute to the reduction in projected petroleum consumption between the 2010 and 2014 Outlooks.

Let’s look at the same stats for New Zealand. It’s a little tricky, since the MBIE hasn’t produced forecasts of oil and transport demand since 2011, but long story short they were still projecting pretty steady increases for transport fuels (mainly petrol) and oil demand at that time.

Historical statistics, though, show that NZ’s petrol consumption peaked in 2007 and have begun a slow decline since then (although 2014 figures, not yet out, are likely to show a slight uptick from lower petrol prices towards the end of the year).

NZ petrol demand

It seems pretty likely that New Zealand is going to see a long, slow decline in petrol demand as well.

Share this

20 comments

  1. If this continues it will be interesting to see how the front ending of motorway project funding through PPPs goes. It doesn’t seem like a sensible or fiscally responsible approach.

    1. Minister of Bridges – Simon Bridges, was quoted on a Radio NZ Insight documentary on Auckland issues this morning as saying the “the current funding model is sustainable for the next 10 years at least, and quite possibly beyond that”.

      So clearly, the Government doesn’t see petrol consumption (and thus a lower tax take) as a problem on their *current* watch as Government of the Day, although it might become something for them to address on the their *next* watch.
      As they gave away 10 years for future revenue to bring forward motorway projects in the runup to the last election.

      Either way, I certainly doubt Bridges will be around when and if it does become and issue.

      I guess Patrick & the guys might have some insight on the Ministers thinking?

  2. Sooner or later the cost of clean energy such as solar and turbine technologically advanced and will be competitve priced compare to fossil fuel.

  3. What the heck is happening with retail petrol prices? They seem to be heading up again, despite WTI oil falling to a new low of $44.84 a barrel today. There is a real disconnect here.

  4. Quite simple explanation of the US graph…..the GFC kicked in big time in the mid 2000’s, 2006 onwards people were losing houses and jobs in the millions. Hence less gas, less going to work, less running around, unaffordable.

      1. Sort of. The American housing bubble which preceded started in 2006. Main Street was on the down turn long before Wall Street

        1. Got any indicators on that? Unemployment rate generally shows what Main Street is feeling.

        2. Stateofworkingamerica.org/great-recession

          Does a great job of explaining these issues backed up with stats of the economy et al. It is too simplistic to think that the world fell off a cliff in 2008 without any causation.

          From the webpage ” … The median net worth of whites fell by around a third from 2004 to 2007, dropping from around $150,000 to around $100,000. The median wealth of blacks, historically much lower than that of whites, took an even bigger hit, dropping by over three-quaters from around $10,000 to $2,000.”

          It is impossible to gauge the strength of weakness of something as complicated as the U.S. labour market with one number. For that a host of measures is to be considered. Underemployment and the underutilisation of skill would be a good place to start if you would like to brush up on measures to understand economic trends

        3. A single number used to capture the strength of weakness of something as complicated as the U.S. Labour market is impossible. It’s important to consider a range of measures for the health of the economy .

          Also pointing to a single point in time, the GFC, and then comparing it to fuel consumption trends in some kind of gotcha moment is not going to give a true reflection. Nothing is black and white.

          Stateofworkingamerica.org/great-recession

          Does a great job of explaining these issues backed up with stats of the economy et al. It is too simplistic to think that the world fell off a cliff in 2008 without any causation.

          From the webpage ” … The median net worth of whites fell by around a third from 2004 to 2007, dropping from around $150,000 to around $100,000. The median wealth of blacks, historically much lower than that of whites, took an even bigger hit, dropping by over three-quaters from around $10,000 to $2,000″

          Underemployment and the underuse of economic capacity if you are interested is what I found to be a good topic to delve into if you are interested in the topic.

      2. The GFC reached critical mass in 2008, but in the five years prior millions of jobs in the OECD were destroyed or degraded by the gold rush to China. I had a ring side seat on that process as pre-sales network services analyst with AT&T with responsibility for Asia Pacific. From 2003 it was obvious to me the ‘center could not hold’ economically. If posted on this in various forums from 2003 onward. I lost all respect for economists (and neo-liberal economics in particular) from that time.

    1. And In the NZ case the uptake of diesel in passenger cars and SUVs.

      Is there a Diesel usage chart as well ?

  5. What year did Ford introduce the v6 F150 ute. That probably counts for half of the fuel improvements 🙂

  6. I suspect the proliferation of low cost airlines have quite a bit to do with this and have probably replaced the great American road trip.

    I also think the increasing use of diesel will also gave had an impact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *