Portland has something of a reputation as an urbanists poster child and my first impression is that it is indeed doing things right. Portland’s renaissance stems back ultimately to a local government amalgamation in the early 90s that led to a compact city master plan for the region that could actually be put into place (well the bits within Oregon state at least). This lead to a big focus on transit, walking and cycling and intensifying in the city. Some big parallels with the Auckland situation there, hopefully Portland represents what Auckland will achieve.

A few observations are immediate. They have short blocks, with lots of cross roads. That means lots of street frontage and lots of corners. Not much in the way of lanes or arcades, probably because they don’t need them. Most intersections are either four way stops with pedestrian priority, or signalised. I noticed that the ped signals appear to be synchronised on some of the main streets, I walked about eight blocks without breaking my stride!

There are a lot of street trees. Lots. They provide shade from the sun and make thing just that much more pleasant. I’m no arborist but those trees look young, perhaps only ten or fifteen years old. I get the feeling they were recently added in a citywide programme to tree every street in the city. Auckland should do the same. Also something that is not immediately obvious is they have very little fast food chains downtown… but they do have a permanent hawker/food truck market covering two city blocks!

Unlike Vancouver or Seattle the streets in Portland have a narrow cross section, probably 20m from building to building. That’s the same as Auckland. In a way it makes the streets more homely and intimate, especially as they aren’t choked with traffic. Broad footpaths, cycle lanes, tram tracks, trees, just not parking and dozens of traffic lanes. Again they intersections don’t splay out for extra lanes or turn pockets. If anyone tells you Auckland streets are too narrow for this or that, point to Portland.

Street parking is uncommon and I can’t recall many parking buildings, bar one particularly huge monster downtown. I wonder if that one building does most of the parking for the whole city?

Portland has both streetcar trams and proper light rail. There is a distinction here. The streetcars are conventional, relatively small 20m trams that run entirely on street. They are effectively flash buses with nice stops, and are great to ride, however they do run in mixed traffic. Downtown they run kerbside, with only one track per street. Opposing directions run on different streets one block apart which can be confusing at first. Frequencies are quite good at ten to fifteen minute head ways most of the day.

The light rail is a different beast. The vehicles are longer, taller and wider, and seem to run exclusively coupled into pairs. A pair like that is about the same size as a single EMU in Auckland, so it’s by no means small. While they do run on street downtown like the streetcars they use different streets and tracks and have a nominally traffic free lane. The killer app here however is that once outside the downtown grid the light rail runs on its own dedicated railway lines, generally located alongside freeways. So they have excellent, if a little slow, penetration into the dense city core, and fast long reach in the suburbs. I caught this out to the airport and it was faster and more convenient than many other airport rail links. There are four lines each running at ten minute headways, but in the centre they pair up on two corridors given very frequent service all day. A great system, and again it could be a very effective option for new corridors in Auckland.

I don’t have a picture of it, but there is one odd street with three lanes: streetcar to one side, light rail to the other, plus a bus lane in the middle!

20140609-160443-57883467.jpg

20140609-160443-57883669.jpg

A picture here of the Portland gondola, which they curiously call a tramway. Gondolas seem to be flavor of the month in transport terms, often they are an answer searching for a question with little regard given to their real life strengths and weaknesses. This application however does seem to be the right choice of technology. It serves a medical precinct and university built at the top of a very large, very steep hill, in an otherwise flat city. One of the streetcars terminates at the bottom station and there is a large paid bike parking lot, both of which give good access to the gondola.

Speaking of cycling, there is plenty of it but a conspicuous lack of segregated cycle lanes and cycle ways. Many city streets have painted-line-and-stencil bike lanes, and little else. Perhaps this is actually the holy grail for cycling: a city where cycling is such a normal, standard aspect of using the road, and where traffic is so light and civilized, that special cycling infrastructure just isn’t needed.

20140609-160546-57946299.jpg

20140609-160546-57946491.jpg

A quick picture of their new waterfront development precinct. Human scaled buildings, street trees, cycle lanes, public transport, mixed use, some parking, short blocks and small intersections. Wynyard take note, this is how you do it right.

20140609-160624-57984719.jpg

Overall Portland is a great city that clearly enjoys the fruits of its labours over the previous two decades. Auckland has a lot to learn from this city which rightly deserves it’s reputation as a golden child of reurbanisation.

Share this

12 comments

  1. That’s a really good point about the street trees. I remember them but hadn’t twigged (no pun intended) that it provides such a contrast to Auckland (though the fairly consistent mid-rise blocks in the town centre certainly helped as well). I enjoyed the street trees in Paris too. Definitely could be a project here.

    1. They don’t seem overly worried about the trees shorting out the electric overhead wires either by look of things.

      In Auckland it we had that the trees would be 5ft high “stumps” to “protect” the tram lines from the trees.

      Hope this comes here, I like to idea of those big Light Rail cars, The fronts look a big odd without any fairing at the front, more like some piece of industrial equipment.
      But they can obviously cope with the traffic in town. (or more to the point, the traffic copes with them) Maybe something like this for Quay St eventually?

      But of course this still needs its own lines, which calls the issue of isolating commuter rail from freight trains via the 3rd and 4th lines here to enable that.
      Assume this is what the Shore will get one day whe the Rail tunnels are built?

  2. What is the structure that goes over the road to the multi-storey carpark building in the first picture? Is it pedestrian bridge on really deep girders or a ramp?

  3. I had a short visit to Portland in 2010 (arriving by train from SF), and thought it was great. I felt it had a nicer, more intimate vibe than Seattle. There are trees everywhere in the city and the suburbs (at least the ones I saw), including even the poorer suburbs. The gondola was fairly new when I was there, and the bike storage area was installed more recently. The LR I used (Yellow line) ran on normal streets rather than next to a freeway, and the acceleration up steep hills was impressive. Because of the grid type layout, the system is designed to feed buses from the cross streets to the nearest LR station.

  4. The trees and flowers make such a difference, compared to Auckland where their idea of a modern streetscape seems to be bland grey bricks as far as the eye can see. Little contrast, nothing natural, no colour. I understand Auckland Council prefers little or no vegetation in order to avoid maintenance costs, but I would rather pay a little more to have it in place.

  5. I can’t comment on the overall quality of the transport infrastructure, but Portland is not a city we should emulate.

    It’s a sickening example of middle-class bourgeois gentrification… it’s hipster central and is regarded as the worst place in the world by anybody who doesn’t own a (a) fixy, (b) ironic moustache, (c) plaid shirt, or who doesn’t drink (d) Pabst Blue Ribbon.

    Auckland has to be careful that moving to the world’s most liveable city doesn’t tear out its heart. Its working class heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *