*This is a Guest Post by regular reader Warren Sanderson
 
 More specifically these are my impressions from three and a half weeks spent in four cities on the Pacific North West – Vancouver and Victoria in British Columbia and Seattle and San Francisco in the US. The first three cities were new to me and San Francisco was a re-acquaintance after some thirty years.

Although widely travelled, my wife and I have tended to overfly this area for more distant locations but with a strong interest in the development of the best public transport for Auckland and the frequent mention of Vancouver and Seattle in my daily read of the Auckland Transport Blog, I felt that it was time to check this out for myself.

Vancouver

canada-line-vancouver-skytrain copy

We arrived first into Vancouver and moved straight from the Terminal Building to the Skytrain Canada Line platform and purchased tickets to Vancouver City Centre from the ticket machine . The line was elevated to Yaletown Roundhouse which gave us a great view but the last section was underground below the city centre. The fare was $9 per person and the ride was very smooth. It was 2.35pm in the afternoon and throughout the train almost all seats were taken, but we had no trouble accommodating our suitcases and nor did other airport arrivals. However we did not see any special suitcase racks such as you get on the Heathrow express and some European trains.

On another day (without bags) we rode the Expo Line, the full length from the Waterfront to the end of the line at King George – some 20 stops in total. Again, it was elevated on reinforced concrete piers, so after emerging from the city tunnelling the views were absolutely excellent. At one point it crossed the Fraser River on its own bridge for a spectacular view each way. This was a mid-morning trip and I would say the train was three quarters full with people, for most of the journey. The train emptied out at Surrey Central (19th stop) where there was a shopping mall and few remained on board to the final stop at King George which seemed to be a big parking lot – presumably park and ride. Fare $5.10 per person each way.

One city station is directly below Macy’s Department Store and the Pacific Centre with its luxury shops, so travellers exit through these points. No wonder Precinct Properties are keen to support and benefit from Auckland’s Central Rail Link when it is built.

We also took the SeaBus to North Vancouver. This was a single level and very wide, fully enclosed ferry designed to cater for large numbers with a 15 minute journey time and a 15 minute timetable. Mid-morning it was only about half full.

vancseabus

Victoria – British Columbia’s Capital                           Population 330k

From Vancouver by means of bus to Tsawwassen, ferry through the spectacular island dotted waters to the ferry terminal on Vancouver Island at Swartz, from where we had a diversion to the wonderful Butchart Gardens and then to Victoria itself. Coming from the landward side Victoria is not impressive and looks very automobile dependent but the old town around the harbour is most impressive with marvellous buildings like the Empress Hotel and British Columbia’s Parliament House set on spacious lawn frontages looking on to the very walkable and people friendly harbourside. Some commercial buildings in the old town probably don’t have the commercial significance that they did 60 years ago as they have lost out to periphery developments, but they are attractive with some looking for a new function.

victoria-skyline copy
Victoria skyline

A local person told me that some form of railed public transport has been mooted for Victoria but nothing seems to happen because too many people think the population is not large enough and cars will do.

Victoria Canada
Victoria Canada

Seattle

We arrived by boat and shortly thereafter visited the 76 storey Columbia Centre which is considerably higher than the Space Needle built for the 1962 World Fair and allows a marvellous view:

Columbia Centre View Seattle

Right along Seattle’s waterfront is the elevated Alaskan Highway Viaduct. Constructed in 1953 in reinforced concrete it is a three lane, two- tier structure with one level going west and the other east. This highway was earthquake damaged in 2001 and the portion through the city is to be torn down and replaced by a tunnel 2 miles in length but with only two lanes each way. A small section of the Viaduct has already been demolished but most remains open for vehicles in the meantime. TBM “Bertha” commenced tunnelling this year with a 14 month construction time envisaged.

Seattle- Alaskan Way
Seattle- Alaskan Way

0313-mudroom-tunnel-mockup copy

All this has given Seattle a big opportunity to reconnect with Elliott Bay, as its foreshore is known and big plans are in hand to enhance the whole area as a people friendly place.

We used ferries on two successive days. A small ferry miscalled a water taxi, took us to West Seattle and back some 3 hours later. Then, as a day trip, the much larger Washington State Ferry took us to Bainbridge Island at the amazingly low cost of $US 3.85 for a senior, for the 35 minute trip. And all journeys back from the island are free. No wonder they don’t make a profit.

We did not use either buses or trains in Seattle but we explored 2 underground stations to watch the movements in the Transit Tunnel under 3rd Street which is shared by diesel buses, trolley buses and light rail. The light rail goes all the way to SeaTac Airport at a modest cost. In the late afternoon there seemed to be plenty of activity, with more buses than trains passing through. I suppose it worked satisfactorily, although it seemed a bit weird with the two modes in the same very wide tunnel with ordinary kerbing and no rail platforms. Once again entry to the system at one of the stations, was through Nordstrom’s, Seattle’s most upmarket department store.

Seattle Transit Tunnel
Seattle Transit Tunnel

Apart from what I was told as the “rather useless monorail” there was also a streetcar route known as the Lake Union Trolley which went from the centre of town to freshwater Lake Union. We used this on four occasions and found it spartanly comfortable and a very satisfactory means of public transport. I think something very similar would be highly successful along our own Dominion Road as proposed in the Congestion Free Network.

In our limited experience, public transport in Seattle seemed a rather many modal mixed bag, which is probably the case for historical reasons, but I guess it works. There are aspects we could learn from Seattle and they are in a transition pattern at the moment, with big changes in prospect, following the demolition of the Alaska Highway Viaduct.

San Francisco

i_bart_sf_hoodie-r79669508db1247738bf95f7a0f63f12c_8nhm7_324 copy

After arrival by air on a Friday mid-afternoon we took the Bay Area Rapid Transport (Bart) to the Embarcadero train stop near to the Ferry Building. It was a smooth ride, quick, not too crowded and with plenty of room for our bags.

One of the downsides of public transport is the threat of strikes. While in San Francisco Bart employees were threating to strike with potential dire consequences for commuters on the Oakland side of the harbour, because the Bay Bridge is pretty much at capacity with existing vehicle traffic. Fortunately, by Mayoral decree, a 30 day cooling off period was invoked at the 11th hour, but the dispute is yet to be resolved.

We used the rattling old streetcars that run round to Fisherman’s Wharf on several occasions and enjoyed a couple of the famous cable car rides which I thought were expensive at $6 a time for comparatively short rides. And we used the ferry to visit Sausalito with America’s Cup racing yachts very much in evidence en route.

Bay-Area-Rapid-Transit5 copy

Ticket Machines

These were varied in operation – some gave change, some didn’t – some merely wanted you to use your credit card – some like Bart had variable fares depending on distance. There was the question of whether you could buy for two adults at one go or had to buy individually, senior fares and so on. As a 77 year old I didn’t find them particularly user friendly, especially as I was concerned not to delay other people while I figured it out. However, to be fair we did get some assistance from fellow travellers on occasion.

If you are a local you get to know the system but new methodology with each fare purchase can be challenging. I longed for the ease of London’s Oyster Card.

Architecture

Two observations!

Vancouver_02 copy

As noted in this Blog, Vancouver certainly had many apartment buildings of up to 23 storeys in the area in which we stayed. I don’t think many were any higher than that. One thing that impressed me visually was that quite a number incorporated a warm red brick in a skilful way to relieve the stark monoculture concrete exteriors of so many taller buildings. Sometimes it solidified the base floors, or established main door hierarchy or sometimes emphasised the edges of the building as corner panels in the manner of quoins. It seemed to give a modern friendly face to these buildings rather than a modern grey coldness and this despite that they are on Pacific rim and subject to earthquakes.

Woodwards Bld Vancouver
Woodwards Bld Vancouver

Brick was also prominent in the refurbished warehouse district of Yaletown, now full of restaurants and all of this provides some visual warmth in a cold climate.

So bring back some brick, I say………………

Seattle_-_3rd_Ave_01
3rd Ave Seattle

In Seattle’s main street (3rd Avenue) I was most impressed with the quality and solidity of most of the buildings. With solid stone bases they certainly weren’t going to fall over. And then just off the main street I noticed two or three that had been subjected to facadism of a sort. The solid base two or three storeys had been retained and the buildings extended upward but retaining design integrity with the base. And visually it worked!   I would not normally support facadism  but these did not look out of place.

Finally

We did not have one day of rain in the period we were away and enjoyed bright sunshine all the time. I know it is not always like that.  But just like the Blog my favourite city was Vancouver.

vancouver sky
Vancouver
Share this

21 comments

  1. More brick would be nice but Auckland is more a cheap, concrete type city I am afraid. Our most noticeable landmark looks like a pile of concrete sewer pipes stacked into a tower!

    What were the streets there like in terms of signage? One thing in Auckland is the number of signs and poles and billboards and so on. Lots of visual and physical clutter. We do have some nice old buildings about, just just can’t see them through all the clutter a lot of the time. Try photographing them and you really notice this.

    Simon

    1. I don’t know about Canada, but the US goes nuts with signs. Worse than here. This is an access road to a beach in Marin County just north of San Francisco – with no-parking signs every 20 metres or so: http://goo.gl/maps/3ki6d

      I particularly like, though, that some things are not just required: they’re Required By Federal Law: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SfT1b4QWx5A/TuN-Wm0x7vI/AAAAAAAAFds/VWAhQqCBxeU/s320/muni+1.jpg

      There’s even a little sign when you get on the bus in SF telling you how many years in prison you get for assaulting the driver (unfortunately I can’t find a picture).

  2. Wonderful and really useful record of your trip – thank you. I went on Vancouvers Skytrain on the day it opened about 30 years ago – glad to hear it is still working well. Also most interested to hear of the Light Rail and Bus traffic sharing the same tunnel in Seattle – and I hope that you did take the MonoRail there. Agreed, mostly useless, but that is really only cos it goes only one stop. If they had ever extended it, it could have had a more relevant life. Built for the 59 Worlds Fair it must be getting pretty cranky by now… From memory, it was a helluva lot more useful than Sydney’s monorail, as the cars could take more than a handful at a time….

  3. Very interesting post, thanks Warren; that Transit Tunnel does look odd, though from memory aren’t the buses diesel/electric hybrids that switch to electric only when underground? Ah yes, first they were trolleys now hybrids: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downtown_Seattle_Transit_Tunnel

    This was the kind of mashup that people were proposing for Britomart… One good outcome I guess from the decades of bickering and dithering in Auckland is that we waited so long that we are now doing it properly…

    Any others experienced this highly mixed mode structure in Seattle? Does work OK? Transit mode share not that high, especially compared to Canadian cities.

    1. Not sure about the mixed mode tunnel, but would it make sense to do two separated tunnels at the same time considering a bus tunnel will no doubt be needed soon? There must be a big cost advantage?

    2. In its original form, the DSTT ran dual-mode diesel/trolleybus coaches through the tunnel. At entrances to the tunnel, the trolley poles were released by the driver and guided onto the wire by inverted-V-shaped metal sheets sometimes called pie pans. The trolley OCS was removed when light rail was introduced, and now the buses are all diesel-electric hybrids with a special ultra-lean-burn mode for use in the tunnel, and the trolleybus routes run on the surface.

      The joint-operation tunnel system works well most of the time, although it could work much better if our two agencies could get their act together and figure out how to make the buses operate on a pre-pay system, and Metro would switch our buses to passive-restraint wheelchair seating. A tunnel trip saves a bus about five minutes, on average, compared to a north-south traversal of the CBD on 3rd Ave, our principal surface transit street. Internal Metro studies suggest that joint operations can continue until train headways reach five minutes, which will likely happen around 2021.

    1. Interesting idea there. Why not run a bus tunnel from Customs St and into Britomart while we’ve got Albert St / QE Square all dug up? I don’t know where you would exit them though?

  4. That tunnel diameter is huge. I’m not a transport engineer, but I do know that a single line of rail going either way would provide the same as eight lanes of vehicle traffic going either way – a fourfold increase. The tunnelling requirements for trackspace and associated utilities would be considerably less. Half, perhaps?

    (However, congratulations to them on attempting to open up their city. And let’s be thankful we never got a proposed waterfront motorway in Auckland.)

    As for brick cladding, it terrifies me. The thought of being in the streets in a moderate to large quake, with thousands and thousands of small missiles raining down on me fills me with fear. My grandmother experienced the 1931 Napier Earthquake, in which her entire brick school collapsed on the teachers inside. The children were out playing and survived. As a result my own family looks on brick buildings with dread rather than warm nostalgia. There’s a very strong tendency away from brick of any kind in NZ. Regulations prevent it from being used in many applications, and I’m sure it’s not allowed on tall buildings. There’s a case for progressive urbanism and interesting building claddings, but let’s remember where we live. That’s something the people of the Pacific Northwest seem to have forgotten.

    1. With all due respect engineering has changes quite a bit in 82 years, there are ways to make brick A LOT safer. It is also important to note the difference between using brick as a construction material, and as an architectural material.

      1. Good points Sailor Boy. The use of brick in such an aesthetically interesting way, that I was referring to, was on a good many very new buildings. I did give Patrick poorly photographed examples of what I had in mind but he has wisely chosen better photographs but in the main of older buildings tho’ still lovely older buildings!

        1. Here in Auckland a brick wall on a largish building that I have always admired are the end walls of what was originally the Intercontinental Hotel and I believe is now the Pullman Hotel on the corner of Princes Street and Waterloo Quadrant. Always looks good when walking up Princes Street and particularly so when the sun is shining on it.

  5. Historically there haven’t been all that many un-rendered brick buildings in Auckland. The best was the Victoria Arcade (Alfred Smith, 1885), on the corners of Queen, Shortland and Fort Streets which was demolished by the corporate barbarians at the BNZ in 1978, shortly before they vandalised by facading their extremely impressive Tasmanian sandstone bank (Leonard Terry, 1866-67) across the road, see: http://www.aucklandartgallery.com/the-collection/browse-artwork/6706/queen-street,-auckland. Others that survive include the Whau Lunatic Asylum now the main Unitec building, (Bartlett, James Wrigley and Phillip Herepath, 1863-1877), the Auckland Girls’ Grammar School building (Goldsbro’ & Wade, and W A Cumming, 1908-1909) and the former Jubilee Institute for the Blind Building in Parnell (Edward Bartley, 1908-1909). But unlike Sydney with its plethora of Pyrmont sandstone buildings, we haven’t used our local rock, volcanic basalt, to any great effect although the Mt Eden prison building (P F M Burrows, 1862-1917) and the scoria buildings designed in the 1850s by Frederick Thatcher for the Anglican church in Mission Bay, Parnell and Meadowbank demonstrate its extraordinary potential as a building material.

  6. It’s a pity you missed the other PNW city of note: Portland, OR. It’s home to several light rail lines with feeder buses, plus an aerial tram thingy. I preferred it over Seattle and SF.

  7. Warren, thanks for the great post about PT in cities on the West Coast. Interesting reading your fare costs in Vancouver (where I am heading on Friday for my second visit). Were you aware of the day pass? Cost is $9.50 and you can ride all buses, Skytrain and the Seabus as many times as you like for this fare. Even better, if you purchase one from the 7-eleven at the airport on arrival you can use it on the Canada Line from the airport and avoid the $5 penalty fare which is added to single tickets from the airport station. Vancouver are introducing a smart card (hopefully smarter than AT HOP) but not until October I believe.

    1. Thanks Julie Anne – we have made progress but we need the Congestion Free Network before any RonS so there is still work to be done!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *