The notice of requirement hearing for the City Rail Link project began yesterday – marking an important phase in securing the necessary resource consents to both protect the route and then enable the project’s construction. Compared to other major transport projects in recent times (Waterview Connection comes to mind as the best example) the consenting process for CRL seems to have been fairly low-key and almost slipping by without much notice. I think this reflects that the vast bulk of the project is in a tunnel (thus minimising its effects) and that the public strongly supports the project generally.

This is of course not to say that the project doesn’t have any effects which will need careful management. This was picked up in an article in yesterday’s NZ Herald:

Neighbours of Auckland’s underground rail project fear digging up Albert St and closing its key east-west intersections will spread traffic chaos through the inner city.

New World supermarket operator Foodstuffs wants Auckland Transport to withdraw a route protection application unless it tunnels under Albert St instead of spending two years digging up most of the road for a covered trench for two railway lines.

The council organisation, which says the tracks will be too shallow and the ground too riddled with service lines to tunnel below Albert St, will today open its case to designate a 3.4km route from Britomart to Mt Eden.

There is an amusing irony that the transport projects which will do more than anything else ever to improve transport in the CBD will potentially have quite significant impacts on traffic during construction. To an extent I think the phrase “short term pain for long term gain” applies here. Plus the traffic impacts will be limited to the section of Albert Street where cut and cover tunnelling is necessary – as well as around the stations.

Tunnelling consultant Bill Newns says in evidence prepared for the designation hearing – which is expected to take about two weeks – he expects a complete closure of the Victoria St intersection for up to 18 months and of Wellesley St for 12 months, followed by a full or partial closure of Customs-Albert Sts for up to nine months.

Auckland Transport traffic consultant Ian Clark recommends the full closure of just one intersection at a time, while maintaining east-west movements elsewhere across Albert St.

I think the impacts on Albert Street can be managed through better utilisation of those giant semi-motorways Hobson/Nelson and also ensuring that buses going along Albert Street retain their bus lanes. What is potentially a bigger problem is the closing of the key intersections along Albert Street: Customs, Victoria and Wellesley:

crl-crossstreets
The dark blue section of the route above is to be built as a cut and cover tunnel (requiring Albert Street to be dug up) while the orange section will be dug out using a tunnel boring machine and avoid impacting on the road above. The three red arrows indicate the key east-west streets.

One way of reducing the impact of the project on Albert Street and on the key east-west streets is to take advantage of the recent announcements relating to the downtown shopping mall site redevelopment – which will see the very first section of the CRL begin construction within the next three years – and push that section of tunnel a little further to go under Customs Street. Something like this:

customs-street
Building the tunnel to the south of Customs Street as part of this first phase would mean that one of the three key intersections wouldn’t need to be touched at all during the main construction phase of the project – potentially significantly reducing impact on traffic in the city centre. Furthermore, a tunnel with reasonable length could be useful as a train storage area during the peak times removing some of the conflicting train movements and potentially opening up another couple of train slots or at least providing for more flexibility in operations.

Of course there are always cost inefficiencies from building projects like this bit by bit. But we should at least weigh up the operational benefits it could provide as well as the traffic mitigation benefits of not having to dig up Customs Street during the main construction phase.

Today there was more coverage of the hearings and in particular the issues at the other end of the project.

Auckland Council officers fear noise from blasting rock from the Mt Eden end of the city’s underground rail project may seriously damage fragile buildings.

Council body Auckland Transport wants hearing commissioners to allow up to 150 decibels of noise around unoccupied buildings to blast away extensive basalt deposits near where it intends joining a pair of rail tunnels to the western line. That is similar to the noise of a jet on takeoff, which can rupture unprotected ear-drums.

A report by council principal planner Ross Cooper quoted a consultant’s opinion that 150 decibels would create an unacceptably high risk “of windows and other fragile building elements being damaged or destroyed”.

It will be very interesting to hear how the hearing progresses over the next two weeks.

Share this

23 comments

    1. “Auckland Council officers fear noise from blasting rock from the Waterview end of the city’s underground motorway project may seriously damage fragile buildings.

      Council body Auckland Transport wants hearing commissioners to allow up to 150 decibels of noise around unoccupied buildings to blast away extensive basalt deposits near where it intends joining a pair of motor way tunnels to the north western motorway. That is similar to the noise of a jet on takeoff, which can rupture unprotected ear-drums.

      A report by council principal planner Ross Cooper quoted a consultant’s opinion that 150 decibels would create an unacceptably high risk “of windows and other fragile building elements being damaged or destroyed”.

      YEAH RIGHT!

      1. Funny that: living some 750m away to the west of the Owairaka end of the Waterview Traffic Sewer I can report that we’ve had 6+ months of rock drills, at it from 07:30 to 18:30, Monday to Saturday, Surprisingly enough, by contrast, the blasting was relatively quiet. However, the most irritating noise is made by the constant sound truck warning beepers. About a week ago, the contractors decided to up the level of irritation and the site now seems to be active 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We now have a mix of constant truck beepers, interspersed by non specific plant noise and garnished during daylight hours by rock drills. Auckland Council officers would appear to be unconcerned.

  1. Will the new bit of the CRL west of the current Britomart platforms have extra dead-end lines/tracks in the middle, like there currently is at Britomart? i.e. 3, 4 or five sets of tracks, or just 2?

  2. I don’t care about traffic disruption. However this is going to seriously disrupt all retail and office activity in the area for a lengthy period. Is there a risk that we end up with a business-free wasteland by the time construction is finished? We have plenty of experience constructing large-scale horizontal infrastructure in the suburbs where the low density means that few people are effected badly. This is probably the first time in a long while that we’ve driven a major project right through the CBD.

    Are they likely to close one block at a time for a few months, then reopen it and progress to the next block?

    1. I remember being in HK, 12 or so years ago, and watching them just close a street and dig a bloody great hole while they were building a new MTR line. They would just close off 100m, or so, of road and dig. That’s how they get things done so quickly. Short, sharp pain rather than being numbed for much longer.

    2. The disruption shouldn’t be any worse than during the construction of the sky tower and casino complex.

      1. But the Casino brings economic activity. The CRL doesn’t.

        [Sorry just a dig at the old saw of anti-PT comments – bring on the short sharp shock – much better than dragging it out]

  3. Actually the really interesting question is about what sort of form is best for Albert St when they put it back together. Will have to post on this as it is not a straightforward issue as Albert has those slip lanes and far too many car crossings- it’s quite a complicated street. Big shame that the multi story car parks that have destroyed what used to be a great urban place; the Victorian alley of Durham Lane, ever got consented…. ah well yet another violation from the age of automania…..

  4. I have no idea why the blasting need be 150 decibels, or why they are talking decibels with reference to building damage. The standards are in terms of peak particle velocity

  5. Would it help if a Bailey bridge was installed at the intersection being worked on? Cut and cover around it, then move it up the road?

    1. Would need a very long, very massive, very wide bailey bridge to be worth it. Plus, you’d still have the issue of not being able to work under it until you are at least 5+ m below it.

      Probably not worth it, especially as the idea is to rip it open, dig down as fast as you can, build a roof over it as soon as you ARE down deep enough, and then finish the work underground at a more relaxed pace, with traffic already passing on top again.

  6. Given that the CRL is two tracks wide, but Albert St is five lanes, will we ever actually need to close the whole width of the street? It seems like it should be wide enough that a couple of lanes can still stay open even when a section of roadway is being dug up.

  7. Yeh AT do intend to keep one lane open each way, and a footpath each side. However the big issues are at the cross streets to Albert, especially Victoria and Wellesley.
    They should be able to keep 2 narrow lanes on the cross streets most of the time. One of the methods suggested at the open day was for at the intersections a roof would be built first, then excavation done underneath. This would be more expensive, but reduce disruption.

  8. Ahhh, good old New Zealand. Just seems like a country of hicks worried about the sky falling in on them. Unless, of course, it’s a roading/motorway project.

  9. Close the street to traffic while you dig it up. Once it’s done, no need to open it back to traffic, drivers will have figure out alternatives and you can travel that stretch by train now. Instead open it up as a pedestrian shopping and eating district.

  10. When the MRT was constructed by cut & cover through chinatown in Singapore about 12 years ago, steel beams were placed across the road with the road remaining open on top while construction carried on underneath. It must have been like this for a year or so in any one place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *