Two weeks ago an article in my local paper caught my attention. The article was in relation to the security of bikes locked up at train stations.

As mayor Len Brown strives to convince Aucklanders to stop using cars some of Auckland’s most eco-friendly commuters are calling for more safety measures to protect bikes.

Robyn Rakich’s grandchildren Jordan and Yanya both used to cycle from New Lynn to Fruitvale Road Railway Station to get to school.

The Rakichs would chain their bikes up behind the tennis club at the train station because it was the only realistic place for them to do so.

But on May 16 they returned from school to find Jordan’s bike stolen.

The theft highlights concerns over the safety of bikes at West Auckland’s stations.

Ms Rakich says the theft was very upsetting because the BMX was a joint Christmas and birthday present and now the pair have to walk to the station instead.

“I know that there are secure bike lockers at New Lynn station but I never wanted them to cycle there, it’s far too dangerous with all the traffic.

“If all railway stations had somewhere safe to store their bikes this thing wouldn’t be happening,” she says.

I have long thought having more secure bike parking at stations would be a very good idea. Bikes complement the rail network very well by helping to extend it’s reach and of course takes up a lot less space than car parks. I’m clearly not the only one who things this way:

Every railway station in Auckland has some form of cycle parking but many are limited to just cycle stands.

Of West Auckland’s 10 railway stations only New Lynn station has a covered cycle parking facility with separate lockers for cyclists to secure helmets and bags.

But the Cycle Action Auckland group says more needs to be done to encourage public transport use.

Chairwoman Barbara Cuthbert wants to see secure undercover parking installed for all bus and train stations around the city.

“Providing proper facilities for cyclists would strengthen our whole public transport network,” she says.

Busway has shown us that security and covered parking is the biggest concern for people leaving their bikes at stations.”

But the part that caught my attention was this:

Auckland Transport Media manager Mark Hannan says they are looking to implement covered cycle cages, or parkiteers, at some stations, similar to those found in Melbourne and parts of Europe.

“The first stations to be provided with this facility will be Papakura and Papatoetoe on the southern line and construction is already under way,” Mr Hannan says.

“This trial is taken from similar schemes operating in Melbourne and on other rail corridors overseas. Improvements in cycle parking on western rail stations is something we are looking at investing in.”

Auckland Transport says it is also working to improve access to railway stations.

This includes the Whau Greenways Network Plan involving safer links to stations.

This is excellent news and cycle cages are exactly what I thought would be ideal at stations so I got in touch with AT for some more details. Construction at Papakura and Papatoetoe starts this week while at Onehunga the existing cycle racks will receive a cover over them. The cages have been designed and manufactured in New Zealand and have the capacity for 20 bikes. They will be locked for security, only accessible with a card. Unfortunately it doesn’t appear that the card used to access the cages will be a HOP card but I’m sure AT will clarify what is required when they are ready to be used. If the trials are successful then the cages are likely to be rolled out to other stations and hopefully then they can be integrated with the HOP system to make them easy to use for everyone. And here is what they look like:

Cycle cages

As I said earlier, this is excellent and the type of Park n Ride I would much rather see (compared to massive Park n Rides for cars). I really hope it will be a success and will definitely be keeping an eye on them.

Share this

33 comments

  1. Yes, I’ve been looking everywhere for information about the Whau Greenway and have been enormously frustrated; not a blip pops up on the search engines! I guess I should just accept the fact that, institutionally, AT doesn’t think that the ordinary stakeholder’s interest in its activities is all that important.

  2. I hope they’re not too expensive per space – I’d love to see many more of these! Every station with a decent passenger count could justify one, or even two.

    1. Sadly, they are quite expensive. While providing a park&ride car park costs around A$10,000, one bike parking space in each of these costs them around A$4000 dollars (one of the Melbourne Parkiteer cages on which these are based costs around $100,000!)

      http://www.atrf.info/papers/2009/2009_Martin_denHollander.pdf

      Not sure whether that high price means someone is heavily clipping the ticket, but I HAVE heard comments from some folks in AT saying that they felt they could do better than Parkiteer. Maybe they meant price-wise?

        1. Not really, Geoff – doesn’t work. Video cameras and office windows aren’t attended (enough), or places like London would have licked theft and vandalism after installing a couple hundred thousand CCTV cameras. They haven’t.

          Roofs and locks aren’t overkill at all. Its just whether they have to be quite that expensive per bike… that said, 1/10th of the space of a car and 1/3rd or so the price of a car park – still a bargain. Just not cheap.

  3. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands: http://magicbulletmango.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/dutch-railways-and-cycling-happy.html

    This is so overdue, but strange that it begins with such a soft trial. What does it cost to implement much more sheltered bike parking at all major transit nodes, relative to everything else in the budget? What novel, original findings can AT hope to discover about parking bicycles in train stations?

    The small matter of neighbourhood access to these facilities bears emphasis. I’d rather the few millions of cycling dollars available were spent improving local streets to hook up with PT, before squandering it on duplicate paths beside motorways. Long trips are best left to integrated PT, as a first priority. (Winding nature trails can be nice to have too, but are perhaps of lesser utility.)

    A nice gesture. Let’s see if it adds up.

    1. Reserving spaces has been shown in overseas schemes to be very inefficient. Because many users don’t use it every day, it essentially wastes capacity. The trick is finding out how many access codes one can give out before the scheme becomes over-used. I would expect that a 30 bike cage could serve 50 people…

      1. I would agree that reservation is probably not the way to go. I guess one would still need to lock their bike to stop thieves that had a key.

  4. Looks good.
    The boxes on the busway are amazing, but I don’t feel that there are enough. This is a huge improvment as security is my greatest concern.

  5. Not really a huge fan of these cages myself. Certainly I don’t see why they are really necessary – Japan doesn’t use them (http://katesensei.blogspot.se/2011/07/and-bicycles-and-mama-chariots.html for examples of bike parking there). Sweden also doesn’t use them and I’ve not really seen them too extensively around Europe. It seems to be something that North America is quite fond of more than anything else and I don’t think their cycling culture is something that Auckland should be looking at.

    Do you all really feel they are that necessary? If you just ride a regular, bog standard bike, not one of the lycra-brigade super bikes with bells and whistles, it probably needs nothing more than a nice pole and a simple lock for parking.

    Final point. If they are to be integrated with HOP, doesn’t that take away a bit of the security aspect if anyone with a HOP card can access the cages or are they thinking about restricting it to pre-paid contract users only?

    1. They certainly seem a bit of an interim thing, its true. As Marcus says, once you get into a scenario with thousands of people cycling, then cages become replaced either by bike parking garages like in Amsterdam, or the bike security is replaced by bikes being cheap and so commonplace, people won’t worry about them being left at the station…

      Right now, I think they will be useful for Auckland, but certainly not a silver bullet.

    2. Japan and Sweden also have some of the lowest rates of criminality in the world.

      I ride a road bike that would cost 2.5k new to the bus station every day, I don’t feel comfortable with it locked against the pole. This is a practical choice as I live about 4 kiometres from the station and the ride is more comfortable on the road bike, and I cannot afford to buy an extra bike.

      A pole simply isn’t enough in NZ.

    3. agree. In many cities in Italy as well as in the rest of Europe most of the train stations have seas of old battered bikes used by commuter and students. In Italy sometimes I didn’t even bother chaining the bike cause I knew when I’d be back back it wouldn’t have been there anymore. And you just pick another one.
      Every couple of months the council would leave some posters around for few days announcing that all the broken bicycles left overnight in a particular day would be removed to clean up the thing and then sold at an auction. Easy way to build up a new cheap commuter.

  6. To be fair, the quoted article provides an anecdote of a child’s bike being stolen. However, I agree that the cage concept is unfortunate. While shelter from the elements is worthwhile, security in a public space should largely be due to social surveillance by locals and other users. Auckland’s train stations rarely offer that kind of environment, though, so I can see why the design fences bikes off — this is a typical, self-fulfilling response underlying much of Auckland’s token cycling and pedestrian amenity (“the conditions are bad, so we made bad infrastructure”).

    1. I totally agree. Cycle cages that are unmonitored simply provide a convenient one stop shop for the best bikes for thieves with bolt cutters and a stolen HOP card. I have said it before, and I’ll say it again – station masters. If we got over our horror at actually hiring people and parked our search for technological panaceas for security, then at the busier stations a simple cycle cage and a station master in a little station house who can see it beats squadzillions spent on cameras, monitoring centres, etc etc.

  7. An access card, but not a Hop card. Pure Fail, AT. All you need to do is a lookup on the Hop serial and determine if it’s an authorised card for cycle access. You can even charge nominal rental. Why reinvent the wheel?

    1. Why introduce extra complexity and security risk when those people who want to leave their bikes in one of the cages can get a separate access card. That’s why I would prefer.

      1. Really, another card? I’m doing my best to get rid of cards from my wallet. Surely the HOP card can be used.

      2. Extra complexity?

        What extra complexity?

        We are suggesting that the AT HOP card be used to access lockers = no extra complexity. You are suggesting an additional card = extra complexity.

        1. Maybe he is referring to the fact that snapper could sue AT over the cycle cage not taking their card? That would add a lot of complexity :-/

        2. No they couldn’t.

          AT would be allowing access to AT facilities using an AT card.

          By that same logic Westpac, or Flybuys, or Farmers, or Foodstuffs could sue because their cards won’t work. Snapper isn’t a PT card, it is just a somplified debit card.

  8. This is a fantastic development. I am just about to rent a secure bike space in the Britomart carpark to cut down my walking time from the station to work – so hopefully this trial gets extended. I think the more of this type of thing the better.

  9. The new cage at Papakura is being placed on the other side of the tracks as the guy who is security in the park and ride park. There is space next to his portacom for ten bikes. I guess the new cage is on the town side of the bridge but it could have been placed next to the carpark guys shack…Why couldn’t they have been individual lock ups.

  10. Those robotic bike storage systems in Japan cost about NZD$10 a month, would be interesting how many here would be prepared to pay for such a service, rather than simply hoping things are provided.

  11. I’d be for this. Got my bike nicked last week at Onehunga station, under the eyes of CCTV, and will now be locking up my new (second hand) d-clamped bike with some anxiety.

    These cages look a bit ugly and ideally we’d live in the commuter dream that is suburban Japan etc – loved parking my granny bike in a sea of others outside Nagoya, but until that day these would be reassuring. Alternatively as a cheaper (?) solution, increased lighting and CCTV specifically in the bike area as a deterrent would be good.

    As for the card question, I don’t care. If a separate card system makes it that little bit more trouble for thieves to get in, great. Otherwise individual registration using HOP cards makes sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *