One interesting element of the new Outer Link bus service is that it operates at the same frequency all the time: one bus every 15 minutes. This is pretty unusual for a bus service, as typically you see a huge increase in service frequency at peak times and then a big drop-off during off-peak times. Obviously demand is ‘peaked’, and we’re already starting to see Outer Link buses being filled up (only yesterday one drove past me in Herne Bay because it was too full to pick up passengers), but it seems the point of keeping frequency the same whenever the service runs is to ensure we get good off-peak frequencies – enabling people to think about using PT for more than just the trip to work.

Personally I think the Outer Link will need to add additional peak time capacity in the not too distant future, which will mean a shift away from its “same frequency all the time”. But you can go too far the other way, with peak frequencies being good but off-peak frequencies being fairly rubbish (most of Auckland’s bus routes are like this). While demand is obviously the highest at peak times, providing peak time services are really expensive (because you need to own the bus and employ the driver for just a few trips a day), so you really want to be sure that the balance between peak and off-peak services is nicely fine-tuned.

Some experiences of Campaign for Better Transport member Andrew along Sandringham Road in recent weeks and months suggest that this is a route which has the opposite problem to the Outer Link: it has too many services at peak times and not enough during off-peak times. Here’s what Andrew sent me recently:

Peak loadings are very uneven. The early AM expresses I used usually have most seats taken, sometimes some standees. The later AM expresses are pretty well used.

The PM expresses are the emptiest, although I suspect it’s because they often depart the CBD just after, not before, all stopper services. Those who just get on the first available bus that comes along would therefore end up on the all-stopper, even if the express were the better bus for them.

Interpeak and evening services are often full standing, turning passengers away at some points as described in those tweets. Both the 233/243 and the 249 have this problem.

To explore this issue, I’ve compared service frequency patterns of Sandringham Road services with those along New North, Dominion and Mt Eden Roads. All four routes are generally similar, following key north-south arterials across the central part of the isthmus: (All the routes tend to split away south of Mt Albert Road and some have variations in their routes to what’s shown but this is a general guide).

If we look at the timetables for each of the four routes and measure the time each service either arrives (for inbound) or departs (for outbound) the city centre, we get an idea for the peak/off-peak split. The first graph below shows the varying frequencies for inbound services: Obviously for inbound services the big spike in frequencies is during the morning peak. In the 8:00-9:00am hour most of the routes have around a bus every three minutes, although Dominion Road has a significantly higher frequency than this – presumably to cope with the higher demand. Interestingly, Dominion Road maintains a far higher level of inter-peak service than any other route, but drops off in the evening peak whereas for all the other routes they get a bit of an increase (presumably because they’re sending so many buses into town to shift people out of town).

Looking at the PM peak, things are a bit different – with a more spread out peak in services from around 3:00-6:00pm: The precipitous drop-off in service frequency after 6pm on all four routes is quite surprising – and perhaps suggests that you might be most likely to find your bus completely full if you try to catch it between 6pm and 8pm. Not exactly ideal if we want to encourage more of a ‘spreading of the peak’ to enable the more efficient use of our bus resource.

Putting the inbound and outbound together and you get the full picture of how frequencies fluctuate throughout the day:  Some quite interesting observations can be made of the graph above. Firstly, it’s rather surprising that we have almost as many inter-peak buses on Dominion Road as we have evening peak buses. And with all routes we see that huge fall in service levels after 6pm.

If we look at the numbers of buses specifically, take the morning peak as buses arriving in town between 7am and 10am and the evening peak (as determined by bus numbers) as those leaving town between 3pm and 6pm, we can compare how “peaked” each of these routes are. There’s an interesting spread: While there’s not too much difference between New North Road and Sandringham Road services, we do find that Sandringham Road buses are the most “peaked” in terms of the service provision. This appears largely due to the poor inter-peak frequencies that both New North and Sandringham Road have – which more than make up for Dominion Road’s huge inbound peak numbers.

There doesn’t seem to me to be any particularly logical reason why Sandringham and New North should have much more “peaked” service provision than the other two routes although I know Dominion has particularly high demand so it perhaps justifies a higher inter-peak level of provision than the others. Perhaps it’s most surprising that New North Road has such a highly ‘peaked’ level of provision, as it duplicates the inner part of the Western Line and seems to be mostly used by university students (whose trips are likely to be spread throughout the day more).

It seems to me that if we were a bit smarter about service provision for both Sandringham and New North Road services we could perhaps knock a few peak time services away and use the significant money we save to spend on boosting inter-peak frequencies. For all routes it seems that a big boost in evening frequencies (6-9pm) is likely to be justified. With a bit of clever thinking, many of these changes could be made at little or no cost.

Share this

18 comments

  1. Off topic, but this is one of the reasons that the bus/bike lanes are way better along Sandringham, than Dominion.

  2. Wow. Buses do really drop off after 6pm.
    So people working late, or going to dinner after work are pretty much stuffed if they want to catch a bus home (or have to keep checking the time and the timetable).

    We all know PT works best with high frequencies and where you can just walk up at anytime and the bus isn’t far away. How many cars on the road during the morning peak are because the bus service in the evening isn’t very good?

    1. Yes, it seems the message from the council is to go home and stay home.

      Hardly something that facilitates an after work ‘world city’ vibrancy that will stop people draining overseas.

  3. If I understand correctly (and I only skimmed the post), you’re saying that they should move buses from the middle of the day to the evening. While this is an eminently sensible suggestion that would be easy to implement in the private sector, a public agency might be stymied by labor unions and their contract demands. This sort of flexible employment is very difficult with 8-hour workdays, which labor unions are very wedded to. I don’t know anything about transit unions in New Zealand, but in the US this is definitely the case, and leads to a lot of costly inefficiencies (such as bus and train operators sitting around with nothing to do during the middle of the day, or mechanics sitting around during rush hour not able to work on tracks or vehicles because they’re in service).

    1. I’m probably more looking at skimming a few “peak of the peak” services off a couple of the routes and shifting those resources into evening and inter-peak services. Having a less “peaked” service pattern could actually make it easier to operate with staffing as you wouldn’t need so many split shifts. You could have more people either doing morning and inter-peak or early afternoon and evening shifts.

      It generally seems like it’s possible to get buses when we need them. It was certainly managed during the Rugby World Cup.

  4. It’s often a challenge to catch a dominion road bus from k road between 6 and about 6:30pm- often 3 or 4 in a row pass without stopping. Looking at Mt Eden roads ones at that time though, I wouldn’t be surprised if they are worse. Mt Eden road buses seem to be pretty crowded most of the day though… Definately time for a frequency increase.

    I sometimes wonder why dominion road buses are so popular compared to most other routes in Auckland, and wonder if it is just the high frequency. The route is slow (narrow and incomplete bus lanes, combined with very heavy traffic), and an indirect route compared to the others mentioned here. They are also the slowest buses to reach balmoral road from the city in this comparison, and have an exceedingly complicated route structure (2 normal routes, a third which terminates early, and 3 different express types). The buses do terminate at the civic… Is this an advantage or a disadvantage? I know the walk up from uni is much further than for all other buses compared here.

    I also look at the demographics using dominion roads service and see that it’s quite different to other routes. For example we have far fewer businessmen in suits than on any other route I have caught,eg mt Eden road, tamaki, Great south road, and especially the 005 ( last time I caught that, it was standing room only, and I was the only under 30, as well as the only man without a tie…felt very out of place!)

    1. I think Dominion Road is somewhat a cycle of success with high frequencies encouraging more use, encouraging higher frequencies and so forth. Also, while its bus lanes aren’t perfect they are more extensive than most of the other routes – certainly better than the other three here.

      What would be interesting is working out for all four of these routes what proportion of trips start/end beyond Mt Albert Road and what proportion start/end on the city side of Mt Albert Road. I get the feeling lots of routes kind of “peter out” at their southern end, and we could perhaps have higher frequencies along the busier sections if we curtailed more services at Mt Albert Rd.

    1. I imagine the data is not released because it’s considered commercially sensitive. This is the great irony of the way we run our PT system: we can’t even be sure our rates are being spent sensibly on subsidies for bus companies, we’re just expected to keep feeding Infratil’s profit margins.

  5. Just to fill in a blank, “turning passengers away at some points as described in those tweets” were me tweeting to @AklTransport whenever I was on a bus that was so full it was turning passengers away, typically experienced on mid-morning (10am to midday) inbound buses (233 and 249) and evening (6-9pm) outbound buses (243 and 249).

    Sandringham Rd peak all-stopper services do get quite full, too.

  6. the evening peak is typically flatter and more spread than the AM, as many part timers will start work with everyone else then leave during the day, eg working mums might leave at 2-2:30 to get away to pick up kids, while other people may work to 6:00 or 6:30

    that said, there is a rush at around 5:10, which Stagecoach (that’s the era my info is from) used to timetable a lot of departures into (may have been a self fulfilling timetabling, “there’s a peak at 5:10, because that’s when all the buses go”)

  7. If you took the information for those graphs from official timetables, then I can tell you right now that the information is for at least one route an outright lie. Outbound buses along New North Road are 1-2 an hour between 7am and 8am. Typically, you get one bus slightly early (or very late, who knows?) and another haphazardly 30-45 minutes later. I know this from empirical experience.

    The timetable is a flat lie on that route, at least for me on the dozen occasions I tried to use the service (the last time in February this year) before I gave up on it as a reliable commuting option.

    it is good that you take the trouble to pour over timetables and spreadsheets; But if they don’t tally with the reality on the ground then you are just wasting your time.

  8. From observing my section of the Outer Link (Herne Bay – Ponsonby – CBD which seems to the bus that Admin uses), the problems in the morning are caused by the convergence of city commuters and the morning school run. I see students from Ponsonby Primary and especially St Mary’s College using the bus heavily, and I suspect upstream Bayfield Primary would get a lot of traffic as well. That congestion doesn’t seem to happen in the evening where the after-school run is over before the evening commute begins.

    That particular problem could be eased by increasing the frequency of the peak hours only 005 in the mornings from say, every 15 minutes to every 10 minutes. (I can’t comment on other parts of the Outer Link route).

    The big advantage of the Outer Link change for me has been the increased off-peak frequency, and I’ve used the bus to get downtown on weekeends when I might have otherwise taken the car.

  9. Looking at the timetable and route maps the Outer Link has other services that overlay the 15 min frequency in peak on the 2 main sections of the route i.e. Pt Chev/Westmere inwards has 7 x 005 services which slot in between each Outer Link giving a 7.5min frequency. On the other side from Newmarket into the City you have the Inner Link and Remuera Rd services coming through into the CBD (but not the Uni). This gives a pretty strong frquency fro the Parnell leg of the trips.

    One question on the Dominion Rd, Sandringham Rd frequency comparisons. You have said it is the number of buses – is this correct, or do you mean the number of trips. If it is the number of trips this might explain why Dominion Rd interpeak service looks similar to the P.M. peak service. Running time during middle of the day means that the buses can do loads of trips with the 5 min frequency (lowish actual bus number required), whereas in the P.M. peak the running time is maybe 50%+ longer meaning more buses have to be plugged into the system. Definitely agree that it seems odd that the number of trips is the same. The big drop off after 6pm is a major concern given that some of the loads coming out of the city are very large up to 7pm. I would have thought the p.m. peak is 4-7pm for PT rather than 4-6?

    1. They are number of trips taken from the timetables. Longer running time during peak further explains why those services cost heaps to put on, and how we could benefit from removing a few of them and boosting early evening frequencies.

  10. On the 020 route there are quite bad problems with overcrowding and if the proposed changes take place then I predict it would get worse with passengers crowding to try and get on the 020X buses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *