One extremely annoying thing about the new “Auckland Transport” is that they have discontinued ARTA’s tradition of publishing a breakdown of monthly public transport patronage data. While at some level this is could be seen as merely an annoyance for public transport nerds like myself, I think there’s a bigger “public relations” reason why we need more patronage data more frequently – and that is we need to sell the success of public transport to both the public and also (perhaps more particularly) to skeptical central government politicians.

It may sound sensible to spend lots of money on roads and hardly any on public transport when you’re spouting numbers like “there are over 3 million car trips a day in Auckland and less than 200,000 public transport trips”; it sounds a whole heap less sensible to have such lop-sided transport policies if you can say “over the past two years traffic numbers haven’t increased in Auckland, while public transport patronage has been increasing by nearly 10% a year over the same time period”. After all, we plan and build new transport infrastructure for the future, not the past – and nobody’s proposing to tear up any roads (except perhaps the Lower Hobson Street viaduct) any time soon.

In order to have good arguments, and Auckland Transport desperately needs to work with Auckland Council to make the argument for public transport, we need the data. NZTA are excellent at providing monthly information on traffic volume trends along state highways (although their assumption that traffic volumes are continually growing is a bit of a lie). Frustrated by Auckland Transport’s inability to make public any PT data since they were formed last year, regular commenter Luke sent in an official information request, with the request also seeking information right back to 2002. The file he received from Auckland Transport can be viewed here. To make it a bit easier to understand, CBT forum member “Scott” has put the data into a graph:

The particularly interesting months to look at are those from October 2010 onwards, because we’ve never seen this data before. They show a great recovery in October from the October 2009 bus lockout, then a particularly excellent result in November 2009 before smaller increases in December and January. It’s good to see that January managed a slight increase from the year before, even though pretty much the whole railway network was closed for most of that month. Patronage in the 12 months to January 2011 was 63.6 million, up 8% on the same previous 12 months. October was up by 21% (recovery from the previous year’s lockout) but most spectacularly November patronage was up by 15% on the year before. December also enjoyed a 6% increase.

What’s frustrating about all this good news is how difficult it has been to get this information out of Auckland Transport. We shouldn’t have to be doing official information requests to find all this out – Auckland Transport should be trumpeting it as a huge success, particularly the November results. I’m sure that Len Brown would have appreciated the opportunity to say, in December when there was a huge debate going on about the CBD Rail Tunnel, that PT patronage had gone up by 15% the previous month compared to the same month last year.  If I were him, or any other Auckland Council member – trying to argue the case for better PT – I’d be damn right annoyed with Auckland Transport that they’ve been so secretive with this information.

Update:

Auckland Transport clearly keep a reasonably close eye on this blog, as merely an hour or so after this post went up I’ve received so more detailed patronage information from them for January 2011:

For the 12 months to 31 January
Total public transport patronage 63,592,200
Bus – 49,807,116
Rail – 9,095,731
Ferry – 4,609,353

For the month of January 2011 (comparisons to Jan 2010)
Total patronage 3,905,984, up 33,025 boardings (0.9%) for the month
RTN total patronage 579,052, up 2296 boardings (0.4%) for the month
· Northern Express 116,417, up 12,935 boardings (12.5%) for the month
· Rail western line 170,601, up 42,371 boardings (33%) for the month
· Rail Southern and Eastern Line 292,034 (includes Onehunga patronage of 35,927) down 53,010 (-15.4%) for the month.

QTN and LCN patronage 2,869,661 (excludes ferry and school bus), up 34,357 (1.2%) for the month

Ferry patronage 457,220 (down 3679 boarding (0.8%) for the month

I’ll be doing my best to get similar data out of them for October to December last year.

Share this

20 comments

  1. Auckland Transport probably has no idea that ARTA used to do this. You have to remember that 1500 staff were shed in the course of the transition and the staff who remained often ended up doing different jobs. Many basic functions were literally left out of the new structure and became nobody’s responsibility. As to more long-term question of why patronage should be increasing so strongly, see this very interesting piece of research commissioned by the Victorian state government, called “Explaining the Surge” : http://natureresearch.com.au/ptrp.html . It’s in a Victorian context but the arguments probably apply to Auckland as well (same phenomenon’s been observed all over the place).

    1. Thanks for the link Chris, very good…. the short answer is that there has been, and is, a shift in the culture. We know this intuitively but it is good to see some analysis too: PT has lost its déclassé quality. Now to only get the Powers-that-be to see that too and behave like a democracy should and respond with investment.

  2. PS I should add 1500 staff shed in the whole Auckland Council transition, not purely in transport of course.

  3. Another thing to note is that the SOI sets out AT’s goals for this year an for PT that is to achieve 62.8m trips so they are already well ahead of that figure (also note that last year to June Patronage was 60m). Marchs results will be intersting as the buses and trains seem to be bursting at the seams right now.

  4. There are definately a lot more people on buses than a year ago. I catch Dominion Road services daily, and despite there being a bus about every 3-4 mins, I have found myself watching 3 or 4 go past completely packed without stopping every time I have tried to go home between 5:30-6:30 this month. Even on Sunday’s, with a bus every 20 mins I often don’t get a seat now. Have noticed the same recently on various other buses Auckland wide this year. I know march is meant to be the busiest month, but I Havnt seen it like this before. AT really need to start improving capacity very quickly if they don’t want this to be undone.

  5. Josh, you will be pleased to know that a specific team has been set up to look at transport/landuse integration in the new Auckland Transport Structure. And obviously a big part of that teams role is promoting PT and PT oriented development.

  6. But what about the bad news? I sent the following feedback to Veolia today:

    The ‘breakdown’ of a train departing north-bound prior to my usual service (all-stops 07:30 Papakura to Britomart) led to a 07:27 PA announcement at Papakura Station that all north-bound services from Papakura were to be forthwith cancelled for ‘..at least half an hour…’. This left me with no alternative but to go back to my car and drive to the city centre. Ultimately, this added an additional hour to my journey TO my office in the morning, AND ADDITONALLY a further 90 minutes to my return journey in the afternoon (because presumably so many other rail commuters had been similarly affected). This is not acceptable VEOLIA. Get your act together – or go back to where you came from and let someone who knows how to run a train service take over.

  7. Perhaps they are also just still sorting themselves out? Big transitions take time and they may have fewer staff (comparatively) than when they started working on passenger transport…

    Personally I reckon it would be awesome if they monitored cycling numbers and walking numbers more often. But I accept it’s hard to becaus eyou have to physically count them…

  8. i have also often reflected that these reports must take somebody quite some time to produce. maybe they could just do quarterly ones instead? I think that wd be enough.

    1. Lucy I know for a fact that Auckland Transport has had internal patronage information (to a far greater level of detail than what has ever been publicly released) every month since it was formed. They have to, in order to manage the contracts properly.

      They’ve just never been bothered to release anything publicly. No real excuse except incompetence.

  9. It would be quite cool if they can somehow expand those cycle detectors at Tamaki Dr to be able to also count cyclists.

    As for walkers, only a physical count can work, or the census, although the census information is about as useful as a (seeing I can use my usual lines for this as this site is ‘serious’) something not particularly useful.

  10. Why the decrease on the southern line? That’s massive, especially considering the new Onehunga line.

    I think PT still has a declasse sensibility in the South, and reliability has a lot to do with it.

    1. The Eastern line and Southern Line south of Penrose were closed for 3 weeks this year instead of the 2 weeks it was last year while the Western line was only closed for 2 weeks this year compared to 3 last year. I don’t think we will be able to rely on January figures for quite some time to come as that is when a huge chunk of upgrade and maintenance work is done.

    1. There was a Herald article a few weeks back saying that Onehunga station is getting around 800 passengers a day compared to the estimate of 500. Those numbers must come from October or November I reckon. We may be over 1000 a day by now.

    2. What’s really impressive about it is that the Onehunga services are run on the nastiest, noisiest, smelliest trains in the fleet. If I were working on them, I’d be expecting hearing protection. If I’m catching the train home I’ll often prefer a Papakura or Pukekohe service just so that I don’t have to put up with the deafening roar associated with the Onehunga service.
      So if growth is this phenomenal when the mode is so crap, how much more impressive will it be when we’ve got our nice, quiet EMUs going all over the place?

      Also, is it just me or have trains got much busier in the last few weeks? I got a free ride home on Wednesday because the train was so packed that the train manager just didn’t even try to clip tickets. That’s a good sign, but bad for revenue and for passenger counts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *