In my opinion, perhaps the most important factor determining how a particular part of the city will feel are the road widths. The wider the road is, generally the faster people will be encouraged to drive – the opposite is obviously true too. Now clearly in some areas we want wide roads – for example, I bet most people wish Dominion Road was a bit wider so we could fit a lane of traffic, a high quality bus lane, a cycle lane and keep on-street parking. We also spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year in Auckland widening motorways (Manukau Harbour Crossing, Victoria Park Tunnel & Newmarket Viaduct projects are all effectively motorway widening projects) – although the merits of that spend are probably highly debatable in many situations. But is the engineer’s mantra of “wider is better” actually true? I would argue that in most cases the opposite is true – particularly for residential streets and for streets in town centres.
It is interesting driving around Auckland and seeing the relationship between street width and the character of the area. Auckland’s narrowest little streets generally seem to be in places like Ponsonby and Freeman’s Bay – and they contribute enormously to the character of those areas, along with the heritage housing of course. Would John Street be anything like it is if you could zip along there at close to 60 kph? I tend to think not.
Some of the newer developments in Auckland seem to finally be understanding the importance of narrow streets: to generate character and to slow vehicles down. In the Stonefields development, a brownfields redevelopment of the old Mt Wellington quarry, the road-widths have tended to be limited to a greater extent than I’ve seen in most other new subdivisions. The photo below shows that to some extent, although it’s a bit difficult to analyse the widths because there are no parked cars to compare to:
Another thing to note is the intersections don’t have massively wide arcs allowing cars to turn corners at high speeds. In fact, cars need to slow right down to turn a corner – gosh that must annoy the traffic engineers!
Unfortunately, such enlightened thinking as we’re seeing at Stonefields has not migrated further south to developments happening around Flat Bush, or indeed to the heart of Manukau City which is still dissected by a massive 70 kph arterial route (despite the fact that there’s hardly any traffic on it because that has been diverted onto the new motorway).
Starting with Flat Bush, there is supposed to be a new town centre being built over the next few years to complement the growing residential area. On the plans, the town centre looks pretty good: it’s close to the massive Barry Curtis Park, it has an obvious main street – and so on, and so forth:
So Ormiston Road is going to be the main street, passing through the town centre. Should be quite nice one would think – a kind of new version of old town centres perhaps?
Clearly, nobody told the traffic engineers:
Oh great, we have a defacto motorway as the future main street of Flat Bush, with a stupid pointless “kink” in it just to completely ruin our urban design principles. I can totally see cafes and retail shops establishing along here in the future to create a sense of town centre vibrancy. NOT. I can see another Albany megacentre urban design failure in the making.
Finally, turning to the heart of Manukau City – which had been sliced in half for so long by Wiri Station Road – I had some hope for the future of this area once the SH20-SH1 connection was completed. Getting all those vehicles off Wiri Station Road (now called Manukau Station Road, by the way) offered a superb opportunity to slow the road down, narrow it, create a lot more pedestrian connections and tie together two sides of the town centre. So how have things gone?
So we haven’t slowed things down at all yet, and the empty road hasn’t been narrowed yet.
There’s a shopping mall on one side of this road and a theme park on the other – but what are the chances of a pedestrian actually trying to get across this road? Next to zilch I would think. What an epic failure, what a missed opportunity.
If there is a lesson to be learned from these observations, it is that we really need to be smarter in the way we align our transport and land-use policies. The main streets through our town centres cannot be four-lane superhighways. If we want people to drive slowly, if we want to encourage pedestrian activity, if we want to have streetside retail activity, then we need to keep those roads narrow. We need to slow the cars down, we need to prioritise the pedestrians, we need to give these places some character.
Seriously, we need to do better than this.
Processing...
Couldn’t agree more. I think about my old neighborhood at greenwoods corner and how much nicer that could be if there weren’t so many cars zooming through it. And by Auckland standards that’s a good little town centre.
The first photo of Stonefields is interesting and is very much like my area which is not surprising considering both are Fletcher developments. They obviously get it when it comes to designing neighborhoods that feel cohesive and friendly. There are lots of little touches that tie the development together like the neat light poles, I actually find it quite interesting comparing it to areas where the sections are sold off and people are left to design and develop their own houses.
Yeah, there will have to be an awful amount of retro-fitting and road-dieting to be done in the future.
I try to see it the positive way. At least once we realise we NEED more cycleways and tram lines and wider footpaths and trees in our roads, we have some space there for them. It would be better if they got it right from the start, but at least one CAN fix the issue to too-wide roads. Cheaply so, in fact.
Interesting comments on the road engineer’s mindset at http://www.grist.org/article/2010-11-22-confessions-of-a-recovering-engineer
Found on Jarrett Walker’s Human Transait blog
Thanks for the link John, I’ve often felt talking to some traffic engineers and big road boosters is like talking to people from another planet, so counter intuitive and obsessed with the free movement of machines above all else…. nice to have it spelt out so rationally, I guess it takes an engineer to do that!
I thought the plan was to turn one lane on Manukau Station road into carparking? Why hasn’t this happened…
However, if you look at the new section of this road that has recently been built
http://maps.google.ch/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=de&q=Wiri+Station+Rd,+Manukau+2104,+Auckland,+Neuseeland&sll=-36.909,174.876696&sspn=0.651156,0.928345&ie=UTF8&oi=georefine&cd=3&geocode=FeFsy_0dZFFsCg&split=0&hq=&hnear=Wiri+Station+Rd,+Manukau+2104,+Auckland,+Neuseeland&ll=-36.995955,174.878169&spn=0.00127,0.001813&t=k&z=19
You can see it continues to be 2 lanes which suggests they have no intention to change this street. Talk about a lost opportunity.
Actually, if you look at the bridge on that picture, or go down the road (I’ve travelled on it a couple of times), you can see the four lanes have really been squeezed in, and that’s a brand new bridge. That implies to me that those lanes will be going and I’d expect footpaths to replace them.
Admittedly it’s slightly narrower at ~11.5 metres for 4 lanes c.f. 12.5 metres elsewhere, but that seems more like a cost cutting exercise than anything. In many places in the CMJ 4-lanes of traffic also only take up 12 or so metres.
Totally agree that the widths of roads affect the neighbourhood feel. I do have a concern that the current push to promote on road parking away from on site parking requirements conflicts with narrowing the road widths. I would rather have narrower roads.
Goose – on-raod parking is fine – IF it is regularly interrupted by trees or other kerb extensions. That way, even if the on-street parking is empty at night or some other off-peak time, the road won’t feel like a drag strip.
On street parking does a good job of narrowing streets down, which contributes nicely to slower speeds.
I do not think you can compare Stonefields with Flatbush, Ormiston Road is required to be this width. If I want to get from say Botany Junction to Whitford, then I do not want to fight my way through narrow roads and other traffic. So we either need thoroughfares or railway lines…
Hi GJA,
I think that’s the important point – we do need dedicated through routes, where the focus is on getting people from A – B. That can then mean other roads, town centres e.g. can be designed for people, rather than traffic.
If you look at the residential streets in Flatbush, you will note some of these have onstreet parking and then there is barely enough space to pass the parked cars.
I agree there is a lack of planning and both us and our children will suffer…
The problem in Flatbush is the dedicated through route goes right through the town centre!
Isn’t this a case of the lack of landuse and transport planning that has dogged Auckland for so long. One of the biggest problemf or Auckland is that all of our traditional shopping centres are also on the arterial roads for through traffic. There is an obvious conflict there and no cheap solutions. Look at the Dominion Road issue, the traffic engineers were looking at by passing shopping centres weren’t they, but it all got too hard.
It got too hard for Banks and co. They uplifted existing bypass designations, which in retrospect is a real crime.
Reading this here suggests that there are plans to reduce Wiri Station Rd, at least the part in Manukau City, does give hope.
http://www.boffamiskell.co.nz/projects/mcc-public-domain-manual.php