Tomorrow ARTA will launch the next step in improving Auckland’s bus system – their “b.line” project. I first got wind of this concept a few months back, and I did a hopeful post that it seemed as though we were starting to see the rollout of the “Quality Transit Network” that ARTA have been promising for many years now, but haven’t got around to actually implementing. Here’s the media release:

b.line tackles public transport disbelievers

The Auckland Regional Transport Authority (ARTA) and bus operator, NZ Bus, with the support of Auckland City Council’s Transport Committee, will officially launch b.line tomorrow. b.line is the first visually identifiable, simple to use, high frequency bus service for Dominion and Mt Eden Roads. The b.line service includes b.line branded buses, bus flags and bus stops. b.line buses are scheduled to run a minimum of every fifteen minutes from 7am to 7pm every week day. Over time, additional, high frequency b.line services will be implemented throughout the region.

ARTA’s General Manager Customer Services, Mark Lambert said, “While public transport in Auckland has achieved very good growth during the past five years we are now focused on public transport making an even greater contribution to moving people around Auckland. This requires a step change in public transport planning and performance by ARTA as outlined in the recently released Auckland Regional Passenger Transport Plan 2010 (RPTP).

“A huge potential target market for public transport exists in Auckland. For many people their perception of public transport is based on an experience from years ago. Although there is still work to be done, a great deal has happened in respect of service levels and infrastructure development during that time which many Aucklanders simply aren’t aware of.

“High frequency bus corridors represent a good starting point for us in our drive to encourage even more people back to public transport. ARTA has identified twenty plus such corridors in the region which will over time and working with our bus operators in the region, be developed to meet the fifteen minutes or less frequency and branded b.line services”.

Mr Lambert said, “Research on bus travel conducted in late 2009 by Colmar Brunton using 504 respondents, both public transport and non public transport users, showed there were a set of key indicators when making a choice, or not, to use public transport.

“In order to make public transport a viable choice, respondents wanted to be able to clearly identify the bus stops, shelters and timetables of high frequency bus services. They also wanted high frequency services to run a minimum of every fifteen minutes and to have real time bus arrival information which we are delivering via web, text messaging and, where available a real time sign at bus stops. Respondents also wanted a percentage of the route to be a bus priority lane at peak times. Simplification of bus routes was also key as many people found the system overly complex.

“Following on from the Colmar Brunton research, ARTA developed the b.line concept working with NZ Bus and tested the concept with a panel of Aucklanders. Fifty nine per cent of respondents said if we satisfied the indicators identified in the research they were likely to increase their public transport usage. Sixty two per cent found the images we proposed using, cheerful, fresh, lively, friendly and fun, making using the service much more appealing.

“While fifteen minute or less service frequency already exists on Dominion and Mt Eden Roads and patronage is very good at peak times, we want to up the ante and encourage those who haven’t considered using public transport before and who might well use services outside of peak times, such as students and families, to realise that, increasingly, public transport is a very viable alternative to car use.

Chief Executive of NZ Bus, Bruce Emson said, “b.line represents a significant step forward for our customers who tell us that one of the biggest barriers to catching a bus in Auckland is the complexity of the public transport system. b.line simplifies the experience and we are confident that Aucklanders will embrace it and our investment in new buses on the b. line, which are now on the road.”

First-off, I think it’s kind of odd to head up the project’s aim as being effectively “to convert nonbelievers” in public transport. Does that mean I’m some crazy public transport religious whack-job believer?

But anyway, turning to the concept itself, I like the idea of identifying in some way “superior” bus routes in Auckland, where there’s some sort of guarantee you’re going to get a good service. I think people are often put off public transport because there’s this fear (generally quite reasonably founded) that you’re going to end up stranded at the stop forever because you’ve just missed the bus and you have no idea when the next one’s coming. B.line seeks to counter this by making it extremely simple: if you see all the designs and logos then you know that you’re on a b.line route and there’s a reasonably good service. That’s a good step in the right direction.

This is the kind of stuff we’re likely to see at b.line stops (I should get out there myself soon and check it out):
And some posters:

The very strange thing about this is that “every 15 minutes or less” statement. The reason this is odd is that currently Dominion Road buses operate every 5 minutes or less, while Mt Eden Road buses operate every 10 minutes or less throughout the “Monday to Friday, 7am-7pm” window that this is advertising. Now I’m not a marketing expert, but surely the first rule of marketing is: “if you have a good product, don’t say it’s a mediocre product to try to sell it”. A bus every 5 minutes (Dominion Road) is a very good product, at least when it comes to public transport in Auckland. Sure, the bus lanes could be a bit longer in terms of their extent and their operating hours – but it’s pretty damn good. The same goes for Mt Eden Road, although to a slightly lesser extent, as the frequencies are every 10 minutes. But still, the service is pretty damn good, and better than what seems to be advertised here.

As I noted in my comment on Jeremy’s post, it’s like advertising some no-name band when actually it’s a U2 concert. Pretty damn odd. The only reason I can comprehend this “under-sell” of implementing b.line for Mt Eden and Dominion Roads is that ARTA hopes to extend the concept to other QTNs in the future – but doesn’t want to commit itself to anything better than 15 minute frequencies on those routes. Which is actually quite disappointing really, as in my mind a bus every 15 minutes (and potentially not even that outside Monday-Friday 7am-7pm) doesn’t really constitute what a QTN should be. I would have thought a minimum 10 minute standard would make a lot more sense.

But anyway, in terms of what I think of the concept as a whole, as I noted above I think it’s a good idea to make a distinction between QTN services and “other” services. Providing some sort of guarantee with the b.line that you’re going to get “the best PT Auckland can offer” makes good sense. However, I do hope that the reality can match the hype. The Dominion Road bus lanes are under attack by Auckland City Council, the Mt Eden Road bus lanes are incredibly patchy, and in some areas only apply between 4.30pm and 5.30pm in the evenings.

I suppose looking from an optimistic angle, identifying various routes as “b.lines” will hopefully give some extra impetus to improve the bus lanes along it, to give buses better priority at traffic lights, to take steps to provide faster boarding times through “off-vehicle” ticketing as busy stations and any other steps that will help the buses run along the corridors faster. If this happens then b.line will actually mean something – it will actually be a higher quality form of public transport. If it doesn’t, then I fear the whole b.line idea will be “all sizzle, no sausage”.

Share this

19 comments

  1. Another optimistic angle: Thank goodness it isn’t the 80s or 90s and we have initiatives like this to critique..!

  2. I wonder if they are trying to use the under promise over deliver strategy. It is enivitible that if they were to say a bus every 10 mins then as soon as a bus was late by being held up by traffic/slow boarding etc then someone will complain and as is typical of Auckland it would make the news and hurt patronage

    Hopefully it does work and can help to justify further infrastructure improvements although I do worry that rate payees are paying to increase the profits of NZ Bus. The solutions to that would be to only roll out the b line brand to routes that are gross contracted

  3. I don’t think NZBus actually *does* make all that much in the way of profit on its operations. If you go through the Infratil Annual Report, the post-tax and post-interest profitability for this business isn’t that strong – and remember that in the last few years NZBus have fronted up with $100m of investment (the new buses cost over $400,000/vehicle). Unlike airports, urban passenger operations are not an especially strong investment option. That is why Stagecoach sold up in the first place, because they weren’t really making all that much free cash.

  4. “Does that mean I’m some crazy public transport religious whack-job believer?” – According to the likes of John Roughan, Owen McShane and Liberty Scott – yes.

  5. The next step should be to get and promote 15 minute or better frequencies between 7am and 7pm, 7 days a week.

    Because if you still need one car per person to travel on weekends, chances are you’ll get one car per person and use them weekdays too.

    One thing I’ve noticed … the posters fail to mention that there are any services outside the promoted 7am-7pm Mon-Fri times.

  6. Slightly off topic, but as someone who supports public transport I had a pretty cool conversation with one of my co-workers.

    I quote:

    “I used to hate getting the bus so much that I’d often get a cab to work instead of the bus – it used to sometimes take an hour from View Rd into the city. Now with all those bus lanes its dead easy”

    Also one of the other girls at work was saying about how awesome the Northern Busway is, along the same lines. She parks at the Park and ride at Albany and it only takes her 20mins to get into the city each morning. Apparently lives somewhere up that way and leaves home at 7:45 and is at work by 20 past 8.

  7. Andrew, I agree that one could interpret the signs in a way that makes you wondee whether there is any service outside those hours.

    The Trickster, that’s good stuff to hear, but the change of heart wasn’t from some fancy-pants marketing campaign, it was from real improvements to bus priority.

  8. Are these a true “express/limited stop services” or simply a rebranding of parts of the network where high frequency exists due to the overlap of routes?

    Vancouver’s B lines work because they only stop every half dozen or so regular stops, at points of high passenger concentration.

    The fact they are saying “all bus services along Dominion Rd and Mt Eden Rd starting with 25, 26 or 27.” tends to make me think that they are not speeding up the service by spacing out the stops. But I hope that I am wrong

  9. Every 15 minutes! That’s NOT GOOD ENOUGH. It’s definitely not enough to convert ‘non-believers’. Those simple three words will completely undermine the whole project. They’d be muich better off not mentioning the frequency at all.

  10. Ian, the crazy thing is that the buses aren’t every 15 minutes, they’re every 5 (Dom Rd) or 10 (Mt Eden Rd) minutes. Goodness knows why ARTA want to say the product is worse than what the reality is.

  11. As I live on the Dominion Road bus route and have been following the Council’s efforts to destroy our bus lanes, I assumed that the “every 15 minutes” announcement was a way to sell the fact the buses will not be running as often as they used to. Are they planning to increase bus frequency when the bus lanes become t2 or will the schedule change?

  12. Having not used my usual bus (Mt Eden Road) for several weeks – cycling every day instead – I found myself rather baffled by this rebranding exercise when I took the bus last nite. Not only is the service under-sold, but the strategy of naming two routes with a name which implies a specific route is just confusing. In other cities the phrase B-line would imply a particular route, not the quality of the service. I question whether the re-branding element is just a waste of money. Good blunt advertising around the regularity of the service would probably be more effective. I’m not sure people want to associate with the rather irrelevant Bee graphics, just the quality of the service.

    As a final note, does this branding not confuse the public further in relation to RTN / QTN jargon? Where is the coherent strategy between our PT? Is this just a precursor to Supercity approaches?

  13. Interesting insight Tim. ARTA regularly read this blog so I’m sure they’ll find your feedback useful.

    I have had some interesting discussions with ARTA on this “underselling” issue, and it seems as though they will roll out b.line to a lot more routes in the future – and then it will make a bit more sense. I hope that the next b.line route ARTA goes for is a cross-town route, in other words a situation where meeting the 15 minute guarantee will result in an improvement to the current situation: rather than actually be worse than what we have now.

  14. Relabelling is a nice effort, but I think other steps would be much more necessary to increase patronage:
    – publish network maps (and display at every station)showing the true location of all stations so that people can responsibly create their trip – esp. if they have to use more than 1 carrier.
    – install a ticketing system for greater Auckland (the Supercity?)that makes changing of busses/trains/ferries easy within a trip just by paying for stages or zones
    – harmonize time tables for ease of interconnectivity – I know this is a huge task but managable (even if it should require to run the system by a city-owned company to provide the best service, and have the predefined lines leased out to the private operators.
    – provide a reasonable frequency outside the rush-hours as well – even if not as profitable then – so that patrons perceive the PT as a reliable means of transport (you wouldn’t give away your good car if you then have to rely on an old car that works only at limited times – would you?) – other cities have night lines and the trains run frequent on weekends as well.

    I am aware all this doesn’t come over night but it is more effective than just adding a nice b(ee)-logo. If you want to know more about a really first class PT system in a city of the similar size then have a look at what Munich created back in the late 60’s which is still running strong:
    http://www.mvv-muenchen.de/en/home/index.html (all in English as well)
    By the way: there is no Autobahn going through the middle of the Munich but a thick network of trains, subways, trams and busses and the “Queen Street” is one of the liveliest pedestrian precincts…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *