A couple of my posts in recent days have illustrated my frustration, and to an extent outright anger, at possible changes to the Northern Busway and the Dominion Road bus lanes. Changes that would erode the “bus priority” that currently exists on both those routes. The level of frustration and anger that I feel about these two changes actually surprised me to some extent, but when I think about it in a bit more detail perhaps it’s not so surprising after all. And that’s because bus lanes (or bus prioritisation in general) are utterly critical to improving our public transport – for many reasons, but generally those which cut to the core of making public transport more into something that people will want to use. In short, they make public transport faster, more convenient, more reliable and for the operator – more cost effective.

To get a bit more off my chest before I move onto explaining in a bit more detail why bus lanes are so critical, I think what really annoys me about the possible Northern Busway and Dominion Road changes is the hypocrisy of it. Both Auckland City Council and NZTA go on about the need to “improve public transport” in airy-fairy documents and statements (particularly Auckland City Mayor John Banks who sells himself as a ‘born again public transport supporter’), and yet we see both these organisations doing pretty much the worst thing possible for public transport, by taking away the very priority measures that have made these two routes probably the two most successful and popular bus routes in Auckland. It is decisions like these by which we should judge NZTA and (perhaps more particularly) Auckland City Council’s opinion towards public transport – not the grand statements of support for projects like the CBD rail tunnel.

So why is it so utterly critical that we don’t lose the Dominion Road bus lanes, and why we can’t allow HOVs to clog up the Northern Busway? Ultimately, it is because these changes would cut to the heart of the very steps that make these two routes unusually successful and popular in Auckland. As I have explained before, people are logical in their transport decisions: they will choose the option that is fastest, most affordable, most convenient and (I haven’t said it before but I think it’s also extremely important) most reliable. Bus lanes/priority helps all four of those aspects, which is somewhat unusual when it comes to public transport improvements, especially when it can be done so cheaply!

  • Makes buses faster: This is perhaps the most obvious benefit of bus lanes, as they are able to bypass traffic congestion and provides the potential for buses to pass the same route faster than someone can drive it. This compares to a bus in general traffic which, almost by definition, cannot possibly be faster than someone driving the same route – because the bus has to stop and pick up passengers. If we are to get more people using public transport (which we do because of its social, economic and environmental benefits) then we have to ensure that it’s a logical choice for them: and a huge part of that is making it faster (or at worst, not hugely slower) than driving.
  • Improves affordability: Because bus lanes allow buses to travel faster from point A to point B than would be the case if they were stuck in traffic, the resource dedicated to operating that service can be used more efficiently. If you are to operate a service at 10 minute frequencies, for example, the faster you can get your buses from end to end along that route, the fewer buses and drivers you need in order to make it work. One thing that I’m not quite sure ARTA has yet appreciated is that if the buses they run along Dominion Road and the Northern Busway are slowed down considerably by the introduction of other vehicles into the bus lanes, then they will either need to use more vehicles and drivers to maintain the current timetables, or they’ll have to cut back on frequencies. As we end up paying for the provision of public transport, through fares, rates or NZTA funds – the more efficiently the services can run the more affordable they are for all people: road users included. So bus lanes improve public transport affordability.
  • Improves convenience: One of the critical aspects of public transport being convenient is frequency. How long you have to wait between buses plays a huge factor in the “ease of use” of the system. Nobody likes waiting around for a bus for very long, and having bus lanes should lead to better frequencies being possible with the same resource (because speeds are higher). Bus lanes are also very useful “guides” in telling people where bus routes are, and also generally are an indicator that the route is going to be a “fairly decent one”, because otherwise why would there be bus lanes.
  • Improved reliability: I was talking to someone “in the know” the other day and they mentioned to me that the Northern Busway is far and away the most reliable bus route in Auckland, in the measure of how frequently it arrives when it should. Reliability is important because fundamentally people need to know when they’re going to get where they’re going. If you need to be at work by 9am, then you’re not going to use a transportation mode that has a 50% chance of getting you there by 9am, or even one that has an 80% chance of doing so. You’re going to use something that will get you there on time 90% or more of the time, which means that you’re either going to avoid using an unreliable service or you’re going to build in a “buffer” to your travel time, which in ‘transport economics world’ should be added to travel time. The more reliable the service, the less buffer time that’s needed, and the more attractive it is – hence the wild success of the Northern Busway.

Sticking with reliability for a minute, theoretically public transport within its own right of way has the ability to provide a level of travel time reliability that simply cannot be matched in a car. Vehicle congestion varies tremendously, according to the weather, if it’s school holidays, if there was an accident three hours ago, or even just randomly for no reason at all. Public transport, with its own right of way (whether in the form of a railway line, a busway or even just a bus lane) shouldn’t have that variability (theoretically at least). For example, there’s no real reason why our trains shouldn’t run on time to the second (Japan manages it), but even thinking about running cars on-time to the second is absurd – or buses in general traffic is even more absurd.

In the end, providing bus lanes benefits the core reasons why people are likely to choose public transport over driving: in that the bus becomes faster, more convenient, more reliable and (in the longer run) potentially more affordable. Ruining bus lanes destroys all those benefits, and is probably the most effective way of reducing public transport patronage one could think of. And as the economic benefits of attracting every new public transport passenger are very significant (and therefore the economic costs of losing patronage are also significant), the implications of ruining the Northern Busway and the Dominion Road bus lanes might be immense.

    Share this

    17 comments

    1. This is splitting hairs a little, but ‘making buses faster’ isn’t actually the benefit of bus lanes if you think about it. It’s actually ‘allowing buses to travel at their normal speed’, by not subjecting them to traffic congestion caused primarily by single occupant car drivers.
      The point being that bus travel can actually be inherently quick. Certainly there are a some bus related issues that slow the services down and those need to be addressed, but it is non-bus traffic congestion that is the biggest cause of delay on peak routes.

    2. You could actually combine the making buses faster with the added convenience or reliability.

      I have a colleague that uses the busway daily. One interesting thing is he knows the frequencies are high enough that he won’t be waiting for more than a few mins and if a bus is semi full he knows a bus with more room will be just behind it. What often determines his traveling though is the carpark at Albany as he knows that if he isn’t there by a certain time then he won’t get a park. He does sometimes catch a feeder bus from near his home in Greenhithe but it isn’t very frequent, not always on time and fare structure is different depending on which bus turns up.

    3. Well said, admin. So depressing to see it all turn to custard so quickly. We HAVE to take politicians to account on these crazy decisions. I mean which city in the world actually proposes to REDUCE public transport while growing like hell? Auckland. It is so stupid, as if politicians have been sniffing exhaust fumes for too many decades.

    4. I actually think that the Northern Busway is probably considerably more reliable than SH1 through the North Shore which may be part of the secret of it’s success – it’s more reliable than driving! I remember that at my old work place people would frequently turn up 20 minutes late due to unexpectedly heavy traffic on the North Shore coming into town.

    5. But the problem is… buses don’t take me exactly WHERE i want to go, WHEN i want to go. and WHAT if I have a detour i want to make? And I don’t want to be WAITING for buses for the rest of my life! And have you seen the shocking, pathetic lack of parking at the park and rides? It should be called “Park & Walk” …I caught the busway from The North Shore to britomart and transferred to the airport bus out to auckland airport. And it cost $41 return! And it took an hour and a half!!!!! If i was with a second person it would have been cheaper, faster, and better for the environment to catch a taxi rather than a huge bus using lots of diesel that nobody’s using!! That was my worst experience with public transport EVER. And hello, where am i supposed to but my luggage??? Answer: nowhere. Put it in the way of all the other poor fools using pubic [sic] transport.

      Did you people ever stop to think that buses use lots of fuel even when nobody’s riding on them!!!??? If 1000 people don’t drive their car one day, there would be 1000 cars worth of pollution not going into the environment. But if 1000 people don’t catch the bus one day, the buses still pollute the environment! Buses are terrible! And who cares about the environment ANYWAY!??? Have you people HEARD of CHINA???? Don’t you know about their pollution? Hello, little old nz isn’t ever going to make a difference on the global scale! You fools!

      But I have the solution – we should turn all the transit lanes and bus lanes into Clearways – that way, everyone can share the roads FAIRLY! Segregating the bus lanes to be used for the people who have mundane, boring, existences who, like muppets, get driven to the same place everyday, is unfair on people who live exciting and carefree lives!!! WE want to feel ALIVE!!! And guess what… I am of the young generation… and our futuristic ways of thinking mean as soon as you’re all dead, we’ll be spending the rest of our lives undoing your ancient, dinosauric, stupid ways!!!!!

      1. Amusing comment. The thing is that the buses generally aren’t running around empty – especially at peak times. As I’m sure you noticed while catching a bus along the Northern Busway at peak times, they’re pretty full. The Northern Busway carries the equivalent of two lanes of traffic down the Northern Motorway each weekday, and still has plenty of room to grow.

        I guess that’s the beauty of bus lanes, they use road-space more efficiently. They enable you to shift more people along a corridor of a fixed width than you could with two lanes of general traffic.

      2. lol, Plenty of people view staring at the tail lights crawl along the Auckland motor ways at 20-30km/h for an hour each day a mundane and boring.

        Auckland PT system caries about 150000 trips a day. A lot of those users have cars that they chose to leave at home. If you think PT is stupid you should just keep it yourself, else you might convince PT users to take there car’s instead. It won’t take a big portion of those 150000 trips a day to take Auckland tragic from bad to unbearable.

        Have you traveled overseas much Dalton? Ever been to a city like Hong Kong with a world class transport system? I guess you think all the residents of Manhattan, Hong Kong, Central London etc have boring lives.

        Of course people in the future will look back at mistakes previous generations have made. I think wasting the bulk of the worlds oil for a purpose as primitive as burning it for fuel will be seen as the major mistake of our generation (yes im young too).

      3. Bwahahahahahaha.

        All I can say is good luck getting a cab return from the Shore to the Airport for $82 for 2 people. Maybe from the city return at a push, but certainly not from the Shore.

      4. I’m almost certain the Dalton is taking the piss… almost.

        But anyway, for the record a ‘Northern Flyer’ pass valid for travel on the Northern Express and the Airbus costs $15 each way. You’d need to have four people travelling together before it was cheaper to take a taxi from the Shore to the Airport. And every time I’ve used either the NEX or the Airbus they were pretty much full. Faster depends on the traffic of course, at peak time a busway bus is going to smoke a taxi on the Northern Motorway!

        Also where I live I can take public transport pretty much anywhere in any direction, usually faster that I could drive. I’ve never felt more ‘alive’ than when I stopped spending two hours a day sitting in traffic on the motorway. Who’s the muppet exactly? I’d say the people that pay through the nose for cars, insurance, registration and petrol just to waste a quarter of their free time each day just getting around!

    6. Dalton, I don’t like your tone of voice. You Teenagers are all the same, you don’t know how good you’ve got it. When I was a lad, I used to catch the bus home after school – The old 149 only came once an hour, and it was usually up to an hour and half late, sometimes It just wouldn’t show up at all, and old Herby would have to walk home in a blizzard, with no shoes on, uphill. But I never complained. And of course on the rare occassion I was 1 or 2 minutes late to the bus station, the 149 would be right on time and I would miss it, which is obiously a goverment conspiracy to screw old Herb. We never had bus lanes in my day, and life was good, you never heard me complain! All this new technology is part of the governments evil plan to try and control us, But I am no Robot, Whilst all you other sheep are playing follow the leader, old Herby is refusing to conform to the rules of the man. The Government took my drivers licence, the Nazis took my thumbs, and my own brother Albert took my wife, but you know what folks? No one can take my freedom!!

      kindest regards,

      Herbert G. Simmons

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *