Having finally got the 30 year Regional Land Transport Strategy completed, it’s important to look at the question “where to next?” This is particularly important to consider when you realise how the whole management of transport in Auckland is going to be revolutionised in the next few months, with the creation of the Auckland Transport CCO. This vast change in how transport will be run in Auckland is both a huge risk and a huge opportunity, as there will be the chance to start from scratch in some respects, but at the same time there is also the opportunity to build on gains made in the past few years.

With a potential vacuum during the changeover from ARTA and a pile of transport departments in each council roll into the new Auckland Transport agency, I think it’s important that there are some clear plans for what gets done in the next five years in particular. Obviously ARTA has its transport plans, and each individual council have their plans, NZTA have their plans and so forth, but for the first time in the near future we will see most of these plan come together (unfortunately Auckland Transport will still have no real power over the state highway or railway system) and we will have the opportunity to actually start giving effect to the very many plans and strategies that are sitting around.

Probably the best indicator of current thinking about what transport will be constructed, or have its planning advanced with a mind towards construction in the not too distant future, is laid out in ARTA’s 2009-2012 Regional Land Transport Programme. Keeping in mind that this only covers three years, and that we’re already one year into its timeframe, it’s a bit more shorter-term than what I think we need to be considering, but it’s still a useful starting point. Here are some of the major projects in the current programme:

Major local roading and State highway projects which are scheduled to be constructed in the 2009/10–2011/12 programme are:

  • The Central Connector.
  • SH1 Newmarket Viaduct.
  • SH18 Hobsonville Deviation.
  • New roading connections and improvements associated with the New Lynn rail trenching and transport interchange.
  • Major roading projects in new development areas, especially Flat Bush, East Tamaki and Pukekohe.
  • Bus priority programmes.
  • Major pavement reconstruction.

In addition there will be significant funding in the following public transport areas in the three-year time period of the RLTP:

  • Integrated fares and ticketing and the completion of the real time public information system.
  • Trains
  • Significant rail station upgrades will take place during the RLTP period, including major new transport interchanges at Newmarket, New Lynn and Manukau. KiwiRail will continue its programme of signalling upgrades and double tracking. The Western Line double tracking is expected to be completed by June 2010.
  • Electrification will build on the momentum achieved in Auckland rail over the past five years in which patronage has grown from just over 2 million to over 7 million passenger trips per year. Seat capacity will be increased by at least 12.5 % over the three-year period as a result of additional and longer trains in service as more refurbished carriages are brought into operation. The Government has given its commitment to electrifying Auckland’s rail network and is working with the region on the mechanisms to deliver an electrified rail network.
  • Buses
  • Service improvements will be implemented on the Isthmus, Waitakere, North West Rodney, Manukau and Papakura including better connections to rail stations.
  • Ferries
  • Half Moon Bay ferry terminal upgrade.
  • Hobsonville ferry terminal in conjunction with new housing development.
  • Bayswater ferry terminal design.
  • Birkenhead – installation of hydraulic ramp.

Major schemes proposed for study, investigation and design stage include:

  • CBD Rail Tunnel.
  • Crash reduction studies in Auckland City, Waitakere and Franklin.
  • Freight Transhipment studies on the State highway network.
  • Designation of Constellation to Albany busway extension.
  • Albany Highway Corridor upgrade.
  • CBD Waterfront access.

Extending this programme out by a couple more years would allow the new Transport Agency to be a bit more visionary, and also reflects that many of these projects (Hobsonville Deviation, Newmarket Viaduct, Central Connector, railway station upgrades etc.) are already under construction and are therefore not really relevant for considering what new projects should be prioritised over the next five years.

I think splitting the type of project up into roads, public transport and other (such as walking/cycling/other pedestrian improvements) is quite a useful start, and I also think that it’s useful to consider whether we would hope to be constructing this project within the next five years, or whether the main focus is on planning/design/consenting etc. Many of the bigger projects are obviously going to be mainly in the planning and design phase, and the important thing will be to ensure that everything is ready to go once we have the money available or once the need for the project becomes particularly clear.

Another thing to keep in mind is that the distinctions between projects can at times be fuzzy, particularly the question of whether a roading upgrade with bus lanes should be counted as a roading project or as a public transport project. I generally make the distinction based on the issue of “who benefits most?” By in large, new roads will benefit motorists the most, even if they have peak hour bus lanes, so therefore I would put that under roads. In contrast, turning part of an existing road into bus lanes primarily benefits public transport users, so therefore would be a public transport project.

OK well let’s start with roading projects, and as shown in the table below there is a particular focus on state highway projects already underway, or those that are likely to be underway in the not too distant future. The list looks fairly short, but I think it’s important to keep in mind that “other arterial road improvements” is quite broad, and there are likely to be a number of areas where arterial road upgrades are either constructed, or get close to being constructed, during this time period:

I don’t think anything is particularly controversial there, apart from perhaps the priority I have given to PenLink. I’ll have a think about that one a bit more myself, but my general thinking behind it is based on the current route to Whangaparaoa being a huge dogleg detour, and therefore the gains from constructing PenLink do see to be long-lasting and real. Note that I do not include the widening of State Highway 16 in my list, as I think it’s stupid for us to waste $800 million widening a motorway just to watch it fill up again with induced demand. Also unsurprisingly I think that just a Warkworth bypass and a safety upgrade of SH1 between Puhoi and Wellsford is needed, rather than a multi-billion dollar holiday highway.

In terms of public transport projects, obviously my list is rather longer – perhaps because that’s an area where I have greater interest, or perhaps because we really are coming to the end of roading projects in Auckland that need to be undertaken, and most of the remaining list of transport projects are related to improving public transport. Looking at the projects I would want to see under construction (or implemented might be a more encompassing term) I think what should come across most obviously is that they’re mostly about buses. There are two big rail projects within the next five years: the completion of Project DART and rail electrification. That should keep us busy enough, along with some platform lengthening, perhaps the addition of a Parnell/University station and the very much needed third track between Wiri and Westfield.

The reason I have focused so much on bus projects in the next five years is because they are relatively quick and easy to implement: as Human Transit’s latest blog post notes, it’s a heck of a lot cheaper and faster to put some paint on a road (bus lane) than it is to build rail. So there are key bus-based projects, like getting an interim QTN (Quality Transit Network – read bus lanes) up and running between Panmure and Botany (and also between Botany and Manukau I should probably add), upgrading Dominion Road: hopefully to light-rail but potentially in the shorter term just to having better quality bus lanes, getting a QTN operational along the SH18 corridor as that develops, and perhaps most critically: getting bus lanes in operation along all the nominated QTN corridors. This shouldn’t be a particularly expensive project, it just needs some willpower. Other important projects for implementation include a complete redesign of the bus route system, so the it better reflects the integrated ticketing system we will have and so that it takes advantage of the “network effect” benefits I have described previously. There are probably some other ferry upgrades that will be required, hopefully taking advantage of integrated ticketing and a simplified bus route structure to encourage people to catch feeder buses to their ferries.

In terms of design/consenting, here’s where more of the “big ticket items” emerge, such as the CBD Rail Tunnel, rail to the airport, the extension of the busway to Albany and the southeast Auckland RTN (hopefully in the form of a Howick/Botany Line). The Regional Land Transport Strategy highlights many of these projects for construction in the 2020-2040 period, except for the CBD rail tunnel which is recognised as crucial for construction by 2021, but I think it’s essential that the routes for all these projects are protected and that they are pretty much “ready to go” as soon as the funding and political will is there to push the go button. Not future-proofing or protecting the routes of important transport projects can lead to disaster, if someone builds something really big in the way, so I think it’s essential there’s a really big push to sort them out as soon as possible. I also think that extensions of the little tram network we will have hopefully created between Wynyard Quarter and Britomart will become increasingly sensible in the future, so doing the background work to extend the system along Tamaki Drive and Dominion Road seems sensible to me. Finally, in terms of projects that would be at their initial investigation phase, I have put a North Shore railway line and the Avondale Southdown railway line into this group. These projects are likely to be some of the later “big ticket items”, but it’s still useful in my opinion to be analysing them and working out which routes/options we would want to proceed with.

Turning to walking, cycling and other projects, these are projects that are mainly about improving the lot for pedestrians and cyclists. There are a few “big ticket items”, like the Harbour Bridge Cycleway idea which seems to be proceeding quite well, but many others are just about changing around existing areas to make them more pedestrian friendly. Rolling out the shared streets idea more and more is an example of that.

The great thing about walking and cycling improvements is that they generally aren’t particularly expensive. For just a few million you can get many kilometres of cycleway, whereas by comparison the Victoria Park Tunnel project costs nearly a million dollars a metre to build. Some of the other projects to implement, such as lowering the speed on non-arterial routes, wouldn’t cost anything (apart from signage) but would contribute significantly to making our city more friendly and livable I think. In the longer term, I really do hope that bigger and potentially more challenging projects such as pedestrianising parts of Queen Street and Quay Street can be possible. If we had a tram running up and down Queen Street, to connect our Wynyard Quarter tramway with a Dominion Road one, that could mix quite well with an otherwise pedestrianised street.

Well anyway, that’s my idea of a transport plan for Auckland over the next 5 years. It’s a lot of work, but then the new Auckland Transport agency will be sucking up a lot of money so it should be able to achieve a plan like this, at least the parts that it can control. There’s generally nothing much new in my plan, apart from the Howick/Botany railway line and my tramway ideas, but instead it’s all about implementing what’s in the RLTS and in ARTA’s 10 year “Auckland Transport Plan“. In terms of the focus on buses, this is because doing so is a “low hanging fruit” – potentially big benefits for relatively low cost. But at the same time, I think it’s critical the big ticket items are progressed, at lest in terms of getting all the design and consenting done so that once funding is available they are ready to go.

I am sure I’ve missed things, or that there are parts of this plan people disagree with. So it’d be great to get some feedback on it, so I can refine it and hopefully eventually turn these basic ideas into something that might really make a difference.

Share this

13 comments

  1. High St shared space. Put the Vic St carpark exit onto Vic St rent out the space where the exits used to be as shops. Make the retailers get deliveries in the early morning and there should be no reason for anyone to drive on that road during civilised hours.

  2. I agree James that High Street seems like the most obvious candidate for a shared space upgrade. However, the council spent quite a bit of money repaving the footpaths just a few years back, so unfortunately it’s unlikely that it’ll be touched for a while. Which is damn frustrating.

  3. Focussing on buses and cycling/walking is the best way to make a fundamental change in Auckland, using technologies the people understand and accept and very cost-effectively… I like it (but I’d include parking reform too)…

  4. At the risk of sounding like a motorway nut, another thing they could do is build some on and off ramps for the Northern Motorway south of the city. This would I think eliminate a lot of the through traffic along K road and make the prospect of a shared space or mall much easier to justify.

  5. James, I think that it’s be damn hard fitting anything extra into CMJ now. There are something like 18 lanes of traffic underneath the K Road bridge for example.

    If you make K Road difficult enough for through traffic, people will find alternatives.

  6. I know it would be difficult but given the amount of money being thrown at motorways they could come up with some solution. To my uneducated eye there looks to be enough room for both on and off ramps at Newton Road.

    The unfortunate thing is that there aren’t a lot of options, I often travel between Dominion Road and the North Shore and find that I really only have 2 choices, K Road or Ponsonby Road.

  7. I actually have a vague memory that Transit (as they were then) did look at the idea of having north-facing ramps on Newton Road. I think they put it into the “too hard basket” though, as already it seemed like they had to thread a needle is squeezing so much through a constrained space.

    Getting rid of the defunct Nelson Street off-ramp could free up some space though.

  8. I don’t think that there is room for a ramp from K Rd but there does seem to be room for one from at the bottom of Gundry St, there is already an access ramp and with a little retaining wall enough space could be made to make it a permanent onramp with merging lane. Spending a bit more money could build the ramp from Newton Rd

  9. Yeah that’s what I figured as well and an exit to Newton Road from the Northern Motorway to Western Motorway ramp. It would remove the need for cars coming and going from the south of the CBD to go through K Road/Pitt St or Howe St. Then put a shared space or bus only lanes on K Road between Queen St and Pitt St.

  10. They did look briefly at north facing ramps between sh1 and the queen st overbridge when designing the cmj upgrade. I think the idea was to connect them to the new port links but they dropped it due to the poor geometry and the desire not to add yet another pair of links into the maelstrom.

  11. I must say I am a little surprised at the presence of the SH1 to SH20 connection in your list of future roading projects. I honestly can’t see why a connection should even be considered considering the pressing needs elsewhere in Auckland. With the new WRR and the Manukau motoroway, how many more connections between these two motorways do we need. One billion would go a long way to upgrading the freight lines in this area and in my view that is what should be encouraged. I’m also dismayed at the current push elsewhere for the extension of the motorway through the Strand to the ports – for obvious reasons.

  12. RTC, it’s effectively sitting in investigation to work out if/when it might be needed and also what form it should take. There’s nothing that convinces me that we need to do more than simply upgrading the SE arterial interchange (so traffic from Onehunga can easily go south down SH1) plus a bit of an upgrade to Neilson Street.

    Those pushing for a full motorway standard road just seem to want it to look pretty on a map, not because the current route is woefully inadequate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *