Now that the $400 million Orewa-Puhoi Motorway has been shown to have done nothing to alleviate congestion north of Auckland (instead it has simply shifted the bottleneck from Orewa to Warkworth), it seems like there is quite a lot of talk about what should be done about this problem. As I explained a week or so ago, one solution could simply be for everyone to not drive at the same time, but if we are to spend a lot of money to “do something” about the bottlenecks north of Auckland, I really think that we should potentially look a bit outside the square for a solution. I also think that it’s truly bizarre that NZTA are widening State Highway 1 through Warkworth at the same time as having plans to bypass the town.

Further north there is a potentially useful template for what could be done around Warkworth, and that is the way in which Wellsford is progressively being bypassed – not through some grand massively expensive state highway bypass, but instead through a simple local road upgrade a decent chunk of the vehicles that used to pass through there to get to Mangawhai Heads, Langs Beach and potentially even Waipu Cove, now have an alternative route to use and don’t have to go through Wellsford. The roads have always been there, but over the past few years they have been fully sealed, and slowly the signage has been improved to encourage more and more people to take this route. I think that once a proposed improvement to the intersection with State Highway 1 is constructed, this will become the main route to that part of the coast.

The map below shows a comparison of the old route (red) and the new one (blue). As a bonus, the new route shaves around 5 minutes off the travel time, even off-peak:

Unfortunately there’s not such an obvious bypass route for Warkworth, although the potential is there as I discovered during a rather interesting detour on our way up north a few days back. As shown in the map below, at the moment if one is to bypass Warkworth (the blue route) then the route is a pretty arduous one (particularly as a reasonable chunk of it is unsealed). If that route was completely sealed then I guess it could be a useful overflow point if things are particularly nasty, but during off-peak times it’s probably going to take about three or four times as long as sticking to SH1.

The green route in the map below shows a potentially much shorter bypass of Warkworth, once again using existing roads (except for the short dotted area which would need to be built). Unless there’s a huge mountain where the dotted line is (which there may well be around there), then I think building this bypass would basically achieve what we need: a good alternative route to the state highway that runs through the town.

Instead of a fairly logical and simple solution, such as this, we are seeing a two-pronged approach from NZTA: firstly to widen SH1 through Warkworth to four-lanes, and secondly to build an unbelievably expensive full motorway bypass from Puhoi to Wellsford – the infamous “holiday highway”.

Here are NZTA’s plans for widening the road through Warkworth:

So instead of a relatively inexpensive solution, we have one project that will cut Warkworth in half with a wide high-speed road through the middle of it, and then we have a super-expensive motorway option that is likely to have a cost-benefit ratio of barely 0.3 (not that that will necessarily stop it from happening). I guess that a modest proposal like my suggested bypass route wouldn’t get as many headlines as the “roads of national significance”. Which just shows where transport thinking is heading.

Share this

19 comments

  1. I think spending over $2bil on a 4 lane road past Wellsford is a silly idea when for probably much less than a quarter of that we could get similar benefits, things like bypassing Warkworth would make a huge difference. Looking at the second map I would probably have the bypass go from the corner under the second SH1 sign from the top straight up to where the green line joins the existing road north of the town.

  2. What the above map doesn’tshow is that the Hill St intersection along SH1 will have a free left hand turn lane, one or two through lanes, two right turning lanes and two lanes on the other side. This means that pedestrians(who don’t register in the equation at all) will need to cross potentially seven lanes, most likely in two phases to get from one side to the other. In reading the notice of requirement the middle traffic island isn’t wide enough for a mobility scooter or groups of school children who need to cross this road daily. The town centre will be cut off from its surrounding residential catchment so much that locals will be forced to drive into town when previously they had a choice to walk a short distance. Looking further from this intersection the reconfiguration of Sandspit Rd and Matakana Road means that people living to the north of the town will have to walk an extra 500m to the Hill St intersection to get into the main part of the town. There are a lot of older people in the area that will no longer feel safe to walk in such a hostile environment. There are other options for other road connections east-west between SH1 and Matakana ROad but this would be a cost to the local council and not NZTA which is why it isn’t happening. It is much easier for them to make a bigger intersection through the middle of town rather than think outside the square and work cooperatively with the locals to get a better solution.

  3. Good work Joshua. Check out the seven lane Hill St- SH1-Sandspit Rd intersection which needs slip lanes (why?) in order to make it even more dangerous for the locals to move about their own town. I notice that they fail to mention that the intersection is bordered by a school on one side with a Retirement Village 200m up Sandspit Rd. Presumably they are not worried about school children who will have to run chicken accross the intersection or the elderly who might like to walk into town

    The Arborist report makes good reading, too in that a large number of significant trees (Totaras, Kauri, Pohutakawa) which will be removed which will definitely change the character of the town. Many will be replaced by a large retaining wall which should provide a good noise funnel straight up the main street. I assume whoever did this design was not a local.

  4. That is one huge intersection they plan to build and in typical NZ style slip lanes without a pedestrian crossing on them – just lovely.

  5. Admin, as you suggested earlier- rationing is the way to go. Identify the 3-5 busiest days. Tell drivers that they can only use the toll road before noon if their license plates starts with an A-L. If traffic starts backing up, drivers without the proper license plates get diverted into the Ride Share lot and the stadium parking lot in Albany. Service the waiting areas with free coffee, live music, etc.

    It is insane to design/build infrastructure based on a few days a heavy traffic.

  6. Some good ideas there. I think you can do a lot to ration use throughout peak periods – especially when people are flexible in the time they can leave to go on holiday. It’s not exactly the same as rush hour to get to work, when you really do have to be there by a certain hour of the day.

    Some ways in which you could ration use

    Firstly, have excellent communication about how congested the road is. Includes having people sign up for free texts telling them how long it will take from Orewa to Warkworth. Could also include an 0800 number with information, an up to the minute website and so on. The key is for people to be able to find out how bad it is before they get there, so they can put off travelling for a few hours if it’s particularly nasty. I don’t think it’s good enough to say “it’s congested” either, say exactly how long it will take to get from A to B.

    Secondly, look at ways to ration use. Perhaps the $2 toll through the tunnel should be raised during holiday times. Perhaps a charge at peak times should be applied to cars travelling over the Pohuehue viaduct to encourage them to travel at other times. To make it more politically palatable, the extra money raised could be spent on waiving tolls for people travelling at off-peak times like after 9pm or before 7am.

    Thirdly, just do some minor upgrades. The Puhoi-Wellsford road clearly is sub-standard in parts. However that doesn’t mean you need to build a massive four lane motorway for 40km. Bypass Warkworth, straighten a few nasty corners, lengthen some passing lanes and I reckon 90% of the problem would be fixed.

  7. @Admin – I am really hoping that the investigaion into the Puhoi to Wellsford Rd identifies some of the smaller improvements like you mention as making a huge difference with a small cost comapared to going 4 lanes for the whole way. Unfortunetly I just don’t see this happening and Joyce will likely just go the whole hog anyway.

  8. I think Joyce will go the whole way too – or at least want to. Not for any logical reason, but just because he wants the grand headlines.

    Jeremy, I feel a bit depressed that the government doesn’t want to save that $2 billion.

  9. One of the funny things is that even if National have 9 years in office like the last government they will likely not be in power by the time most of these projects are finished and that will leave Labour to open them and (if sucessful) take the credit for them.

  10. To be fair the government did pay a big part in project dart and electrification

    they managed to make everyone feel like it was never going to happen then poof they comfirmed it would proceed, so what there was some delay. Also they managed to make sure we wern’t going to get any electric trains before the world cup, nor intergrated ticketing, are they going to surprise us with the anouncement on thursday?

    And of course all those other public transport projects they have promised;

    1)

    2)

    Yea sorry nothing came up.

    Haha but they did pay a part.

  11. LOL, yes the list of new public transport projects that this government has come up with is very short…. hold on, I think non-existent is a better term.

  12. There was the um… ??? …

    $700 million for PT subsidies over the next 3 years, at least it was announced as a big increase in PT funding (but actually with increase in ridership equals a reduction)…

  13. The simple answer is to rename Orewa to Christchurch North. That will gaurantee that there will be ten years of “consulting” before NZTA stumps up with any funding for actual road works.

  14. I think your Warkworth bypass route is easier to achieve than you think.

    I looked at your green coloured bypass route around Warkworth, showing a gap between Perry Rd and Wyllie Rd that needs to be connected. On googlemaps there is already a paper road going exactly where your dotted lines run!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *