I never quite imagined that I would say it, but I agree 100% with John Banks’s opinion piece in the NZ Herald today:

I seek nothing less than Auckland becoming the aspirational capital of the South Pacific. Modern Auckland is a successful city.

It generates 34 per cent of the country’s wealth and is home to a third of the country’s population. It houses more than two-thirds of our biggest companies and is our only truly internationally competitive metropolis.

Quite simply, New Zealand needs Auckland to work, and for that to happen, it needs to work efficiently. Auckland cannot rely on roads and motorways alone to meet the region’s future transport needs, as the city’s roading network is already nearing the practical limits of expansion.

The number of trips made on Auckland’s transport system by 2051 is expected to increase by 65 per cent from 3.2 million to 5.2 million a day.

Plans for an underground rail loop from Britomart southward underneath the CBD to Mt Eden have been debated for nearly a century.

Initial economic evaluation of the CBD tunnel shows that it attracts a higher return than many major roading projects of a similar scale, particularly as rail can shift much larger numbers than any other mode.

The solution to Auckland’s transport challenges and future transport needs lies in having an integrated network that provides people with a variety of travel choices, including enhanced rail access to the central city.

The Western Ring Route, State Highway 20 and incremental improvements to other motorway networks and roads are critical. However, these improvements and the new Central Connector and development of the bus lane network will meet future demands only if we complete a fully integrated transport system, including a CBD rail loop.

The capacity of Britomart at peak times would potentially more than double to 40 trains per hour, if it were a through-station. These are compelling reasons why we need to push through Britomart, up under Albert St, beneath Karangahape Rd and on to Mt Eden and Kingsland.

Because of its higher capacity, rail is the most effective and efficient way of providing for Auckland’s growth in travel demand, especially to the congested CBD.

The proposed CBD tunnel will dramatically improve accessibility to downtown Auckland, as it will:

Provide two additional central CBD stations, creating excellent direct rail access to CBD commercial, employment, shopping and cultural activities.

Remove the constraint at Britomart, allowing dramatically improved train frequencies on the whole rail system.

Investment in the CBD rail loop delivers less congestion and agglomeration benefits that will benefit the whole region.

This equals growth in economic productivity and to New Zealand heading back to the top half of the OECD.

For example, good quality inner-city public transport makes great city centres more accessible and supports new, high-value jobs for people from throughout the region.

This CBD loop is no ordinary transport project. This project looks ahead 100 years, to the kind of centre a true super city aspires to.

Super cities all over the world have strong centres and with vision, good design and a sound business case, this project unlocks the potential of Auckland’s centre by enabling much greater access from all parts of the region. This will reinforce the existing role of central Auckland as a regional destination for workers, students and residents and it will cater for the projected growth in the size and intensity of the centre of Greater Auckland.

Enhancing access through a CBD rail loop is critical to the central area’s contribution to lifting the entire region’s (and therefore the country’s) economic performance.

This rail loop is more than a rail link. It is a transformational economic development project at the centre of the new Super City.

Think of London’s Circle Line and of other examples, like Sydney, where the centre acts as a hub for the transport network for the whole region.

Let’s come to the crunch. I clearly understand that this Government is cash-strapped and staring in the face of mountainous debt.

The currently estimated cost of a CBD rail loop is between $1 billion and $1.5 billion. If the rail loop is not constructed, we do have a good handle on that cost, which includes further road and motorway construction to meet demand (at least $3.3 billion for roading and additional parking capacity, according to the Auckland Regional Transport Authority’s latest estimate).

Of course we cannot nail all of these figures precisely. However I am confident that informed citizens of Auckland are united in their belief that a CBD rail loop is a good idea.

So this is John Banks, former petrol-head, promoter of the infamous Eastern Motorway during his previous term as Mayor, supporting money being spent on this rail project instead of on the roading projects that ARTA has identified in its plans. This is fantastic for the prospects of this link, as it clearly shows that support for the CBD Rail Tunnel is not just for weirdo left rail nuts, but coming from everyone.

Share this

18 comments

  1. I suspect the business lobby is finally starting to see the economic benefits for them that will accrue from having a strong vibrant CBD. The only problem now are the Wellington Treasury and MoT dinosaur mandarins.

  2. I think Banks is trying to out-flank the left wing on the left… I’d rather he’s say this than the opposite however… I underestimated him, he’s a cleverer politican than I gave him credit for…

  3. Is calling the Treasury and MoT dinosaur mandarins what you say when you can’t get a job there?

    Just saying, since I know more than a few people in both organisations and to be fair they are very robust analysts. After all this is about tradeoffs between competing expenditure, which is inevitably broader than anything discussed in this blog. Like I’ve said before it is helpful to understand what drives advice to Ministers rather than dismissing it.

  4. I think that generally the analysts probably do their jobs well. I guess the problem lies with what they analyse. I guess the fact that Transmission Gully’s incredibly low BCR was published makes me hopeful that the business cases for projects are not too messed with for political reasons. I wonder what will happen with Puhoi-Wellsford in that respect.

  5. Like most things, the analysts, planners, consultants, engineers et al. all seem to do a pretty good job, but all they can do is provide advice.

    It is the politicians and boards that actually make the decisions, about what to analyse in the first place, and more importantly, what to listen to and what to ignore after the fact.

  6. What he says now and what he does later may have very little resemblance to each other. Like all Tories, he will say what it takes to get elected.

  7. I agree Lindsey. However, at least he’s saying this and putting pressure on Steven Joyce to wake up and realise how popular this project is.

  8. Aaron you must admit it is a pretty amazing change, from hardcore advocate of the Eastern Motorway to this. I don’t think anyone it criticising Banks here, we are just hoping this is not too good to be true.

  9. Dare I say that Transmission Gully was only revived after considerable pressure from:
    – Porirua City Council;
    – Peter Dunne;
    – Margaret Shields;
    – Kapiti Coast District Council;
    – Winnie Laban;
    – Darren Hughes.

    In that order. GWRC, MoT, Treasury, LTNZ and the board of LTNZ were opposed to Transmission Gully. Wellington City Council was as well, whilst the Hutt councils were non-committal, understandably. Ministers by and large accepted this, but saw a political price that might be paid in Porirua and Kapiti for rejecting Transmission Gully, so money was thrown from general taxation into investigation and design. Remember this was under the last government. This government has so far done nothing except NZTA is continuing the commitment to pay the contracts for investigation and design. The results of that do not look good for Transmission Gully, and Steven Joyce is reportedly very lukewarm on it. Upgrading the current highway is far more attractive financially and economically.

    I suspect Eastern Motorway simply became unaffordable, and Banks will advocate “more money for Auckland” generally.

    I know AMETI will make a small impact, with a Panmure bypass, but I hope the designation for the eastern corridor remains. However, any development of it needs to be driven by demand and willingness to pay.

  10. I think out south (from my travels) the South Eastern from Onehunga to Pakuranga could be upgraded to motorway standard with a few grade seperations at intersections and a couple of interchanges… That would be a good start, I haven’t been down Te Irirangi drive for years but I understand it is possible here too, might be two cost effective improvements out east…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *