A couple of years ago, we asked for your help to keep Greater Auckland ticking along, and you responded with enthusiasm. We are so grateful to everyone who has chipped in – whether as a one-off, a recurring contribution, or the gift of pro-bono expertise.
Your contributions have given us the space and energy to tackle some of the vital administrative and editorial mahi that keeps Greater Auckland going, while building the foundation to do more.
The biggest step – which involved substantial work behind the scenes – is that we’re now a registered charity. You may have also noticed updates to the website, and a new and improved mailing system that delivers fresh posts right to your inbox (which you can subscribe to here!), and a lot more.
Over the last few years we also:
- Published hundreds of posts
- Provided regular commentary in media and written op-eds
- Advocated to Auckland Council and Auckland Transport on a variety of topics, including influencing the CRL timetable, and fixing Project K
- Hosted in person events, and started making videos (more to come!)
And a lot more.
This would not have been possible without your support and donations, and your belief in us and the mission.

We believe Greater Auckland is a unique voice, which plays a vital role in our city.
With a focus on urban issues in Tāmaki Makaurau – housing policy, city planning and transport – we provide in-depth and ongoing coverage of topics that often go overlooked, breaking stories and highlighting angles that traditional media can then pick up on.
Our timely commentary and evidence-led analysis is sought out and relied upon by readers of all kinds – from local community members to interested citizens around the motu, to those embedded in government and the relevant professional sectors, and even internationally, with Patrick and Connor recently invited to meet a delegation from Seoul, South Korea.

Patrick and Connor meeting with a delegation from the Seoul Facilities Corporation, South Korea.

Our City Nerd event at Ellen Melville
We believe our insights lead to a higher level of discussion (including in our vigorous comments section!) and better-informed public participation, helping to shape better outcomes for our city.
And this role is more important than ever, given the increasing demands on everyone’s attention and fewer opportunities to really dig into the questions that affect how we live now.
Already, 50,000 people a month read Greater Auckland. Our stories receive thousands of views within hours of publication, and many receive tens of thousands.
But take a minute to imagine if we weren’t around. Where would you turn to, for swift and independent takes on the latest in housing and transport policy affecting our city? For objective analysis of the data? For follow-up questions in the public interest? For proposals of better ways to do things?
We are fiercely independent, which is what allows us to do what we do. Every article written on Greater Auckland – constituting an archive of receipts that goes back almost two decades – has been contributed on a volunteer basis.
Thousands of Matt’s insightful and detailed posts and charts, Patrick’s relentlessly inspiring visions for Auckland, Connor’s tenacious OIA deep-dives, Jolisa’s eloquent appeals, the hundreds of deep and transformative posts from our revolving core crew over the years (you know who you are, and we love you!), the many guest posts we seek out and gratefully share, our collectively authored editorials and weekly round-ups of top stories… and so much more.
All of this is brought to you on a volunteer basis and given to you, our readers, for absolutely free. No paywall, no barrier – free for everyone to access, enjoy and share.
And we really want to keep it that way.
But times are changing. Our lives and day jobs are busier, and we’re feeling the pressure. We want to ensure Greater Auckland remains sustainable over the long haul – and we also want to do a lot more, to continue expanding the impact of our work.
And to do more, we need to dedicate sustained and consistent attention across time, and that doesn’t come free.

Matt’s comments to 1News in March of this year. Our advocacy to Auckland Council and Auckland Transport helped gain significant improvements in the planned post-CRL timetable.
Greater support from our community will enable us to improve the quality and frequency of our articles, fund deeper investigative research and reporting, and – importantly – resource the engaging, high-quality campaigns showcasing the solutions that we know our city needs.
Your support will also enable us to advocate more directly, by giving more presentations and written feedback to Auckland Council, Auckland Transport, and the Government. It will allow us to expand our reach and influence via social media, and create more diverse forms of content, including video.
Notably, we’re coming up on a decade since we successfully re-set Auckland’s idea of itself with our eye-catching and ground-proofed vision for the Congestion-Free Network (2.0).
And still the debate continues over how to shape the future of transport in Auckland. What’s the best possible version of the next Harbour Crossing? How do we ensure access to great rapid transit on the isthmus? How can Auckland achieve the citywide cycle network we know we need? And so much more.
The clock is ticking and the stakes are accelerating. We can all feel it. The impacts of climate change. The opportunities of the energy revolution. The cost of living. The quality of our lives, and the air we breathe.
Plus, with City Rail Link opening this year, Aucklanders are already asking: What’s next? Not to mention, we have a general election later this year, and the impending formation of a 30-year Transport Plan for Auckland.
With so many opportunities incoming, we’d love everyone to be as informed and empowered as possible about what Auckland can aim for – and what we can achieve.
Will you help us take our work to the next level?
If you’re in a position to support us, even a little bit, you can donate here, or via the form below.
We’ve set it up to be super-flexible: if every person who reads Greater Auckland donated as little as $5 a month, we’d have a sustainable funding stream. Some extremely generous folks have been regularly donating $20, $50, or more for a long time, for which we are incredibly grateful.
We also know we’re widely read by those in the city-building professions – so we’re always open to conversations about opportunities to underwrite our work, whether by donation or on a pro-bono basis.
You can also donate directly to our bank account. Send us an email so we can thank you!
- Greater Auckland Trust
- 06-0323-0974141-00
And if you’re not in a position to donate financially right now, we get it. How about lending us your voice instead? Sharing our work with others – via social media, industry newsletters, a forwarded link, or word of mouth – is a fantastic way to invite more people into the conversation.
Thank you, everyone, for giving oomph to the mission in every way you can! Because together, we really do have the power to make our city greater every day.
Processing...
Can you give your bank account number? I prefer to direct debit to you.
No problem! It’s:
Greater Auckland Trust
06-0323-0974141-00
Thank you very much for your support Jim!
I just transferred some money but Kiwibank complains that Greater Auckland is only a partial match.
Hmm, might be the technical name for the account is ‘Greater Auckland Trust’
The number is definitely correct though!
Yes, I think it was for the account name. Maybe update the details with the full name.
“Greater Auckland Trust ” yields a total match,
This forum is great, thanks for all your hard work GA team
Donated. Appreciate all your work over the years. Made the research part of my videos on Auckland’s Urban Planning over the last 15-20 years a lot more easier thanks to your efforts.
Kia ora. Thanks for your great work! I’ve tried a few times to make a donation via the form on this page and the other donation page but I keep getting a ‘Load Failed’ error so there seems to be a bug – I’m using Safari on a Mac.
Odd, I’m seeing nothing on our side coming through, maybe try one more time?
Flick us an email if its still not working admin@greaterauckland.org.nz
You can also donate directly to our bank:
Greater Auckland Trust
06-0323-0974141-00
Thanks for your support anyhow!
Can I just say as a long time reader of the blog thank you to Matt I always enjoy reading your articles while I may not agree with everything said I think this is the best place if you’re pro alternative modes to get your information.
It’s important to have a place where people can debate these extremely important transport decisions. One thing I would say is it would be better if the blog was a little bit more open.
If your opinions are sound, you should welcome debate. Of course I respect that climate change deniers should not be tolerated as they waste data space, but someone who thinks 110 kph speed limit is safe should not have his voice drowned out in hatred, especially if that person creates a healthy discussion that raises awareness of the dangers of speeding.
I’ve seen posts removed that pointed to evidence that speed bumps cause pollution. I thought that was quite an interesting point and a topic worth investigation, but it was deleted for reasons I never quite understood.
If the blog changed the policy around the what many would consider overly restrictive comments section I would happily donate. But overall THANK YOU I’ve been reading since about 2011 and the hard work put into some of the articles really should deserve some donation especially from the early days.
I would add that to get my support, the blog needs to be mode neutral. I’m not saying we should stop advocates (or, conversely, anti) PT/cycling/Gondola folk have their say, but more mode balance, is key to me opening my wallet.
I am genuinely interested in why you say we are not mode neutral?
Do you have an example of where you think we are not?
For example, the last several articles I’ve been writing on Warkworth to Te Hana and the Northland Expressway, I’ve been pointing out a far better use of money is on smaller scale upgrades – recognising that roads are important in rural regions, and many in NZ do need safety and resilience upgrades (through in some rail in there ofc)
Who says it has to be mode-neutral? Is there a charter?
You’re free to start a mode-neutral site – but this site is predicated around public transport / rapid transit, and sustainable city spaces (cycling / walking / pedestrianization) – and is quite clear on that.
It has no obligation to treat car travel as equal – they are not equal. They are very different. Why isn’t that clear?
I agree. Echo chambers are incredibly dangerous things.
I agree. Echo chambers are incredibly dangerous things.
Plenty of studies saying the opposite.
E.g. https://rdi.org/articles/echo-chambers-are-a-myth/
Homo bulla
Thanks, Wilbert. That’s very interesting, and makes a lot of sense.
We do regularly approve comments that have different views to us, the issue comes from people who regularly ignore the content of posts, what people are actually saying in the comments they reply to, or the wider evidence on topics.
Often its the same people who do it using new accounts to skirt moderation, and will ramp up the negativity as they go.
Internet moderation is difficult, and we take the best approach we can. Others think we are too lax so what can you do!
Yeah but the blog used to be so much better than it is now. Like I mentioned I’ve been here a long time and I’ve watched it changed into more and more of an echo chamber.
I think part of the issue is the blog has gotten super one sided (politically too) it seems any investment into anything that’ll improve traffic flow or make drivers lives less miserable is automatically attacked and any traffic calming even if it’s stupid (like the blue paint in hendo that ultimately ended up in a stream somewhere) is defended almost like they are getting paid to defend it.
I’ve got a really good example I’ll link the article below but back in the day this article about temporary speed limits being annoying nowadays the blog seems to actively delete comments that want faster speeds. Ironically a lot of these speeds people were complaining about including the admin are now the recommended “safe speeds”. This is why I say it used to be better.
https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2010/12/30/the-temporary-speed-limit-that-cried-wolf/
Connor just remove the filters and let the comments through obviously monitor for threatening behaviour and spam but go back to how it was. If there is people calling for even more moderation they need to actually make their own blog and write to themselves I mean seriously it’s one of the most restrictive comments sections ever lol.
As Matt mentioned in Greater Auckland 2.0 “ we felt that having an open forum that anyone can comment on, including folk from government and industry that would prefer to remain anonymous, was preferable.”
Here’s the thing though It’s not really an ‘Open Forum’ when only carefully curated
comments survive and well
researched rebuttal that
doesn’t fit the narrative is
deleted. If you really want comments to be open, adopt
a policy supporting free speech and open debate of your blog’s content. Sometimes that might
even involve letting criticism or alternate points of view survive in the comment section.
If we’re only seeing the nonsense that they let through from you I’d hate to think what rubbish you’re writing in the comments that are blocked.
Done – thanks for everything you do.
I do think that a re-format of the comments (or maybe a separate discussion board) would be of huge help. It’s hard to navigate to replies to comments or have easy dialogue.
I don’t think it’s an echo chamber – but it definitely attracts like-minded people. And it is healthy to hear ‘the other side’ – however batshit – so you know what you’re up against, re perceptions.
Thanks for the support!
We could certainly look into improving the formatting of the comments. I have also wondered if another forum might be better (ie discord or reddit), but there is also strong value in keeping things on our own platform (not reliant on third party platforms + moderation demands).
What do you think would improve the comment sections in your eyes?
It is very hard to find new comments except for the last 10 on the landing page. So if somebody comments on last week’s post and a new post drops, there is no chance to see additions to older discussions, is there?
Another thing would be to tag the post you are referring to in a lengthy thread.
Agreed – it’s this. It’s the navigation to what is new as they are distributed across the threads… so it might just be a layout thing that is possible within the tool. And linkable posts. It might encourage more ongoing discussion long after an article has posted… esp if easier to surface new comments on the homepage. Maybe likes but less important…
And – Honestly, as for the misers who are like “I’d give you money except for one nitpicky personal preference” – but are still happy to consume people’s time and labour for free – go take a running jump.
Journalism shouldn’t be free, regardless of whether it’s bespoke to your views or not. This is more that some dude’s blog – it’s a movement with many achievements – have some respect and pony up, or get off the teat. Awful.