This is a guest post by Charmaine Vaughan, Secretary of the Meadowbank St Johns Residents’ Association, about how her community took the initiative in the face of recent mandatory speed raises. 

In Meadowbank on a sunny Saturday afternoon not so long ago, the streets were filled with the sounds of birds singing and kids out and about by themselves. What a joy to hear kids’ voices chattering in conversation and delight at the freedom of being out and about by themselves on an adventure.

Standing there, I was struck by the immersiveness of the experience: this, I realised, is what safer streets mean to children. 

The evidence shows that 30kmh streets are safer for everyone, especially vulnerable road users (children, older people, disabled people, pets). In real terms, this translates into parents and caregivers feeling safe to let children venture to the playground, pop to the dairy, make their own way to their friends’ houses, and even make their own way to school.

Thanks to safe speed limits, kids get to enjoy the freedom a lot of us enjoyed when we were their age, when streets were inherently safer because there was less traffic.

Parent and child on Te Ara ki Uta ki Tai, the Glen Innes to Tamaki Drive shared path – accessible via the streets of Meadowbank if they’re safe to cycle on


Government made a choice

Sadly, as of 1 July this freedom – to explore their communities and get to school independently by foot, scooter or bike – has come to an end for the children of Meadowbank and many, many other communities across Tāmaki Makaurau and the rest of Aotearoa.

That’s because of the Government’s new Speed Rule. You probably know the whole sorry story. Against the advice of experts, the government has forced councils to raise speed limits. This includes removing neighbourhood-wide 30km/h zones anywhere that safer speeds were introduced because a school was nearby.

Yes, that’s counterintuitive, to put it mildly. (And replacing these 30km/h neighbourhoods with tiny time-limited zones at school gates makes it less safe for children to get to school, let alone around their local community).

Relentless advocacy ensued across the motu, with conversations, meetings and emails happening at every level from cabinet ministers to local MPs, councillors, and local boards. Communities rallied together to raise their concerns. The impact hit Tamaki Makaurau hardest, with over 1400 streets around over a hundred schools in dozens of neighbourhoods falling under the shadow of the new Speed Rule.

Advocates, experts and councils battled to bring evidence and nuance to the situation, leading to a variety of different outcomes. Some road-controlling authorities chose to interpret the central government’s new Speed Rule in ways that kept safer speeds around schools. This leadership spurred those of us in Tamaki Makaurau to advocate even harder – but sadly our road-controlling authority, Auckland Transport, did not interpret the Rule the same way.

We fought the return of unsafe speeds till the very end, or at least what felt like the end, as the new 50kmh signage started appearing around the city.

But then, just as I’d sent my final, last-ditch email appealing for a reprieve, I remembered a key fact.


Communities can choose, too

In my local community of Meadowbank, when Auckland Transport consulted us in 2021, 70% of people supported safer speeds. And in an even more recent Residents’ Association survey, 77% supported safer speeds.

In other words, our community chose 30kmh… not just once, but twice!

An idea formed in my mind. Why not share this fact where people can see it?

So the Meadowbank St Johns Residents Association designed and produced twenty signs, expressing our preference for safe and people-friendly streets.

We’re now installing them in key locations around the neighbourhood, which includes two schools, a kindy and a retirement village, a train station, and a major walking and cycling route that links us all the way to the city and out to Glen Innes.

To be clear, these are not official speed signs – they’re advisory signs. They offer a community point of view, in conversation with the new 50kmh speed signs. They remind everyone, including those new to the neighbourhood or just visiting, that this community strongly prefers calmer streets. Because they’re safer, and they’re more neighbourly.

Other residential areas are welcome to borrow this approach. The government didn’t ask us before raising speeds. So it’s perfectly fair for communities to express what we think.


Choosing to express ourselves: how we did it

I am lucky enough to be part of a great Residents’ Association, which believes that our streets are a key asset in making this a great place to live, for people of all ages. So when I suggested my idea, they were all supportive. An added bonus is that we have funds in the bank to cover the $290 to print 20 corflute signs.

I whipped up the artwork in Canva – see below, which you are welcome to use and adapt as suits. Or design your own.

An adaptable template for a community advisory sign

Next I found a great local printer, and within a few days we had the signs in our hot little hands. We drilled holes in the corflute, grabbed some cable ties and a wee step-stool, and we were good to go.

Freshly printed corflutes ready to be installed.

This area of Meadowbank is a self-contained “peninsula” – there are no through-roads to anywhere else  and there are only about five or six roads running into it. So that’s where we focused on putting up our first signs, as well as near one of the schools and the kindy, for obvious reasons.

An annotated screenshot of AT’s speed reversal viewer map showing key locations

Probably the trickiest part was finding appropriate places to install our signs. We didn’t want to put them on the official road signs, so we attached them to handy power poles. One unexpected issue was that being such a lovely leafy green suburb, a few spots that would have been otherwise perfect were obscured by trees.

It took us a bit longer than we expected to put up our first eight signs, because as well as taking some time to find the best spots, we ended up having lots of chats with locals who fully supported what we were doing.

An advisory “Our community chooses 30” sign near a 50 speed sign.


What happens next?

We plan to leave the signs up for as long as needed. For now, the new Speed Rule has completely removed the option of 30kmh in urban residential areas, which is frankly just weird considering both the science and our community stance. So our signs are a placeholder, for as long as it takes, reminding everyone of what we know to be true.

In theory, under the new Speed Rule communities like Meadowbank could push Auckland Transport for a fresh consultation on an area-wide 40kmh. This would be safer than 50km/h, but not as safe as 30km/h. It would also mean resources spent on consultation, communication, and printing and installing new signs, just to confirm what we’ve already made clear, twice.

Alternatively, we can hope that a future government (or a minister with a more rational, locally-led approach) will give us back the freedom to choose 30km/h limits. That would be ideal. After all, Auckland Transport must have a warehouse somewhere full of 30 signs that could be swapped back in.

Would a potential 40kmh “bird in the hand” be better than waiting for a return to the evidence-based and community-preferred 30kmh in the future? I don’t know – but I do know that by firmly reminding everyone that we choose 30, we are doing our best to ensure some continuity of safety for our children. And that’s the most important thing.

Charmaine, with one of the original 30 signs: easily swapped back when rationality returns.


This post, like all our work, is brought to you by the Greater Auckland crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers and fans. If you’d like to support our work, you can join our circle of supporters here, or support us on Substack!

Share this

35 comments

  1. I originally wondered if AT should do this too. A sign saying something like “Government mandated speed limit: 50. AT recommended speed limit: 30”. It would obviously create a war, hard to know if that war is worthwhile or would just lead to AT getting less funding.

    1. Yes, they should. And I don’t think it would create a war. Rather, it could keep a lid on toxic petro-masculinity.

    2. In Oamaru area the wheelie bins have a speed limit sign on the sides. On rubbish day the streets are lined with bins displaying the speed. Do the same in other residential areas with 30 on the bins. At least one day a week would have these displayed.

  2. This is fantastic, Charmaine.

    I’ve seen signs in Hawkes Bay that I think are also advisory signs. They are actually identical to the official road signs, but use grey instead of red.

    So there are a few options. Very impressed to see you kicking it off for Tamaki Makaurau.

  3. This is great Charmaine, but still sad that making streets safer has become a community initiative as the authorities have abdicated their responsibilities.

  4. Could we include Ngapuhi Road, especially at the Benson Road intersection as heaps of Meadowbank Primary kids and parents congregate there before and after school. It’s bit of a rat run for drivers to get from lower parts Upland Road to Remuera Road.
    I’ve thought about some guerilla art on the road to slow drivers down. But I suspect AT would take a dim view of that.

  5. As a local resident, I really respect the effort and determination that’s gone into this campaign. It’s great to see people advocating for safer, more liveable streets.

    It is, however, hard to ignore the contradiction. In the 2023 election, 76% of voters in this electorate backed a candidate who supported raising speed limits, and 68% voted for parties that made that a central policy. Those choices directly enabled the very changes people are now opposing.

    People want slower speeds and safer streets for their area, while supporting national policies that remove those same protections elsewhere. There’s a real lack of localism in New Zealand politics and it shows on issues like this.

    Until we reconcile that disconnect between local preferences and national voting, we’ll keep seeing outcomes that don’t reflect what communities actually want.

    1. In America, they say that your average voter wants Democrat policies carried out by Donald Trump.

      Right here, people vote primarily on “brand” or on personal attraction rather than politics. People just hate “greenies” or “lefties” even though the policies they actually prefer are greenie or leftie ones.

      People keep thinking they can make up a candidate who will give off a Winston Peters vibe but with good politics, but it can’t happen.

    2. I get the feeling that if local speed limits were set by a local council (not government or super city), most areas in Auckland would have the lower speed limits.
      People want lower speed limits in their street, but not every other street.
      Probably the opposite to density.

    3. And which electorate would that be and do you have any evidence for your claims?

      And if you want to talk about mandates and Electoral promises, it’s a bit hard to miss Nationals promises to “return democracy to local councils”…

      1. Yes, unfortunately:

        Tamaki electorate results for 2023, which Meadowbank is part of
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C4%81maki_(New_Zealand_electorate)#2023_election

        National pledge pre election, endorsed by ACT
        https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/498653/election-2023-national-promises-to-end-new-speed-limit-reductions

        Coalition agreement pledging to reverse speed limit reductions
        https://www.thepost.co.nz/politics/350118150/national-act-coalition-agreement-full

        My point is not that this innitiative is a bad idea, it’s that when a party seeking election says we’re going to set speed limits on local roads, then we better believe that’s what they’re going to do, regardless of other noise about localism or local democracy.

        1. There is no evidence in what you provided to support the idea that people voted for any candidate because of the speed limit changes.

          Very few people are single issue voters. Although we do see some of them lurking around here complaining about how lower speed limits emasculated them.

          It’s rather odd that you believe the only electoral promises we should trust in are those regarding speed limits. Care to explain?

      1. So you are against pedestrians crossing the road? How typical of petrol huffing cagers.

        I once saw a parent who lived directly across from the school gates use their car to pick up their kid and make the 20-30 metre journey back home. I guess that’s what you carbrains want, isn’t it.

  6. Did anyone see Rodney Local Board Member and ‘Road Safety Campaigner’ Geoff Upson on TVNZ, Monday morning?

    He was advising the NZ public about the ‘sweet spot’ of 80-90kph for hitting a speed bump or table.

    They changed the signs, but concrete speaks louder. Now they are coming after the humps to finish the job.

  7. Meadowbank is a prime example of where 30 km/h is clearly the right speed limit. For as long as this daft Setting of Speed Limits Rules persists, advisory signs can do what a mandatory limit isn’t allowed to. “30 SAFE SPEED” is all the message that is really necessary, but I do like “Our community chooses” – honest to local democracy.

  8. I once caught a train with a man who claimed he was in sign design, a bachelor, and very wealthy. I can understand why with the stupidity of the current Wellington silly mans in suits brigade.

    Thirty is perfect, cars can actually move at this speed, as can bikes, and running persons. Why do the machines still take precedence over us humans?

    Are the drivers of cars not human also?

    Those metallic boxes with a few windows and four wheels, suicide machines as The Boss called them. Certainly loneliness machines.

    I previously would become upset about persons in cars, but now I just feel sorry for them. So cut off from society, such an antisocial method of travel, not to mention climate damaging and generally unhealthy.

    bah humbug

      1. Is that you Mount Colon?

        The idiocy of this comment matches up with your well established ignorance.

        You really should feel more ashamed of displaying such a childish understanding of the world in public.

        Now, either learn the rules around operating your phallic substitute or hand back your licence.

  9. Drive down your home local street at 30 km/h. You can relax, feel everyone will be safe and even stop, roll down your window and talk to passing neighbours.

  10. Whilst I fully support the desire to keep the safer 30km/h speed limits and I disgusted by this government’s approach to most transport policy I cant get behind this cavalier attitude that if I don’t like something I should just put up my own traffic signs.
    Charmaine has committed a couple of offences here and this article is a guilty pleasure. It is an offence under s357 of the Local Government Act 1974 and the Auckland Activities in the Road Corridor Bylaw 2024 to place an unauthorised encroachment in the road and an offence under s13 of the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 to put up traffic signs (yes even advisory ones) without approval from the road controlling authority.
    Yes most readers of this blog would agree with the safer speed but if we say it is OK for Charmaine to put up the signs that she likes then what is to stop someone else putting up signs that they like advising people to go 80 in the 50 zone?

    1. Get a grip. While the authorities continue to willfully ignore the many illegal actions drivers and businesses undertake in the road corridor, your comment is simply showing a lack of judgement or awareness of relative risks to people and society.

      Focus on what matters.

      1. Quite. Also these are not road signs, or even attached to the road sign poles. They are community notices, and they’ve been well received by local residents.

      2. Indeed.

        You can smell the petrol on his breath when they had their little rant about legality / illegality.

    2. How could ziptied signs on power poles qualify as “an unauthorised encroachment in the road”?

      I pictured building your own traffic island or kerb buildout, perhaps.

  11. And you’re wrong, very very wrong.

    Hand back your license and please check the passenger cabin to see if exhaust fumes are causing your mental distress.

    Did the comment about people like you feeling emasculated hit too close? Diddum-woos you absolute child.

  12. Wow, what a great community response to the foolhardy changes to local road speeds. We live in Meadowbank and cycle/walk everywhere and lower speeds allow us to feel safer on the road. Kia kaha

  13. Very pleased at the creative action on speed limits and also t he recycling hub at St Chads. Could this be expanded to include a collection point for small used batteries?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *