One area that we have been particularly unimpressed on over the last three years has been the complete lack of any new bus lanes – or even just bus priority measures – over the last three years. In fact bus lanes have actually been removed as the Remuera Rd bus lane was downgraded to a T3 lane.
There are a couple of key reasons for us to be annoyed at this lack of action. Bus lanes can perform an incredibly important function as they can:
- Speed up trips by allowing buses to avoid congestion and thus make PT more attractive (increases PT patronage).
- Increase the amount of people able to move through a specific road corridor thus making better use of our roading infrastructure.
- Reduce ongoing operating costs and therefore reduce the amount of subsidy needed to run services.
I suspect the first two points should be fairly straightforward so I just want to expand on the last one a little bit. My understanding is that most buses in Auckland have an average travel speed of about 20 km per hour. I say most because buses that can use good bus infrastructure (Northern busway buses & roads with existing bus lanes) are able to travel considerably faster – perhaps up to twice as fast – thanks to the infrastructure. What that means is that where in the past a bus might have only been able to do one run during the morning peak they could now do two so. That means we can get one of the following outcomes:
- Less buses and therefore expenditure is needed to maintain the same level of service meaning we can reduce the amount of funding needed and therefore improve cost recovery.
- Use the freed up budget to run more buses, increasing the attractiveness of services and therefore improving cost recovery.
The key point is that the investment in the infrastructure can have huge impacts on operational expenditure. This is similar to what Stu talked about earlier this week. The one downside to bus lanes is that they are often unpopular with motorists, especially those who feel they have an entitlement to as much asphalt as possible (and then some). Those noisy motorists tend to quickly gain the attention of councillors meaning we often see any proposed projects quickly killed off to appease the road gods. The separation of the political aspects of transport  from the operational ones was meant to be one of the key reasons for setting up  Auckland Transport however more and more it appears they are simply too scared to make the changes necessary.
It is this situation that led us to the tweet below.
Remember last election when the stupid issue distracting everyone was bus lanes enforcement? 3 years later not a single metre of bus lane.
— Greater Auckland (@GreaterAKL) October 3, 2013
The tweet was quickly picked up on by the herald who seem desperate to find anything to beat up the council up over
Len Brown has not built a single metre of bus lane in his first term as mayor of the Super City.
Mr Brown, who says fixing public transport, including better bus services, is his top priority, has splurged $770 million on public transport and $1.2 billion on roads and footpaths in the past three years.
But not a cent has gone on new lanes to improve bus services, which have drawn criticism and seen a fall of 2.9 per cent in patronage over the past year, from 55.1 million bus trips to 53.5 million.
Auckland Transport yesterday confirmed a tweet on the Auckland Transport Blog that after the “stupid” 2010 election distraction of bus-lane enforcement, not one had been built.
An Auckland Transport spokesman said the main change on bus lanes was allowing cars with three or more passengers to use the 5km Remuera Rd bus lane.
He said a lot of work had been done on signage and marking of bus lanes to make things clearer for motorists after the 2010 issues.
Bus priority work continued on major projects such as Dominion Rd and Ameti in southeast Auckland and a major revamp of bus services, the spokesman said.
Yes work is progressing on Dominion Rd which should upgrade the existing bus lanes to a near busway status and the first tentative parts of AMETI have started but most of the bus lanes on that project aren’t going to come into use for many many years. Working on signage appears to have been the only really visible change on this list of completed tasks from this AT board paper at the beginning of the year on the topic.
Following the release of The Bus and Transit Lane Review: Planning and Implementation Model for Auckland, July 2011, AT has made significant advances in implementing the associated action plan. This report provides an update on the work streams outlined in the action plan.
The following key milestones have been completed:
- Formation of the bus and transit lane steering group;
- Region wide review of effectiveness of priority bus and transit lanes;
- Change of Remuera Road bus lane to a T3 lane;
- Completion of a productivity analysis for all bus and transit lanes in the region;
- Development of an on-going productivity analysis programme;
- Implementation of trial bus and transit lane signage and marking improvement measures;
- Completion of Grafton Bridge bus lane upgrade measures – signage and road markings
- Audit of Onewa Road T3 lane and implementation of measures to allow enforcement.
The following tasks are still outstanding:
- Audit of all existing bus and transit lanes;
- Roll out of education campaigns in support of new bus and transit lane signage;
- Including bus and transit lane changes in the New Zealand Road Code.
The planning and implementation model mentioned can be found here and it looked at how AT would assess potential bus lanes in the future. It also considered that on some routes where there are less buses but where we want to provide improvements that T2/3 lanes might be more appropriate and I agree. While I’m not always a huge fan of T2/3 I do think it creates a useful stepping stone on the way to a full bus lanes and so can provide many of the benefits of a dedicated lane without as much negative reaction from drivers.
So which routes should AT really rolling T2/3 lanes or bus lanes out to? Well really they should be on roads with a frequent bus route and the proposed new bus network provides a blueprint for just that.
So come on AT, you need to get some more bus lanes, or at least some T2/3 rolled out to help support the bus network.
Note: Mayoral Candiatate John Palino predictably picked up on the herald article and used it to complain about Len Brown however was silent when asked if he would actually do anything about it.
@johnpalino Will you? if so on what roads? what are thoughts on T2/3?
— Greater Auckland (@GreaterAKL) October 7, 2013
I think the problem is that Auckland Transport have made it too hard for themselves to introduce bus lanes. It seems like all the planned bus lanes are part of huge projects – perhaps to always ensure no road capacity can be lost . This ignores the beauty of bus lanes being that they just need some signs and green paint and you have a vastly better PT route.
They need to be planning bus lanes on Manukau Rd as part of the western ring route, and have them ready to open the second the motorway bypass is completed.
Every time I drive down it, I’m staggered that there aren’t already bus lanes on Manukau Rd.
Yes, yes and more yes.
Not sure why “Western Ring Route” related, or even, why wait for that?
Because we have Gerry Brownlee as MoT, we won’t be allowed to ‘block this critical route with buslanes’. The council would be sacked.
Starnius, Manukau Rd is the officially signposted route between the city and the airport and carries a lot of traffic between SH1 and SH20. The level of traffic is predicted to drop considerably once the motorway to motorway link at waterview is opened, which is the opportune time to implement bus lanes before the traffic creeps up again.
Agree 100% Fred the current focus is tack on per project and maintain level of car service, not change the network wide allocation of what we have for each mode of travel. You can change the mode preference to road space overnight via roadmarking. If it was planned smart from an entire network point of view (reviewing high frequency locations) you could really get all modes (review main routes all modes) going citywide fast. If you promoted with a 40% off-peak discount sametime would create a major patronage spike and change the whole picture and probably knock congestion over so not even car mode notices it has one lane missing.
Not so much ‘road gods’ as car god, or, more precisely, the god of single occupant private motor vehicles. In accordance with government diktat, AT and NZTA both worship at that particular shrine.
That post was depressing for a number of reasons, mainly the way social media is used as a tool for manipulation rather than information but also because it highlights a severe lack of progress in an area that has already proved to have immense value. I’m not surprised Palino didn’t respond – given his lack of actual policy nous on transport, he probably thought the tweet was a reference to ‘The Terminator’.
hilarious.
Further problem with Palino is that his “anointed” Deputy Mayor comes from the very Ward that got the Remurea Road buslane dropped to T2(?) and is not the biggest fan of mass transit…
John Palino was at an event I attended on the weekend and he seems like a very genuine and nice guy. However, he cant just be nagative all the time and attack Len. Well he can but I dont think that is enough to be a leader.
Other than the second CBD idea, I havent really seen one positive, concrete piece of policy from him. Just vague things like “lower rates” or “make Council accountable”. Empty platitudes.
Absolutely agree !
Agreed, he has been asked repeatedly on fb for specific things and refuses to give anything.
I know it’s already been posted about here by Matt L, but it’s immensely frustrating to have the election descend into a ‘cut the berms’ debate, rather than one where candidates are critiqued based on their policies – or lack thereof. That said, it’s encouraging that there’s places like this where candidates’ policies are picked apart and analysed – Gen Zero also deserve credit for attempting to shed light in that respect. I just wish the majority of people who are going to vote in the local body elections were the sort of people who would look for independent analysis on the blogosphere, rather than the sort of barely-web-literate baby boomers that read the Herald and get their knickers in a twist over mowing a tiny piece of grass.
As an aside – I’d be very interested to see the number of people aged 18-27 that turn up to vote.
Agree Konrad. Gen Zero give me hope for the future of NZ. I have been involved personally with them and they are a really nice bunch of young people who are politically savvy and walk the talk.
I would also like to see a breakdown of the youth vote. I believe organisations like Gen Zero may have helped get more young people voting. We all know they should as the decisions made now will affect them much more than the Baby Boomers and I dont think the direction now is one most youth agrees with.
Onewa Road had a full plan for a T3/Buslane in the afternoon peak hours that went to public consultation. For some reason this was turned down and no follow up l=plan seems to have been developed.
Onewa Road supports all of Birkenhead/Birkdale/Beachhave, Glenfield, and Northcote.
Very disappointing.
yes Onewa Rd westbound in PM peak seems to be a prime contender for bus/HOV lane.
The reason they did not push through with the T3/Bus Lane on Onewa Rd because the people on the side roads would be affected by people parking on side streets
That is a shame. I thought arterial roads were for moving various transport modes the smartest way possible. And taking that a step further doesn’t a vehicle holding 50 override a car holding 1?. Isn’t parking on a side street safer anyway?
Then counter that with permits like the Herne Bay trial or some other measure; dont scrap the plan completely!
The houses in that area should be on notice that there will be a HOV lane their and that street parking will be effected. Longer term, they should be 24/7 clearways, not just in peak hour too. Otherwise, a few people living along a 2km stretch of road are holding a massive catchment to ransom.
“The reason they did not push through with the T3/Bus Lane on Onewa Rd because the people on the side roads would be affected by people parking on side streets”
So several DECADES of mandatory off-street minimum parking requirements, and we still treat on-street parking as if it can’t be removed? Seems to me that this means BOTH policies have failed us, then. Funny how one policy is largely still being retained though, while the other (improving PT) gets shunted to “too hard”.
But that is a positive effect. Parked cars slow traffic making streets safer.
Exactly. It is counter intuitive but narrower roads are actually safer for active modes and parked cars are one way to achieve that.
The Dutch are narrowing roads in 1960s style auto oriented developments to make them more cycle friendly by widening footpaths but not removing any parking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q57sa7tjSNk&feature=player_embedded
Wide roads only encourage motorists to live out their petrol head fantasies. They arent safer for anyone.
Te Atatu Road is getting widened and having many millions spent on it – zero bus lanes. Not even a T2 lane.
They mention Dominion Road but don’t mention that the bus lane will still only exist in rush hour, despite the fact that the busiest time on Dominion Road is around midday on Saturday and Sunday. Dominion Road really needs bus lanes 7am to 7pm 7 days, but of course shop owners must have people parking right outside their shop.
I think they do need to put more thought into bus lanes – for example there is one up Khyber Pass that seems to cause more delays for both buses and cars than if it wasn’t there. Buses have to move from the left hand bus lane to the right turn lane into Park Road, but cars are all crammed into the middle lane and don’t want to let the buses in. When buses and cars shared both lanes there seemed to be much less traffic and it was quicker for everyone.
I guess AT shouldn’t be adding new bus lanes until they have finished planning the new network.
likewise the bus lanes on Park Road are ignored when it is busy which is a good thing as if all the cars tried to cram into the car lane, no buses (or cars) would get through on a phase of lights.
That doesn’t necessarily mean it should be removed, could it be redesigned better.
I think the new network is pretty much finished planning
A bus right turn arrow from the bus lane on Khyber Pass into Park Road would make a lot of sense.
The left turn bus lane from Park Road into Khyber Pass is just really weird – it shouldn’t be shared with cars, they should have their own lane.
The road can only hold so many lanes though.
Park Road crossing Carlton Gore Road going toward Newmarket should allow Buses to go straight through from the left turn lane.
They put in bus lanes but then dont appear to put in a comprehesive, start to finish solution.
There are three lanes on Park Road, though. You could easily have:
1. Left-turning buses
2. Left and straight ahead general traffic
3. Right-turning traffic
Which would have the nice side effect of only having one straight-ahead traffic lane, so you could get rid of that stubby couple of metres of two-laning on Mountain Road and widen the footpath outside 269 Khyber Pass.
But would your lane 2 result in more traffic backed up towards the hospital meaning buses couldn’t get to their bus lane?
Do we need a bus lane from the hospital (there is no need for car parks there as there are plenty of parks in the domain (or the hopsital carpark)? BOOM – an easy 100m Lenny could have done right there with a can of green paint and a sign.
Yeah, that’d help, plus your idea of buses being able to go straight from the left-turn lane (maybe with an advance signal of a few seconds).
Actually, I think we should rip all the parking out of the domain, except for the underground bit at the museum, and all of the roads removed or closed to public traffic – service vehicles could still get in. Some of that parking would be replaced with angle parking on the north side of the street for Carlton Gore (which probably wouldn’t even need widening) and George/Titoki Streets (which would, but it would be much less space than would be freed further within the domain).
The whole Upper Symonds/New North/Newton area seems to be a sitter for bus lanes. Usually see several buses in one block at peak times, must be far more people on buses than cars. The thing with this part is that there are waaay too many traffic lanes, so should be easy to full-time bus lanes without complaints.
There are peak time clearways on New North Road. I have wondered for ages why they can’t just be bus lanes. Then the buses might actually be on time occasionally.
The utter cheek of the Herald is something to behold. In the same way as they work a fury in excitable members of the community over berm-mowing, they were the spearheads of a campaign of complaint against bus-lanes.
Instead of informing the community with even examination of the issues, the pages of New Zealand’s oldest newspaper are used to create controversies and slow progress.
To be fair its not just the Herald. Did you watch Campbell Live yesterday? Actually quite amusing watching it.
To get full effect of the rapid high frequency bus network it think it needs to be hit in one go citywide fully planned or the lanes just won’t warrant the 24/7 utilisation . Bus Network and Fares improved then come the passengers..hoards of them. Some solutions on the side roads…if this is the current show stopper need more attention. Resident permits and maybe some short stay 30min only provided 0n the first 45m back (say 10m clear and 35m (5 x 7m allowing gap on left hand side as nose in off arterial road)parking on all side roads close to the arterials where practicable…not sure but must be some good solutions around this not just giving up.
just now got an email that the PT plan has been adopted by the AT Board, copies available by 21 October
Palino is a joke. He says he will cut spending but keeps making promises to increase spending. Unless he is promising to build bus lanes, then why the heck is he brining it up.
He’s not planning on building any that’s why, and the Generation Zero acre card showed he didn’t really care about PT. He’s also opposed to the CRL and with Cameron Brewer as his deputy, someone who again has never come up with any plan but rather always disagreed with anything Len Brown proposed. With those two in power you can safely say goodbye to any of the many projects in the pipeline that involve change the urban environment to improve it for non-car drivers, anything impinging on cars will be swiftly cancelled.
There are some very short buslanes on Glenfield Road that have come in the last 18 months, probably 100m all up.
Agreed, but if we count crumbs as if they are valuable, we will continue to get crumbs…
True. I would prefer to call the advance bus boxes.
That’s an interesting comparison. Like cycle advance boxes. Better than nothing, yet still almost nothing.
Cycle boxes are far better than nothing though because they at least show drivers that I should be out in the middle of the lane at lights.
I refuse to use advance cycle boxes. It always feels like I’m lining up in front of a firing squad.
I tend to use them in the inner city, I feel cars should realise that if they come into the inner city then time to realise that things are different and people and cyclists are there – if you don’t like stick to Botany Downs. But otherwise I tend to agree, they’re not relaxing to use especially when you know the cars behind you are basically revving to push past you.
cycle boxes are great on a motorbike!
At least they give you the option of using them. Sitting at the head of traffic queue without them is terifying, no matter how central a position you take some muppet still tries to pull up even.
I bet if the current mayor were right-leaning, he/she would get 100% of the blame for lack of bus priority, which began at the same time he/she came to power 🙂
Ideology blinds!
I have to agree. Right wing politicians seem to be put to a much higher standard than lefties. Heck, Len Brown isn’t even mentioned in this post!
You seem to be suggesting that we are being ideological and protecting the person you think we support. If that were the case, we wouldn’t have brought up the issue at all.
I should add. I harassed Len personally about this very issue a few days ago, before it was in the herald
I’m pleased no new bus lanes have gone in. They play into the same paradigms as more roads and more cars – plus they often simply do not work very well. Any stretch of road with any kind of desire to be a social space has no chance once bus lanes are installed. We need smarter thinking that what they offer, not more attempts to shift more tons of motorised metal.
But we have to move lots of people, that is the reality of a city. Buslanes do that better than vehicle lanes. If we want to talk about placemaking in town centres then we can, but even that would not stop bus lanes, one only needs to briefly slow all traffic including buses to see a vast improvement, which AT have started to do.
Yep placemaking is exactly what we should be talking about – once you live somewhere that has a sense of place & good local facilities/community/resources the urge to go other places is greatly diminished. Auckland is at a tipping point where if we don’t start rolling back the structural problems we will probably be forever a car-dominant city cf. the latest housing announcements look like more gormless suburb building.
I was told by a senior person at a bus company Auckland bus speeds were
9km/h in the CBD
14km/h in inner suburbs
28km/h for “long haul”
When Auckland Transport was set up there was heavy redundancies among bus lane planners, though not so much apparently among cycling and rail planners.. It was obvious then that the paradigm was “buses aren’t sexy” (repeat n times).
Well, there obviously aren’t many cycling planners left either, because:
http://caa.org.nz/auckland-transport/barely-10-km-of-new-cycle-facilities-built-last-year/