The discussion about Danish architect/urban designer Jan Gehl that resulted from my blog post the other day got me thinking about how we could give effect to his plea to “halve asphalt in the CBD in the next 10 years”. Some changes that he specified seem obvious: pedestrianising parts of Quay Street and narrowing Queen Street (although until we have built the CBD rail tunnel I’d actually probably leave Queen Street as is but turn two of the lanes into bus lanes), but what about beyond that?
Well for a start I would hope that we look at extending the network of shared streets that Auckland City Council is about to embark upon creating. Last year I had a bit of a think about how we could extend that network, and came up with the following map (red being currently proposed shared streets, green being the immediate next stage and blue being a third somewhat longer term stage): Most of the streets I’ve highlighted are little backstreets that don’t carry much vehicle-traffic and would therefore be perfect for conversion to a more pedestrian-friendly feel. An obvious problem with this plan is how much it might cost, as Auckland City Council’s current shared streets project do seem very expensive indeed. Hopefully, once the first few have proven to be successes we can work out ways to do future shared spaces in a more low-key and inexpensive way.
However, in my opinion simply focusing on the little side-streets doesn’t necessarily go far enough to make the CBD a more people-friendly area. There are a significant parts of the CBD that are utterly hostile to pedestrians, and if we really do want to give effect to Jan Gehl’s vision for Auckland (and in my opinion we absolutely should want that as it would create a far nicer CBD to live, work, do business and generally ‘be’ in) we need to focus on improving those areas.
One such example is the corner of Mayoral Drive, Cook Street and Vincent Street. As shown in the photo below, it’s a pretty massive intersection right next to Auckland’s Civic Heart, and in its current form simply reinforces the “car is king” perception that I think we need to do away with: Five lanes of high-speed traffic, huge “free-turn” slip lanes that cars can just barrel through, no interface between the street and the Aotea Centre (that big white blimp to the left of screen), this corner of the city almost couldn’t be worse. If the intersection was narrowed up a lot, I actually imagine the council would find they had enough space to build something quite useful, particularly on the Aotea Centre corner, and reconnect the newly narrowed (and therefore, critically, slower) street with its surrounding environment.
Another candidate ripe for some “road removal” is Pitt Street in the ‘upper CBD’. It is sometimes joked that Pitt Street is as wide as it is long, which is not quite true – but does reflect the fact that the road is completely unnecessarily wide at six lanes. This is shown in the photo below:
Now I assume Pitt Street is so wide because back in the days before spaghetti junction was finished and you could travel through Auckland on state highway 1 without exiting the motorway, this was effectively the main road through the city. In fact, I imagine it probably was state highway 1 at one point in the past. But when it was bypassed, instead of “locking in” the benefits of the new bypass the road was simply left unnecessarily wide – leading to drivers speeding along it and a wholly unpleasant place for pedestrians. Some buses use Pitt Street, so I’d probably narrow it down to a single general lane and a single bus lane in each direction. The other space could be used for nicer, wider footpaths.
(There’s a lesson here actually, to ensure that you lock in the benefits of new roads that take traffic away from local streets. I hope that lesson is learned with Wiri Station Road in Manukau City.)
A third obvious piece of road to narrow/remove would be the Lower Hobson Street viaduct. I actually remember when this was being built, and it is perhaps one of the most horrible pieces of roading infrastructure in the entire CBD.My word, what idiot thought that was a good idea? With Quay Street pedestrianised, the need for this horrible piece of infrastructure would disappear, and gloriously the whole thing could be removed. I sincerely hope that we never think of building such horrible things again.
Any other roads in the CBD that could be removed/narrowed/altered to become more people friendly and to help create a truly world-class central city?
One key thing you failed to mention is that if all these roads were reduced in size, it would allow for the building of some great ‘Copenhagen-style’ cycle lanes that are segregated from traffic and strongly encourage cycling for short city trips, thus reducing the need for the cars even further! If you noticed, the bicycle was an important part of Jan Gehl’s plan for a livable city, but this will only happen if we provide infrastructure that is perceived as safe by potential cyclists.
Absolutely. I guess my point is that if we narrow streets down, and slow traffic down, the city is a nicer place for everyone – most particularly cyclists. There are some important cycling improvement projects in and around the CBD that seem to be progressing (if slowly). Where do you think better cycle lanes would work best?
Why can’t we block off Queen Street from Mayoral Drive to Wellesley Street to all traffic, except maybe buses and have the whole area a boulevard. It would encompass the Town Hall, Aotea Square, The Civic,Imax, the Edge and the Library and Art Gallery are not far away and Albert Park just up the hill. There is a natural loop around the area of Mayoral Drive and Wellesley Street.
Auckland desperately needs a heart for Aucklanders to come back too. As an ordinary Aucklander I’ve been to Auckland twice in the last two years and it wasn’t a great experience. The only place I like is the Viaduct and that’s tiny. With all the controversy around the downtown development, with the whole thing stretching years into the future, this development uptown would be relatively inexpensive surely? Nothing would have to be built, although it would be nice to have some trees brought in and cafes etc.
How about it?
I do like the idea of blocking off bits of Queen Street, although remember there are a great number of buses that go along Queen Street so you’d need to consider where they’d be diverted to.
Albert Street.
Princes Street and Bowen Ave to increase park access and Beresford Square as part of the K Road station development. I actually think that Downtown carpark would make an excellant location for the conference centre: it’s a large title; Copthorne are looking to redevlop so you could integrate that into the plans; it is close to transport; close to the waterfront; close to hotels, restaurants, cafes etc. You could also combine it with tearing down the Hobson Street ramp and creating a square out front and developing the back of the viaduct. Quay Street would become a dead end street that would provide access only for the hotels viaduct etc. with only the new waterfront trams passing through and across Te Wero Bridge to Wynyard Quarter. *Sigh* dreams are free.
“My word, what idiot thought that was a good idea?”
I thought you LOVED it as a kid 😉
Actually, we ARE proposing more such things (just look at the idea to have a bridge over to North Shore at Wynyard Quarter, which would require massive approach viaducts or ramps, or the grade-separated interchange (the motorway interchange that dare not speak ist name) planned at Pakuranga Highway / Ti Rakau Road).
Talking of the city, don’t forget Gehl’s comments about closing or significant narrowing down of Quay Street and Customs Street, to reconnect the CBD to the waterfront.
I probably did love it as a kid Max, but then I also thought spaghetti junction was the coolest thing in the whole wide world.
I did mention the pedestrianisation of Quay Street. I think Customs Street can stay roughly as is, just with bus lanes added along its length in both directions.
On a more stategic level, it would be good to think about the entire western half of the CBD as something other than merely a conduit for the SH1 and N’western motorways. Nelson, Hobson, Cook and Union are dead zones. Shared spaces are nice (and you’re right, very expensive), but we need to reconsider this need for car-dominant “corridors” within the whole of the CBD. Even if it means patiently dismissing NZTA’s doomsday prattling.
I agree render Quay St pedestrian (probably with a pair of narrow lanes for buses/trams) and maintain Customs St as the main vehicular crosstown route. Then get rid of the now useless Hobson viaduct and make lower Hobson St a simple two lane two-way road for access to Princess wharf, the Copthorne Hotel and the eastern part of the viaduct.
Lower Albert could likewise bus a two lane bus only street (with provision for local access as required), while people would have to be allowed to drive in front of the CPO to access the ferry wharves (shouldn’t be any risk of clogging this with traffic as the wharf would be the only place accessible).
The idea would be to make Customs the through route and make everything north of there pedestrian and bus only, with limited provision for local access to properties primarily by taking a parallel st from Customs. This would mean probably closing Quay St to private vehicles from the intersection with Tangihua St and the port entrance.
Also as admin has discussed before, turning Nelson and Hobson into two way streets would be a major benefit for that part of the city.
I would suggest converting them into boulevards with trees up both sides (filling in the ones that are already there) and a row of trees in a central median. Three lanes each way (two general lanes and one narrower parking/peak flow lane) would still match the capacity coming off the motorway and hopefully keep the road lobby happy.
They could also look at putting a planted/paved median right along Mayoral Drive to help people cross easily and keep the ‘racetrack’ feel of the street to a minimum. As far as I can tell there are no driveways coming off this street, so there is no need for a flush median except for taxi drivers to do dodgy U-turns on.
“Also as admin has discussed before, turning Nelson and Hobson into two way streets would be a major benefit for that part of the city.”
Gehl has mentioned this as well.
I think we need to have wider footpaths and cycle lanes along Nelson and Hobson too. “Just” turning them into two-way streets with a tree median would still be a lost opportunity. These are some of the most densely settled parts of town (would be interesting to get a density map that breaks it down to a street level) and to basically have it as a hostile zone for peds is just disregard for one’s residents.
Hmmmm… I might have to have a look at some designs for these streets.
I think all the port bound trucks should be banned from Beach Road and Tangiahua St. Not too much of a detour to send them down Strand and Quay, most go that way anyway.
This would much improve the streetscape here, looking a bit shabby at the moment.
Also if you need a density map at meshblock level I’ve got one for the 2006 census in Google Earth format.
Will upload it to the web somehow and post the link later.
That would be handy Luke thanks. Meshblocks are useful because they really show local variations.
Definitely make Nelson and Hobson streets two way, also I think Ponsonby Road had its parking turned into pay & display and the road was reduced to one way in each direction plus bus lanes.
I’m not sure why we have to have bus lanes in Quay St at all if its going to be pedestrianised. They would run along Customs St and thats only one block north. Not exactly a postcode away.
And of course, we might have a tram running down there in future, ideally.
Taxis, couriers and hotel shuttles – sure. But let’s go the whole hog and make it fully pedestrianised from Britomart Place to the Viaduct. What a fantstic waterfront boulevard that would be.
After that: Queen St (though I’d allow one lane each side for buses, taxis, couriers etc)
I was thinking about this last night actually. Firstly I would block off Queen St between Victoria and Wellesley St and then between Victoria and Wyndham St. I thought about blocking off Wyndham and Shortland Sts but I can see that causing a huge fuss so I thought you could link the two with a short stint down Queen St, it would be narrowed to 1 lane each way which means pedestrians still gain the car parking spaces and one traffic lane which still be quite good. Obviously the small lanes in between the major roads are prime candidates for shared spaces or full pedestrianisation.
As for Quay St, I think full pedestrianisation between Gore St and the Viaduct with just local access for the Copthorne etc. Between Gore St and Tangihua St it should just be one lane each way, the purpose of which is to serve a cruise terminal/conference centre on Captain Cook Wharf as buses, taxi’s, police, service trucks etc will need access, again with the road not needing to be as big it will allow much bigger footpaths and will be easier to cross.
Of course one thing that does need to be considered in all of this is emergency services, they will need easy access to all areas but I’m sure this is something that can be solved when the spaces are being implemented.
I think we should take some inspiration from Brisbane’s Queen St. They have put the busway/bus depot under it and above ground is just for pedestrians. There are now great restraunts in the centre of the street and room for small open air concerts and events. Makes a great CBD. I think such a conversion would be very popular here in Auckland. The busses could enter underground from the intersection at Mayoral drive southbound and another side entrance for north bound. My 2cents.
I don’t really know if the Brisbane underground bus station is really what we should be aiming to emulate, although something will need to be done in the longer term to fix the problem if having so many buses in the CBD. I’m actually thinking the solution will be to have a lot more bus routes linking into train stations rather than running all the way to the CBD.
Full pedstrianisation of Quay Street between Gore Street or Tangihua Street and the Viaduct definitely seems the best option.
Now, slightly off topic but still to do with pedestrianiasation.
Who the hell designed the Beach Rd/Tangihua St intersection? To use as a pedestrian it has to be the worst designed intersection in the city. The most major, regular source of pedestrians (Quay St Foodtown) doesn’t have a direct link with the major bus stop on Anzac Ave. To get to it you’ve either got to cross Tangihua St, then Beach Rd (two sets of lights and an extra 50m) or walk past the bottom of Anzac, cross at the light there, then cross again over Anzac Ave (again two long sets of lights and an extra 30m).
Basically there needs to be some form of crossing from the Foodtown side of Tangihua directly across Beach instead of the ludicrous diversion that’s there now.
Good point. You should email Auckland City Council with your concerns – I know they fixed up the Nuffield Street & Remuera Road intersection after a number of complaints about how poorly it provided for pedestrians.
O’Connel street and Kitchen Street South are also being done next as shared spaces. A further street that could do with narrowing down is Shortland Street and Emily Place.
I also reckon we can two way Hobson and Nelson, sell 4 of the 5 council owned parking garages or turn two of them into public squares…
I think selling the land the council parking buildings on makes sense, but selling the buildings themselves as a going concern isn’t a good idea, it’s better if the council makes money off people parking in the city not the private sector. I think we should look to up the prices and renovate the ground floors so they seem less like parking garages.
I meant sell them as empty lots…
Or redevelop them and then sell. It wouldn’t make much business sense to sell as empty lots I wouldn’t think.
Downtown carpark would make an awesome location for the convention centre.
Jan also mentioned that the council should look to regularly close off streets on weekends – this will show people the benefits of having the street car free and help reach the critical mass needed for a permanent closure. We should start doing this on Queen street and Quay Street in the weekends, I’d also like to see K’Rd closed on the weekends too and in the longterm having it substantially narrowed.
I definitely agree on that, and it should be relatively easy to do. Imagine if the council just decided to say “right, next Sunday we’re closing off Queen Street for the day, we’ve got a whole pile of chairs in, just come down and chill out and have some fun.”
It’d be great (though obviously even better if it wasn’t so damn cold at the moment).
Regarding re-developing the carparks – I’m not so sure the new Council will have the mandate to do tht anymore. It hasn’t really been discussed anywhere but Hide made a lot of noise about restricting the Council to its (what he thinks) core activities i.e. poos, water and roads. I’m not sure what he ended up putting into the SuperCity Bill but I also heard him saying on occasion property development shouldn’t be something the council does, an example of something he would likely oppose is Britomart, so it remains to be seen what will be possible.
Yeah sounds like privatise the profits and socialise the losses is back again.
“Good point. You should email Auckland City Council with your concerns – I know they fixed up the Nuffield Street & Remuera Road intersection after a number of complaints about how poorly it provided for pedestrians.”
I understand though it was a councillor getting pissed off at having to walk three crossings to get to Nuffield Street after the opening event for the station. Which goes to show that we need our elected representative actually using the same form of transport to get some action. Oh, what would I give for a mayor who actually cycles to work!
“Regarding re-developing the carparks – I’m not so sure the new Council will have the mandate to do tht anymore. ”
RTC, Auckland Council can still do pretty much do that, as per my understanding. To prevent them from doing that Hide would have to pass a couple new laws – he has mooted that kind of change, but as far as I know, been rebuffed.
Also, he can huff and puff, these car parks are in Council ownership now, and would be one of the few assets I would support Council selling off – IF two conditions are met: a) They wait until the land prices recover and b) they stipulate that the future use CANNOT be for car parking.
Max, I was there for the opening of Newmarket station and it was quite hilarious watching all the dignitaries taking the long way around the intersection.
The changes to the Local Government Act, in terms of “core activities” have been watered down from what Rodney really wanted. Councils will just be required to put “particular emphasis” on core activities, rather than needing to hold referenda every time they wanted to do something non-core, as was Rodney’s crazy earlier idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/nyregion/13sheridan.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
Plan to Remove Bronx Expressway Gains Traction