This is a guest post by Darren Davis. It originally appeared on his excellent blog, Adventures in Transitland, which we encourage you to check out. It is shared by kind permission.


In a recent blog post, I outlined the implications of the 2024-2027 Rail Network Investment Plan for Aotearoa/ New Zealand’s rail network. It made for sobering reading, and I recommend you read this first, if you haven’t already, as it sets the context for this post.

This piece looked forward with some trepidation while this post is a summary of the current state of play across the motu, from Te Tai Tokerau/ Northland to the sometimes forgotten Te Wai Pounamu/ South Island.

Te Tai Tokerau/ Northland – Marsden Point Rail Link

The Rail Network Investment Programme provides $65 million in funding for a detailed engineering design for the Marsden Point rail link. This is a planned 19 kilometre spur designated in 2012 off the North Auckland line at Oakleigh to Northport at Marsden Point, one of the only non-rail connected ports in New Zealand. The bulk of this money is due to be spent in the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 financial years.

Share this

38 comments

  1. I don’t think you need to blame “value engineering” for the bus shelters at Drury, Ngākōroa and Paerātā…
    I think it is that Kiwirail, or whoever else sign off on these things simply don’t care about “self loading freight” aka passengers,

    This belief is reinforced by a quick look at Rotokauri station, built totally new for Te Hiua (and back in the day of free flowing money from left wing governments)… once again the only passenger protection on the platforms are ,,,,,,”bus shelters”

    It really seems that Kiwirail simply don’t care….

    1. Kiwirail is not involved in funding and/or building railway stations on Auckland and Wellington metro rail networks. This is the responsibility of Auckland Council through Auckland Transport ,Greater Wellington Regional Council, Hamilton City Councils for Rotokauri and Waikato District Council for Huntly through NZ Transport Agency and rate payers.

      I do agree with you about bus shelters especially at Rotokauri and Huntly, they are the cheaper option instead of full platform cover.

      1. The bus shelters are entirely adequate for a station used only a few times a day. Plenty of other things need money spent more urgently starting with new trains.

        1. Zippo – It seems that you haven’t been at Rotokauri railway station on a could winter’s or on a hot summer’s day, waiting for Te Huia. It is not a pleasant experience.

  2. Pluviality must be worth half a point in a geography exam. I like it.

    But check out how narrow the platform is- its about three people wide. Now compare it with Rolleston or Masterton. What is going on at Kiwirail?

    1. Compare how much of the government’s budget is allocated to roading vs rail and the answer becomes very clear.

  3. I have thought that Auckland should run our electrified commuter service to Tuakau and Pokeno. Every time I head over the Bombay Hills I am astonished how full the Pokeno basin is, and I hear that many commute North into Auckland City

    1. You would think that a capitalist government obsessed on the surface with efficiency and making the most with the least would immediately recognise the fact that we have the track, the trains, and the stations, and could start benefitting from it overnight by adding these services. It’s like a factory having a perfectly functioning machine taking up space and not using it for manufacturing.

    2. Pokeno is located in the Waikato region and comes under the Waikato District Council and is connected to the Waikato’s regional bus network – Busit, with regular 7 days a week bus services between Pokeno, Tuakau, Buckland and Pukekohe.

      The Auckland metro rail network ends a Pukekohe. That said, Kiwirail is pushing ahead with a detail business case to be presented to its shareholder – the government, to electrify from Pukekohe to Te Rapa and Tauranga.

      1. That problem is of course solveable as they are just lines on a map. From 2029 Greater Wellington will be operating trains that run to Palmerston North in the Horizons Regional Council area.

        There is a lot of logic to AT suburban trains going as far as Pokeno, even if on a lower frequency.

        1. Jezza – Yes, the Greater Wellington regional council (GWRC) will be owning the new train sets and operating them under the ‘Metlink’ brand. Funding for Wellington to Palmerston North services, GWRC would funded services between Wellington and Otaki and Horizons will fund services between Otaki and Palmerston North, as the boundary between the two regions is just north of Otaki.

          With regards to Auckland metro train services traveling onto Tuakau and Pokeno, they will only be allowed to drop off passengers, unless the Waikato regional council agrees to passenger pick up, which they won’t, as it will affect Te Huia services.

          The boarder between Auckland and Waikato regions is between Buckland and Tuakau, hence Pukekohe station is deemed to be a ‘boarder’ station for the two regions in regards to public transport funding.

        2. I’m well aware of where the border is. The obvious question is why on earth would the Waikato Regional Council bar AT trains from picking up passengers at stations Te Huia doesn’t stop at!?

          All this needs is a government to get Auckland Council and Waikato RC to get together and sort it out, which means it probably won’t happen for a while.

    3. Waikato could start by petitioning the govt to electrify the tracks, and operating connecting DMUs, similar to what Pukekohe had prior to electrification.

      1. I wonder what the best way forward is obviously right or wrong we are going to see linear sprawl all the way from Auckland to Hamilton. So do we expand the Auckland service or Te Huia. Can we use batteries to run trains on non electrified sections of track or should we just crack on with electrification. In the end a political decision will be made. I wonder if National will come up with something next year for the election. We can be sure though there are no cheap solutions even if they were possible in the past.

    4. Same could be said for Kumeū in the North. The traffic through there is insane also the spread of houses. They have a disused railway station but no service.

  4. We have on excellent train station, which used to be our post office, so benefits architecturally from its history, and also serves the City Centre. New Lynn is also an excellent transport centre. Otahuhu is not bad either. We can build these things nicely, so why can we not build them equitably, so that the maximum number of citizens of our city can benefit from them. Rain is, and always has been a serious thing in our city, and wet socks, wet undies etc. are no fun to pass the entire day experiencing. If The Floods taught us that our drainage was failing, why have we not acknowledged that our sky roof cries a lot, and we deserve a little shelter from the storms?

  5. Very little about the South Island?? A major port not rail connected is Nelson. In 1960 when the city was very much smaller than it is now a plan for a link to Blenhiem even got to work beginning before the nrwly elected National government stopped it. Now it would be well worth it. Nelson is now almost as big as Dunedin. Is it ever thought about now?

    1. Looking at the potential costs for the Port Marsden branch I think if it was thought of the thinking would quickly end when the cost became apparent unfortunately.

      As much as it would be isolated, there would probably be more value initially in reinstating the old Nelson branch to at least bring logs into the port.

    2. That is a very big dream. So much better to invest in the lines that already exist. Reefton. Hokitika. Westport.
      no passenger trains go there.

    1. A daily shuttle between Rotorua and Auckland would have year-round demand. The Intercity coach is slow, constrained by congestion and not even particularly cheap.

      The site of Rotorua station in the town centre now contains a ginormous retail park, but it’s so vast that you could probably stick a station there with ease.

  6. What has happened to the old Auckland-Whangarei freight link? This used to run via Helensville north. The illustrious pair of Peters and Jones floated this idea but it went nowhere when it was realized that tunnels would need to be built to accommodate flat deck wagons carrying high cube containers. Solution put more fossil fueled vehicles onto already roads needing extensive modification and repairs at taxpayers expense.

  7. Meanwhile in other news…
    After 80 years, UK govt. is nationalising their railways again.
    Check out Great British Railways.

    1. Chalk and Cheese,
      The UK rail network remained in Public ownership throughout the period of Private Rail operators.
      Many franchise owners are basically finding no profit in operating rail services and are walking away. But even at the end of the process there will still be Private operators,

      The Elizabeth line which based on patronage is arguably the most profitable rail line in the UK, will be operated by The Tokyo Metro, under a contract with TfL.

  8. Auckland shouldn’t fund Te Huia unless we get a timetable more suitable for Aucklanders. The timetable is set for someone who wishes to spend the day in Auckland and the night in the Tron. Needs weekend services aimed at day trips to the Tron.

    1. Funding from Auckland would enable more trains, thus delivering an Auckland-friendly Te Huia service.

  9. I have being a observer of the third main project. It being well done but it sure took a long time. The one unfathomable feature is the failure to install a third platform at Puhinui Station surely that will be needed to manage train movement especially if more Auckland Hamilton services and or express trains are to be run.

    1. Yes, that’s weird. It’s by far the best-specced station in Auckland, yet the nearside platform is a tiny stub, just waiting to grow into a full-size structure.

      Hell, even Middlemore has a third platform these days.

    2. This should have been built and opened as a four track, four platform (as two wide islands – save on lifts/escalators and better for cross-transfers) – even when the railway either side was two track.

      Could be used for:
      – turning shorter services in peaks
      – terminating during disruption/works
      – freight passing
      – expresses passing stoppers
      – Te Huia stops / passing / even turning (when it began and went to Papakura!)

      there is hardly any of this type of flexibility on the network, what a missed chance. Dumb dumb dumb.

  10. A few points. Northland. KiwiRail is spending a billion dollars on constructing the spur rail line to NorthPort while NorthPort does not have the approval to expand the port and dredge the channel. Does this have similarities to the approach with the Cook Strait projects? Auckland/ near Auckland. Auckland Transport’s ethos is any of their electric trains should be able to be used anywhere in their area. The hybrid/ battery technology has improved since AT rejected hybrid/ battery. Newer battery tech would allow ADT’s with this tech to go further north and south without the installation of overheads. The Shining Triangle. Should the double tracking the Te Kauwhata section, etc have taken priority over the NorthPort spur? Waikato Regional Council could have partnered with the lower North Island for a greener & faster Te Huia solution. North America is converting diesel electric locomotives to hydrogen, (hydrogen locomotives can weigh less than diesel) how does this compare to overhead electrical power for the missing Waikato section & to Tauranga? Christchurch – should be the next place NZ does passenger rail.

  11. Thought provoking article. The South Island has incredible rail tracks that are completely under used for any commuter purpose. The fares and timetables are ridiculous. it is purely a tourist rip off. meanwhile , freight trains do operate but without connections to NI.
    it makes me so sad because the basic infrastructure is in place and has been for decades, just no government will invest in any long term future.
    my opinions and experience come from an appreciation of Victorian craftsmanship.
    i have lived on the canals in England. With investment and community support they became revitalized.
    and the New Zealand Rail network can too.

  12. Greenwely, from the mid 1990s the British Rail network was 100% privatised, and rolling stock ownership, freight and ancillary services still are (with the odd exception) and will continue to be. The infrastructure was renationalised when Railtrack went bust 10 or so years later, and since then some passenger operators have walked away, but most of the passenger operations that have been renationalised up to now are because their private operators failed to perform.

    All the central government-franchised operators will be taken back in-house: this policy does not apply to local/regional franchisors such as TfL , nor to open-access operators.

  13. Shame that South Island has lost all its affordable rail… $500 to go Chch to Greymouth… Tourists catered for but not locals.
    We need affordable rail transport from Invercargill to ChCh and Picton.
    I say ditch Rio Tinto that’s getting cheap electricity at Bluff and electrify the whole South Island line.
    This Government is useless when it comes to fairness in rail infrastructure down here . Not voting for them again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *