I am part of a new team running in the Entrust election in October.

Entrust is a community electricity trust representing a significant swathe of Auckland, and set up to serve the community. It is governed by five trustees, who are elected every three years in an election the trust itself oversees.

C&R have controlled the trust for the last thirty years and have successfully reduced awareness of this community asset, running it like a private fiefdom, often chaotically, achieving very little.

Last election, turnout was only 9.5% of eligible voters. The C&R trustees insist on running a postal ballot campaign only. This alone is pretty outrageous, undemocratic, and needs to change. It also clearly shows their level of competence and the level of their commitment to the community they are supposed to be serving.

The world is also a very different place from when they took control last century: the imperatives of the electricity market, as well as generation technologies, have completely changed, but C&R have kept Entrust standing still.


What Is Entrust?

Entrust is a community trust set up to serve the community via its ownership of a historically community-built asset.

It is not a commercial company with shareholders, but a community asset with the following responsibility:

source: Entrust deed

Entrust owns a controlling 75.1% stake in Vector, with a current market valuation of $2.8b. This is a substantial community asset.

Vector is Auckland’s lines company with the sole responsibility for the distribution of electricity in the Auckland region. It is a regulated monopoly.

Under C&R for the last 30 years, Entrust has shown no ambition to support consumers in the trust area beyond passing on the annual dividend, which has consistently declined in real terms over this period.

In our view, much more can be done by the trust for the community, especially to lower bills and increase security of supply, especially as we face accelerating disruptions. As well, much more can be done to grow the asset, for future dividends, for general community benefit, and for future generations.

For an electricity trust, the ‘interests of consumers’ are specifically in:

  • Lower power bills
  • Increased security of supply
  • Greater resilience during emergencies
  • Addressing energy poverty
  • Advancing decarbonisation

New technology, combined with lower costs, means there are many ways Entrust could be serving its community better while also improving its financial performance.

Vector knows this. Here is Robyn Holdaway, discussing this in 2020 as the Group Manager Public Policy at Vector, :

“There is an opportunity to increase competition and create a new downward price pressure in our electricity market by unlocking new value from the demand side of our energy supply chains. Led by UK think tank, Challenging Ideas, and supported by a global cross-sector project team including Vector, ReCosting Energy reveals new added value for EVs, batteries, and energy efficiency through a first ever comparison between demand-side actions and assets, and centralised energy generation.”

Clearly, despite Entrust’s controlling stake, there has been a lack of leadership and direction from Entrust to Vector. No sign of innovation or ambition

A trial of solar panels on social housing, Wellington. Source: Ara Ake.

What could be done?

The key responsibility and opportunity held by a collective customer body is to use its buying power to get the customer nearer to the centre of the equation; in this case to re-balance the energy supply chain. Currently we are all just price-takers, and retail electricity prices have been rising around 3% per year, doubling every decade. This is inflicting real harm on many households and businesses.

There’s a great need (and opportunity) for Auckland, the country’s biggest single market, to flex a bit of its demand-side muscle to reduce this asymmetrical pattern as much as is possible.

New technologies in distributed generation and storage offer the way to achieve this. Sparking a rollout of solar panels and batteries across the city – ideally to levels comparable to those seen overseas – is a present and proven way to counteract the gentailer oligopoly. This ‘behind the meter’ low-cost and clean supply, as it scales up, has the potential to materially improve so many key outcomes:

  • Additional supply to the country’s biggest electricity market at zero transmission costs
  • New supply not controlled and priced by the big power companies, i.e. real price competition
  • Local ‘behind-the-meter’ power that’s free from the risk of generation shortage or transmission outages in the national system
  • Cheapest available source of electricity -roof top solar does not even have land costs (unlike solar farms)
  • Empowerment of people, communities, and companies to participate in the new clean energy economy

Currently only 2% of Auckland’s roofs have panels. In Australia, the figure is 35%. Auckland is on the same latitude as Victoria, so is a perfectly good place for solar. Rooftop solar costs as little as 6c/kWh, compared to anything from three to six times more being currently charged by the big power companies.

Source:Rewiring Aotearoa: Electric Homes report (2023)

Fuels to Finance

“Electrification involves swapping fuels for finance” – Rewiring Aotearoa

If solar is so cheap, why aren’t more people installing it already? Because there’s an upfront cost. It’s as if you’re buying 30 years of free power upfront. Not many households can afford that, and if they need to borrow it, the interest pushes out the value further.

In Australia and elsewhere, the market system has been tweaked to make that calculation more worth it, and that opened the flood gates for solar. We are now in a world where financial structures are the key, rather than access to fuels to burn.

The More for you; better for Auckland team will lobby hard for local adoption of these small but essential changes, such as symmetrical tariffs. But there are also other more direct ways Entrust can accelerate the rollout of rooftop solar, without relying on the government or others to catch up.

Source: MBIE

1. Solar and Batteries in Homes

One model that is already in a successful trial with 150 community housing homes in Wellington, is for Entrust to finance the total solar/battery installation, and retain an interest in the system in order to pay back the investment. The household, whether renting or owned, immediately gets lower bills – and the trust gets its money back by selling excess solar power back into the grid. This can happen surprisingly fast.

In other words: lower bills for the dwelling occupants at no upfront cost, and the trust builds a new asset over time.

Done at scale, this also has the effect of restraining electricity demand growth for the whole city. This reduces upwards pressure both on prices and on the need for the nation to build ever more power stations and transmission systems elsewhere. All by adding more clean supply: win/win/win.

Source: Rewiring Aotearoa’s 2024 report Investing in Tomorrow: The Electrification Opportunity

2. Community Solar for Resilience

Another important plan is to support the rollout of solar and batteries on community centres, churches, and marae across the trust area. This would work in a similar way; lowering bills for those organisations all year, every year, and repaying the trust by trading surplus electricity to the market.

But also: because of the batteries, it means these important community centres would be able to keep running on their own systems through emergencies like floods or earthquakes. Or any event that interrupts supply from distant power stations throughout the country. We know these are places we rely on in unexpected events, and we also know we should expect increased events of this kind in the years ahead.

The cost to add a 10kW system of panels and a battery is currently around $30,000. We could supply 100 of these to community buildings for less than a third of the $10m that Entrust spends annually on undergrounding power lines on a couple of streets.

This would have more immediate impact on more people’s lives, as well as paying for itself in a relatively short period, thus freeing up that money to be invested all over again in greater community value. Again, win/ win/ win.

Church solar

3. South Auckland Commercial Powerhouse

A third, and even bigger, plan is to partner with owners of commercial buildings to build a massive ‘virtual power station’ in commercial zones: all those empty roofs you see when flying into Mangere airport in South Auckland.

Together these can support a massive South Auckland Power Station, bigger even than our biggest hydro power station deep in the South Island, or indeed the Huntly gas and coal station in the Waikato. Gigawatt scale, all with no moving parts, nor taking up any new land that isn’t already built on.


All or any of these programmes can be incrementally built up, increasing the trust’s asset base and value, employing young Aucklanders in good skilled jobs, and without years of complicated consenting delays, or leading to importing ever more fossil fuels.

Furthermore this also does help address the problem of the whole country’s reliance on hydro in a dry year. Everyday more water will be able to be retained in our dams as this growing solar supply in Auckland reduces the need to rely on it for baseload. Enabling our inherited hydro resource to operate more like a massive battery than to run constantly. Big urban solar complements our existing system extremely well.

This is a process that has already revolutionised power markets  all over the world including Australia, California, Texas, and Pakistan. Currently Auckland is missing out.

Image by Kyle Paala. source: Architecture Now

New Leadership at Entrust for a Financially Smarter Future

Entrust is the right vehicle to spark this, because it is yours: it is community-owned, and on the side of the power user. The big power companies, on the other hand, are set up to grow by increasing your power bills. Over the last decade, power bills have increased on average by 3% a year, every year, and are projected to keep on increasing. And now this rate of growth is projected to accelerate, as the Commerce Commission has put out a provisional decision for future increases modelled in the red dotted line in the chart below:

Only action at scale by and for power users, to push back on this big monopoly, can create a balancing force against this endless cost growth.

Additionally, this is the future – where every building is a power generator, has power storage, as well as being a power user. It is important for Auckland and Vector to get moving towards this future, or we will find our city and economy unable to compete, burdened with excessive cost.


Fossil Free Future

The financially smartest electricity system is also the cleanest; there are so many co-benefits to accelerating this transition through innovation.

Entrust is well placed to help Aucklanders unlock the great wealth prize through solar and batteries – as described so well by Dr Saul Griffiths, founder of Rewiring America and Australia, and chief advisor to Rewiring Aotearoa, in this recent interview with Jack Tame on Q&A.


How to vote

Voting papers will arrive at households in the Entrust district from October 10th. It is recommended to get completed papers in the post no later than October 21st to arrive by election day Friday 25th October. 

Or there are a select number of Woolworths supermarket that apparently will have ballot boxes too.

Please take the time to check us out and vote in the Entrust election if you are eligible.

https://www.moreforyoubetterforauckland.nz/

Share this

45 comments

  1. Great initiative. The Rewiring report is very timely and this is a great use of the intel contained in it.

    Those with mortgages and just a little space room in their household budgets can benefit directly from this themselves. Obviously this is not everyone now, but it will be a lot of people in the next cycle of lower interest rates. If people can put some of the savings from interest rate drops into the solar plus batteries on a green loan (0-1%), there is the direct to consumer benefit.

  2. Great idea. But don’t forget schools. They are almost perfect for solar operating in peak 9-3 solar period. And they can make money selling excess power in holidays and weekends. Also, many schools are civil defence centres so having solar and batteries make them more resilient in a disaster. But schools need external support to get solar as they generally can’t afford it themselves. In my community a small number of residents loaned the primary school money at a low interest rate to put solar on the classrooms and when the loan was paid off the school then owned the panels.

  3. Really good news Patrick, good luck getting better engagement.

    Regarding roof top solar, here in Otautahi Christchurch I’m in the planning phase of installing a 11kW array (inverter output 10kw) and the likely installed cost is ~$15k (no battery). This includes additional hardware as the roof is not perfect so this is a real world case, although for larger scale you should be able to bring the costs down.
    My modelling shows around 14,000 kWh actual annual production would have occurred in the last 12 months, based on a real installation that is close by (adjusting for panel tilt etc).
    So cashflow payback occurs just after 5 years !
    Running NPV “games” shows a variety of effective costs per kWh, although this is very sensitive to the model assumptions. I’ve chosen 5% as return/risk free cost of capital and included generation for the next 12 years even though the system has an assumed lifetime of 25+ years. This shows a cost per kWh of $0.12. By way of comparison local tariffs here are around 30c for peak/day, and around 15/18c for off peak/night.

    What it actually means is that for fortunate people, such as myself that can afford to bank such a project, we get free power after the payback period has elapsed. It would be really nice if community trusts could help others to achieve energy security, people who would otherwise be at the mercy of the rigged “market” through no fault of their own.

    1. Yes. If we end up with the wealthy having cheap electricity but their rental tenants still subject to market prices (controlled by the wealthy) the problems would include not just equity, but energy decision-making that would would favour certain demographics (with solar ownership being the proxy).

      This team certainly gets my vote.

    2. We’ve recently also put (20) panels on our roof and will watch for a year before (possibly) adding a battery.
      One of the things I noticed through the submission & quote process from the various vendors was that they were all fixated on the payback period, none suggested it would actual increase the value of the house.
      This raised my curiosity so I asked CoreLogic if they had done any research on the increased value or time to sell for houses with solar already installed, but they hadn’t.
      Many people I talk to about our installation think installing solar on their house a complex project they would rather not get into so I’m sure having solar(& or batteries) already installed would increase the house value by greater than the actual cost of the installation.

    1. That link shows the C&R team to be two Chartered Accountants, a Medical Clinician, a Lawyer and an exMP. Where’s the expertise in new energy systems, or old energy systems for that matter? What about infrastructure and cities? Doesn’t seem surprising that all C&R has focused on is the dividend and not provided the strategic guidance Vector requires.

    2. C&R have had 30 years to actually achieve something, they haven’t. So either these ‘experienced people’ are especially incompetent or have no interest whatsoever in doing anything, or some combination of the two.
      They certainly have spent a lot of time squabbling with each other, all the way to the courts, even: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/106713483/entrust-rift-deepens-as-judge-opens-court-file.
      It is easy write that list of outcomes on a website every three years, but if after 30 years with nothing to show for it, changing the team is the least I’d do. Also note they never how they intend to achieve any of these worthy aims.

  4. What Is Entrust?
    “Entrust is a community trust set up to serve the community via its ownership of a historically community built asset.”
    No,”Entrust is a trust set up to provide for its directors,at the expense of community” ,$65,000 per year for some coffee meetings.
    We only need to look over the ditch,Australia,to see where power generation,storage is headed,they are light years ahead of us.
    I find it ironic ,that the solutions to two of our major infrastructure issues,transport and electricity, have solutions,that “big business” cannot capitalise on.

    1. Australia is just so different to us. a) they have very little renewables (South Australia is the exception) so they can and do subsidise renewables like solar, just as Germany etc have done. In NZ we already have over 80% renewables, the incentive logic is less compelling here
      b) Aussie power use coincides with peak solar, even in winter, not so in NZ
      c) We have a winter evening and early morning peak when solar peaks in the middle of the day middle of summer.
      d) And the real big issue and Patrick you should be aware of this is that a big rollout of solar (without batteries) means the peaks in power consumption remain as they are outside the solar hours, but the daytime troughs between the peaks get deeper and deeper with more solar penetration. What this means is that we need greater and greater peaking power. So really we need to change our hydros, that already do pretty much all the peaking cover, to do even more. We need to increase their capacity to generate more power during the peak times (and hold water back during the sunny daytime periods. This requires changes to the the hydro dams. While the Clyde dam was built with extra penstocks built in ready to go, I think it is the only one like that. Others would need new penstocks and turbines.

  5. Mostly sounds good. Would be a disappointment to see the undergrounding programme stopped though – especially as this has been disproportionately undertaken in the ‘rich’ suburbs who vote for C and R.

    1. Sorry if that isn’t clear, I was just using the undergrounding budget as a scale. Undergrounding, especially when coordinated with other utilities for efficiency, will continue, and just not only in rich neighbourhoods.

      1. Glad to hear that Patrick! 🙂

        Overhead power lines are one of my pet peeves, they are ugly and affect resiliency (trees falling on them in storms etc) among many other problems.

        Undergrounding power lines to improve the quality of the public realm is a great example of a public investment that benefits everyone, please do continue it and increase it as much as possible.

        1. Yes and we have just had trees planted directly below power lines in berms in Te Atatu. A friend questioned the contractors who said not to worry we have the contract to keep trimming them back!

  6. Who on earth is paying more than 20c per KWH for electricity if you are you are getting ripped off. Asked around the workplace someone on mercury paying 16c contact about 17-18c. Rooftop solar has caused issues in Australia with too much “micro generation” pushing up the cost of the grid for everyone as effectively people on solar use the grid as a battery for free hence why buyback rates have been slashed by many companies.

    1. Who is paying more? Most of New Zealand, actually. I live in an apartment building in Wellington – no option for me to have rooftop solar – paying Meridian 25c per kilowatt for power, using approx 11kW per day.

      This sounds like a great idea Patrick. I wish you all the best with Entrust.

    2. Errrr, pretty much everyone. Unless you just flick your fuse box off during the day and only use electricity between midnight and 6am.

      Ah yes, another bad faith argument that people shouldsn’t generate their own renewable energy.

  7. Great idea and clearly looks to benefit the majority rather than the few ( which surely should be how we do everything). We are fortunate to have installed solar ( couldn’t afford battery but that is next) and received our first annual report – from the grid we are using a quarter of the power an average ” low user” family of our size uses. As you say having on roof solar reduces the costs of new infrastructure and puts power into the hands of the community.

  8. Rather than starting an all out culture war I would rather see a solution that all parties even the cit and rates could go for. I would suggest backing the installation of modest amounts of solar panels wired directly to the home hot water cylinders. I will post a link to a company which specialises in supplying this product when I find it. We know lines companies already control hot water so it would fit into their existing operating model. I would suggest you leave the electricity market to national politicians rather than local body ones. After all they caused the present mess so they should get to fix it up. Anyway back to my suggestion. Solar panels are cheap power inverters and batteries are not. Water heating is a large portion of demand. Hot water cylinders are energy storage devices. I will not be voting for you.

    1. A significant proportion of the expense is the going to site and sending the tradies up on the roof. As long as that’s being done, it makes sense to max out the number of panels. Inverters are not that cheap but still panel/inverter only systems pay themselves back quite fast. Batteries are at least 5 years behind on their cost reduction curves, but prices are falling fast and even now the right sized battery makes sense if you can use it to avoid peak prices. Anyone who looked at the economics of this more than a year ago will be out of date.

    2. Electric cars mean that every household has a battery by default,these can be used to smooth out electricity peaks,at no extra cost,finally the car becomes useful,whilst sitting in the driveway.

      1. Yes but the big benefit is the EV battery rather than the solar panels – they can be charged up in the dead of the night at low electricity cost, low demand periods and feed back into he grid at peak times. The venerable Nissan Leafs have had this capability built into them since 2012. My understanding though is that this needs an expensive wallbox to convert battery power to mains power.
        And just to note here that for EVs to soak up the surplus solar power they need to be on a plug during the day. Those that are used for daily commuting are unlikely to be on a plug during the day unless there is one at your work.

      1. On one side we have Simeon Brown wanting to import LNG and on the other we have Patrick Reynolds backing roortop solar and storage and no doubt subsidies for businesses and home owners to install it. It looks and smells like something which will quickly develop into a repeat of the clean car rebate which has being rolled back so comprehensively by the new government that you could argue that it did more harm than good. We are looking for middle of the road solutions.

        1. What a baffling claim Royce. The new minister has stolen years from our futures by delaying the transition to EVs by killing the CCD. It was working, sparking the shift well, another yeah and a good secondhand market would have been created too.

          There is zero chance that LNG imports can happen without massive subsidies, or your power bill will be several times higher than now, the most expensive possible source. And even if they do somehow stay in power long enough to force this on us it will soon be pulled as we lose our export markets to climate tariffs.

          There is no future in doubling down on last century’s junk.

        2. It’s only baffling to you because you refuse to recognise that people have different ways of thinking. The art of getting things done is to find solutions that the majority can support or at least tolerate. You may have some success taking a antagonistic approach the CRL comes to mind but then you have ownership every time it fails. And fail it will and my prediction it will be top of the news evertime it does just as Labours oil and gas exploration ban is everytime we get a bit short off electricity. Rethink your approach.

  9. As I use to live on Waiheke Island for 20 plus years , what got me was when Chorus was putting Fibre underground why did not Vector do it at the same time with their lines ? . As this would have given the Islanders a more reliable power supply mainly on Stormy weather days or was that something that was in the too hard Basket

    1. Fiber was a minor job compared to undergrounding 3 phase power, and instead of worlds better service, it would only get very slightly better. Maybe if Waiheke citizens would be willing to pay an additional $50-100 a month in power bills for 10 years to pay it off. Doubt that would be the case.

      There are much cheaper ways to buy better uptime. Vector actually has quite bad outage stats compared to Orion in Christchurch for example. Chch has a heap of overhead lines too. Things like better tree trimming, better network architecture so faults can be isolated and most connections can quickly be switched on, tech to simplify fault finding, more spares on hand, general maintenance, having more line mechanics on payroll.

      I suspect Entrust has partaken in some asset stripping to maintain their high payouts.

      1. Have lived in different Suburbs around Auckland city where they did Underground power and there were no extra charges , it was just done .

  10. This is a good idea. Solar seems a more feasible now days. Wanted to install solar panels, but the financing at the time I looked into made it uneconomical plus our roof (Decramastic) apparently can’t take them. Yes, I only just noticed the other day the banks, well ASB at least, offer a 1% green loan (Min 20% equity) for such things and even a hybrid or electric vehicle. You can also get a heat pump water heater.
    https://www.asb.co.nz/home-loans-mortgages/better-homes-top-up.html
    Quick look ANZ has one, mentions e-bikes too.

  11. Solar may work…

    until HOAs decide it is “ugly” and we’ll get a standard rule against solar panels, similar to how every HOA already has a rule against washing lines.

    Or what with body corporates? If you live in a place with a BC it is not even your roof. And is it even possible for a BC to spend money on solar?

    1. A regulation to prevent that is definitely needed. Lucky we’re a society, eh, so we can make appropriate rules. Ha. First we need the Council !!!! to remove the restrictions against solar panels for homes in “special interest or heritage zone” areas.

      Council planners: this is so pathetic it’s embarrassing.

  12. If you look at where they’ve undergrounded vs where current and previous board members live, it’s all really that’s needed to see.

    Happy to try to vote them out.

  13. There’s another reason Ministers of Finance don’t like roof top solar as all the energy produced and used on site doesn’t create any financial transactions so are invisible to GDP measures. If we all went rooftop tomorrow under conventional GDP measures the country would be going backwards. Haha
    The old adage to “follow the money” doesn’t work here so there’s nothing to tax, no GST on your own generation.

    1. A decade-long rolling programme of installs will generate both a lot of tax and a lot of jobs. Then there are the ways that cheap energy wil be used. This seems like plenty to sell any finance minister on.

  14. Patrick all power to you! It should be noted that symmetrical metering is defined as same price for feeding back into the grid as taking from the grid AT THAT TIME. This is really important as people whinge about low prices for power they feed into the grid, but the thing is they are feeding into at lower consumption times, not at the evening and early morning peaks.
    Secondly it really is nuts expecting to be able to use the grid as an infinity deep battery available at any time for zero cost. This is why all people with solar have to accept some significant lines charges for this benefit.
    If people don’t accept this, just try going off grid like us and see what it is like getting through a gloomy winter week with very little sunshine and your daughter having a birthday party and guests arriving. You need a massive battery for these low solar times and that is what the grid is providing and you should be prepared to pay for.
    Lastly Auckland is a bit of a special case in power consumption with a summer daytime air conditioning load that like Aussie ties in nicely with solar power generation profiles. Unfortunately it doesn’t do anything for winter space heating (and other loads that go up in winter like lighting and water heating (increases 20% cp summer))
    Lastly see other comments re need our hydros to be more and more backups for renewables.

  15. It’s about time we got rid of the incumbent pigs at the trough!
    Bring on Greater Auckland ASAP!
    I can’t wait to vote!

    1. Yes, I looked it up, they are getting posted out from tomorrow onwards but you gotta post them back by the 21st or use a Woolworth ballot box.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *