As we have written before on Transportblog, we think that choice in housing and transport markets is really important. In particular, Aucklanders need to be able to choose not to live in apartments. Therefore we must act now to ban anyone from building any apartments.
Thanks to the excellent investigative journalism practiced by the NZ Herald, we have become aware that apartments pose an existential threat to our way of life. Alleged political leader Len Brown has conspired with Auckland Council’s urban planners, many of whom started their careers developing five-year plans for collectivising agriculture under Joseph Stalin, to bulldoze Auckland and replace it with brutalist apartment towers. We must resist this at all costs.
These agents of darkness are also in league with a cabal of greedy developers, who will stop at nothing in their sick quest to make money by building homes for people. I’m horrified, simply horrified, that private businesses would seek to maximise their profits. That sort of antisocial behaviour shouldn’t be allowed.
If those sick bastards get their way, this could be our fate too.
Nobody wants to live in apartments, anyway, so there is no drawback to preventing them from being constructed. And anyone who does want to live in them is not a real New Zealander, and we wouldn’t want to have them around anyway. We have community standards to uphold. They probably don’t even own barbecues!
If we don’t ban the construction of new apartments, people will build them in such great numbers that they will drown out the sun from the gardens, porches, and barbecues of real New Zealanders. And because they will exclusively attract the “wrong type of people” (hint, hint), upstanding Epsomites will be overrun by an unprecedented wave of burglaries and violence. It’s only a matter of time until Auckland’s leafy suburbs resemble a war zone.
Some unscrupulous capitalist is currently marketing these Grey Lynn apartments to P dealers and biker gangs.
But that’s only the tip of this nightmarish iceberg. What’s worse is that building apartments on public transport routes will result in so much traffic congestion that it will prevent anyone from driving anywhere ever again. Auckland’s economy will collapse as self-employed tradesmen from Pakuranga will have to spend an extra five minutes driving to job sites.
The irony is that we will ultimately have to demolish said apartments to widen all of our roads. Fortunately, everyone knows that widening roads is a successful strategy for reducing congestion. Look at the Southern Motorway. We’ve been widening that for over 50 years, and traffic’s totally free-flowing.
In short, we have a stark choice: Ban apartments, or face utter catastrophe. Transportblog is standing up against the inhumanity of intensification. People need to be able to choose not to live in apartments, rather than being frog-marched into them at gunpoint as envisaged under the Unitary Plan.
Just like in Manhattan, where brutal totalitarian Michael Bloomberg has forced the world’s richest investment bankers into tiny shoeboxes.
Banning apartments is a great first step, but in the long term we have to prevent people coming to Auckland and trying to live in them. The only sane option available to us is a policy of eugenics and internal passports to prevent that from happening. It may seem draconian, but similar measures have succeeded wildly in countries as diverse as communist China, Soviet Russia, and apartheid South Africa.
Lastly, I recently realised that I do, in fact, live in an apartment in a leafy inner suburb. It is urgent that we prevent this sort of thing from spreading. As a prophylactic measure, I have driven my neighbours out of their homes, dynamited the buildings, and am awaiting a call back from a developer who’s interested in building an intimidatingly large McMansion on the site.




Processing...
Hear hear! The sooner we can stop the Dresdensification of Auckland the better! Damned freedom haters!
In other news…
Controversial American property tycoon Donald Trump has locked horns with ACT leader David Seymour over proposals to build New York-style apartments in the MP’s Epsom electorate. The apartments, if approved, will exceed the current height record held by the 328m-tall Sky Tower.
Both Trump and Seymour have accused each other of refusing to respect property rights. “Mr Seymour supposedly represents the interests of free enterprise and welcomes foreign investment with open arms, and I just wish he’d keep his word,” Mr Trump said earlier today. Mr Seymour hit back in a press release saying that “Nothing trumps the rule of law in New Zealand, and Epsom is already the densest suburb in the country”.
Opposition leader Andrew Little has accused Mr Seymour of hypocrisy, pointing out that “while ACT wants to effectively abolish the Resource Management Act, the ACT leader is using the very same law to try and veto Mr Trump’s development.”
I reserve the right to commute 3 hours per day from Northern Waikato to Auckland.
By ass, no doubt, Jesus.
PS: I wouldn’t make holiday plans for Easter if I were you.
He should be fine from Monday evening.
“He should be fine from Monday evening”
Just in time to start the working week. Ironic, isn’t it. Practically invent the holiday and you don’t get to enjoy it (I think I would be very cross, if I were in his sandals). Starts off well…dinner with a bunch of mates and it goes downhill from there…unless he isn’t the real Jesus (ie Jesus H) but one of those foreign johnnies…you know, the “Hayzoos” chappies.
..but seriously, Jesus; have you considered living on, say, Rangitoto and just walking to work in the CBD? Active modes are very much de riguer and it beats sitting on your ass in the traffic.
You may laugh but I believe through a source and it seems to be backed up by subtle green flag waving by the PM and others, that the Waikato is being seen or hoped to be seen as the next property speculators paradise. I guess something has to replace the failing shambles that is the Auckland property market or else NZ’s “growth” rate will deteriorate!
And Remuera by location is ripe for the maximum concentration of Brutalist flats, hundreds of them on dozens of grey floors. Park Hill Estate in Sheffield is now considered a classic!
We should all be equally privileged! I’ve just looked at the map, and it turns out that the only way to give us every Aucklander the quarter-acre section (with attached motorway onramp) that is their true birthright is to annex much of the Waikato.
Hear! Hear! Finally this blog has seen the light! We demand the freedom to choose only the true kiwi dream of a house on a quarter acre section with 3 children and dog running around in the backyard while we cook our sausages on the BBQ. Only true kiwis want plenty of cars to drive around in to express our freedom. How else could we go to the beach and eat fish and chips!?! On a bicycle?! Ha! Anyone who wants anything otherwise should go back to their own country.
Brilliant! And of course you are not a real kiwi unless you own a lawn mower and you must use it before 9am every weekend whether your lawn needs it or not, and also you must have a leaf blower, plus your BBQ has to be a mammoth silver hooded thing that resembles a factory or a spaceship or you’re not a real man. Doesn’t matter if your garden is only a postage stamp, you must still have your own lawn mower, leaf blower and wardrobe sized BBQ.
Never mind the leaf blower; real men (TM) own chain saws and know how to use them.
Gosh, is it April 1st already? That means only 900 more sleeps till the next general election.
And I’m not fooling!
Yes they clearly didn’t take John Oliver’s pledge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXYXuXX48m8
I wondered what you meant by “we have been widening that (the southern motorway) for over 50 years…” then I realised you were being ironic. Most of it it is largely still as it was originally built.
Yep, certainly still looks like this
and this
At least the lanes have got narrower since then…
At least back then drivers kept to the left.
There seems to be a weird, almost religious belief that cafes will bring Auckland great wealth. That aside, I do like those Grey Lynn apartments. In fact there are any number of really nice apartment buildings, it’s just that they tend to be found in places that are not New Zealand.
Who says that? I have never seen anyone write that.
They are not a cause of wealth but they are a symptom of growing affluence and a vibrant, walkable neighbourhood.
Peter,
WHAT are you Auckland City Dwellers eating up there? That’s the third funny story one has heard today.
Gee… Auckland has potential for growing up….but out….um that’s where a good lively public transport system allocated into the right regions is a must…like Pokeno….Turn your streets into favourable shared green belts of trees & cycleway. The mini apartment blocks much like the Japanese are becoming more & more popular. Oh…dinner is on the table.
This is lifted straight from the Quax manifesto and you have failed to acknowkedge this. I foresee copyright action!
I don’t think these ideas belong to any single person. They’re just part of the zeitgeist. Or at least that’s what Bill Ralston told me at last week’s barbecue.
Interestingly ABS figures showed that apartment construction in Australia last year exceeded detached dwelling construction for the FIRST time ever. So at least you will be distinctive (apart from having non sledging cricketers) from Australians in the future.
Those Grey Lynn apartments look to located amongst some busy roading there. Wonder if there’s a lot of traffic noise?
Those Grey Lynn apartments look to be located amongst some busy roading there. Wonder if there’s a lot of traffic noise?