This is a more comprehensive post looking at the outcome of yesterday’s budget.

As mentioned briefly yesterday, when it comes to transport the big news of the budget was that government providing $375 million in an interest free loan towards $800 million of additional motorway projects that they had announced last year. The $800 million is made up of the projects below.

Budget 2014 - Auckland Transport package

The decision to do this along with the way it’s been done raises a lot of questions that I will try to work though below.

The projects will address congestion in our largest city, capitalise on the benefits of major roading projects already under way, such as the Western Ring Route, and improve access to Auckland International Airport.

“No Government has invested so heavily in transport infrastructure across all transport modes,” Mr Brownlee says.

“But with freight demand forecast to grow by around 50 per cent across the country in the next 30 years, and by almost 80 per cent in Auckland, and with a growing population, we’ve decided to bring a number of important projects forward.”

First of all since when have any projects like these ever ended up solving congestion for more than a couple of years at best. All they will do is encourage people to drive more either by taking additional trips, shifting trips closer to the peak or potentially even replacing trips currently made using public transport. As for the freight demand, while it is predicted to grow it’s not yet clear that it will actually happen. The recent Freight Demand Study released by the Ministry of Transport shows that freight volumes have been flat since 2006/07.

“Some of these projects were up to a decade from starting, but we’ve decided they simply must begin sooner to give Auckland the best opportunity of moving people and goods around the region,” Mr Brownlee says.

The comment saying that they’ve decided to bring the projects forward combined with the statement above show that despite what the government like to claim, they are really just picking projects they want to build. Alternatively they could just as easily have provided money to help kick start the CRL or build the infrastructure needed to make sure the new bus network can really hit the ground running. As for paying for it:

The $375 million will be transferred to NZTA as an interest-free loan, to be repaid to the Crown by funding currently allocated to these projects in the National Land Transport Fund up to 2026/27.

The Government is also announcing today $32.7 million of new operating funding over the next four years to cover the debt financing cost to the Crown of the interest-free loan.

I think the decision to use debt to pay for these projects raises a lot of questions.

Why is the loan interest free. The closest comparison we have is with the funding package to buy the Auckland’s new electric trains. In that the government have provided the council with an interest only loan and the council pay the interest payments but don’t actually get to pay down the capital value till the loan term expires in 35 years. By comparison this loan is interest free and will be paid off using funds from the NLTF. That will inevitably have an impact on what else can be funded through the NLTF and it’s likely to mean other projects elsewhere won’t be able to be funded as a result. This is a similar situation to what is planned to happen with the PPP being let for Transmission Gully and being proposed for Puhoi to Warkworth. Speaking of PPPs, it once again raises the question of why even bother using them instead of using a facility like being proposed for these Auckland Projects. If we’re going to be using debt to fund something then we might as well use government debt rather than pay the commercial rates of private consortium.

On top of that $800 million the government also confirmed some small amounts of money for the local road projects they were supporting.

  • Further investigations to determine the preferred scope of the East-West Link over 2014/15 ($10 million).
  • Progression of the Panmure to Pakuranga phase of the Auckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) over 2014/15 ($5 million).

The AMETI part mentioned will likely be to help fund the Notice of Requirement which AT are planning on lodging later this year however it’s the East-West Link that’s interesting. Why are we still trying to determine the scope of the project. That is work that was said to have been done already or is the government re-litigating it after complaints from business owners who want a full scale motorway?

All up with the motorway based spend up I get the feeling that this cartoon I posted the other day is only getting more and more relevant.

More Roads

The second big announcement was an additional $198 million for Kiwirail towards it’s turnaround plan. It will be used for

  • Infrastructure renewals and upgrades.
  • New wagons and refurbishment of existing wagons and locomotives.
  • IT systems.
  • Earthquake remediation projects and other safety works.

This is quite a positive sign as it puts the government’s investment well above what they said they would do a few years ago when the turnaround plan was launched. It suggests that perhaps the government are getting more confident about the future of Kiwirail which is good news.

Looking at the more detailed budget documents for the transport section shows a few other key points, here’s the overview.

Road

The largest element of the Vote is the funding for roading ($3,873 million or 86% of the total Vote).

This is primarily the funding for the National Land Transport Programme which is funded from road tax revenue collected by the Crown ($2,850 million or 63% of the Vote).

$1,012 million of the balance (22%) relates to loans from the Crown:

  • $750 million for cash flow management. This appropriation does not take account of any repayments made and the facility may not exceed $250 million at any one time
  • $107 million to advance the construction of the Tauranga Eastern Link
  • $100 million to rebuild earthquake damaged roads in Christchurch
  • $55 million for projects in the Auckland Transport Package.
Rail

Funding for Rail makes up 11% of the Vote – $511 million, mainly:

  • $198 million for the KiwiRail Turnaround Plan, the aim of which is put the freight business on a commercially viable footing
  • $192 million for a loan to the Auckland Council to assist with the funding of the Electric Multiple Unit package
  • $90 million for a grant to the Auckland Council to assist with the funding of the Electric Multiple Unit package
  • $16 million for metro rail projects in Wellington.
Crown Entity and Other Funding

The balance of the Vote ($135 million) is mainly split between:

  • $33 million for the Ministry of Transport as departmental funding
  • $25 million for Crown entities for outputs. The transport Crown entities receive most of their funding from third party fees and charges
  • $26 million for SuperGold card public transport concessions
  • $19 million for weather forecasting services from the Meteorological Service of New Zealand
  • $18 million for road user charges and fuel excise duty activities which are funded from fees and road tax revenue.

One question that springs to mind is why is the Tauranga Eastern Link need an additional $107 million. Surely that would have been part of the final contracts.

I think it’s really disappointing that the government still refuse to even consider helping fund the CRL, especially the cut and cover section from Britomart to Aotea that Len suggested earlier in the year. I think that section is going to end up being crucial to a whole raft of transport and urban improvement projects in Auckland.

All up for transport there wasn’t anything particularly surprising as it really just more of the same, which also means more roads.

Share this

38 comments

      1. Northland rail is “last man standing” on the current management regime’s hit-list of rail corridors. One might speculate and take another look at the large list that Toll were going to chop. However several rail corridors on Toll’s hit-list currently carry markedly more freight then they did when Toll was in charge. That is a hopeful sign.

        Big kudos to former CEO Jim Quinn for his focus on building the freight part of the business across the core main trunk network. Real upside here and the combination of better service, improved reputation and greater freight traffic is mission critical to rail’s future in NZ.

        The downside is the money hemorrhaging due to the Aratere problems, the DL lay-up, and if rumours are true, possible problems with the Chinese wagon fleet. Reality is that those three critical items need to be fixed urgently and properly…….and that is going to need further substantial money from the government.

  1. There is no science to their policy; just whim. I travel the road to the airport about half a dozen times a month, it is never a problem. It is so short there cannot be any time savings of any scale, anyway, how valuable is an additional 30s in the Koru Club?

    And this prespending of future tax means that this current road binge will come to a crashing end as fuel tax income decline accelerates. Despite their current popularity this government’s legacy will be this motorway white elephant- history will harsh, this policy will be ridiculed by future generations in the same way that Think Big was- The wrong policy at the wrong time; and pursued without measure.

  2. When you sort through the mist of bullshit this government puts outs in this budget, its the same old same old, failed roading policies..And surprise surprise, Keys mega conditional CRL promise was nothing more than empty vote grabbing. Gee I didn’t see that coming!. .

  3. does this loan free up $375m for other AKL projects? Were we going to have to front up that money ourselves previously, or was it always coming from central government? sorry if this is a dumb question.

    1. That money is a loan to NZTA, so they can do some projects earlier that were planned to happen farther in the future. It frees up nothing, and worse, it locks up future funding which will have to be spent repaying the loan, instead of on new stuff.

    2. Matthew, I think the loan just means that NZTA can start the projects sooner, rather than deferring them later till it had more money.I think Brownlee must be trolling us now. Every time they have the opportunity to divert extra money to public transport, they double down on roads instead. The find every excuse to fast-track roading projects, and every reason to stall on everything else. At this stage only a change of government will restore some sanity to the national transport spend.

      1. So in effect they are forcing the hand of the next decade of expenditure. Build all these big roads we want now, and you can spend the next ten years paying it off. No change of doing anything else for the next ten years while you pay us back.

        1. These are the actions of people who know they’ll be out of power before long, but want to lock in their priorities so the incoming government can’t change it

    1. Wonder how many students they asked until they found one that was happy that nothing was being spent on PT and only on roading.

    2. articles like that make me feel less homesick, which is not a good thing since I grew up under the Berlusconi regime.

    3. You would expect that boy racers like money being spent on more roads and ACC fees for cars going down.

      You can read more about his Subaru Legacy BH5 (which apparently under the bonnet it is effectively a WRX STi version 6) at http://chriswiggins.co.nz/hobbies or tweet him @chriswiggin3.

      1. Nice car (I have a soft spot for Subies from way back). However, it’s not what you’d call typical student daily transport… I doubt the average student could afford half the fuel bill for that car.

        Funny how the Herald insinuates that he is a typical student… and doesn’t allow comments on the article so people can’t call them on it.

        Then again, what else should we expect from the official newspaper of the SUV brigade?

      2. And i think he and his friends are going to be disappointed, last i heard on the topic motorbike levys aren’t going down.

  4. The sooner we get a new government the better. It is the only hope of anything changing for the better, for transport in Auckland.

  5. I don’t see the point of spending money on an SH18 to SH1 motorway link, if they plan to ruin it the same way that the SH20 to SH1 has been ruined with ramp signals – might as well just leave it the way it currently is.

    I was trying to drive Auckland to National Park a few weeks ago, and google maps suggested using SH20 instead of SH1 because of bad traffic, but in the end merging back with SH1 took longer than if I had just stayed on SH1.

    1. Indeed, the ramp signals there already run a lot of the time. Will they build a new flyover interchange only to put ramp signals on all the links?

    2. In response to the ramp metering, note the 4 laning of SH1 from SH20 to Hill Rd, and 3 laning to Takanini.
      The ramp metering was installed some time after the flyover was opened, in response to the traffic jam caused on SH1. What to expect when 2 lanes have to merge with an already clogged 3 lanes, which reduce to 2 lanes after the next offramp.

      Talking of future spending, Gerry Brownlee announced a CRL construction start date of 2020.
      The 2014 budget only contains estimates of spending to 2017/2018 http://www.budget.govt.nz/budget/pdfs/estimates/v1/est14-v1-trans.pdf
      Thus its no surprise there are no CRL spending details yet.
      Bringing the CRL forward to 2016 certainly would have been a surprise, given an earlier start date had conditions on patronage and CBD employment that haven’t been met yet.
      Any change of tack would only be as a last minute election bribe.

      1. Remind me what is the patronage target the motorway network had to meet before they brought forward this spending?

  6. $800 million, found at the drop of a hat.

    This must be what they think appeals to Auckland voters. (And to be fair, they poll extensively. It might. Or it might simply be ideological.)

    Whatever it is, it isn’t how we get an efficient transport system. National are locking us further into 20th century technologies, and stacking us with huge amounts of debt to do so.

    1. And arguably those “20th century technologies” were not even appropriate back then! They clearly sowed the seeds of the problems we have reaped ever since. And now our current govt is sowing more of the same seeds, in even larger quantity, and hoping for a different crop!

      1. What is it they say about repeating the same thing and expecting a different result being the definition of insanity…?

  7. But also seen the new money is a loan it is not on the books as expenditure and guess what? The 375m lent to NZTA to damage Auckland is exactly the same size as the ‘surplus’. So when is a surplus not a surplus? When there’s pointless roads to fund.

  8. Every time I read that we are building more roads in Auckland because of heavy freight movements I am stunned. But when someone tells me that we need to widen the Northern motorway for this reason then they are taking the urine.

    First of all a 50% increase on next to nothing is still next to nothing!

    But lets analyse what we make on the Shore. Starting at Devonport and Tim Finn makes music. In Takapuna Stephen Tindall makes significant contributions to charity. Milford, and they have made considerable noise about the negative aspects of high rise. Its not until we get to Browns Bay and the South African butcher that we have a product that requires anything like a truck to take it anywhere.

    Fess up Gerry. We are widening the Northern motorway because of Hobsonville Point and Oteha Valley and Millwater and etc. And it seems that none of them have anything particularly useful in terms of public transport connections.

    But congratulations to Nick Smith who has decided that building where there is infrastructure is sensible and so Takapuna has two significant projects – one by Northcote Road and the other in Lake Pupuke Drive I believe.

    And what about considering the old Fire Station, the Bruce Mason Centre (whose only function seems to be to drain Council resources) and the driving range at Akoranga station? I know it seems a contradiction after my comments re the Bruce Mason Centre but such intensification can only be good for the provision of amenities that generally follow such a change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *