Buses are often the quiet workhorse of many PT systems running all sorts of routes from high capacity busway systems down to local services that connect suburbs to shops or train stations. Yet for many, buses have anything but a quiet image, add in emissions and they are often thought of as noisy and smelly beasts. Modern buses with have managed to address most of these issues – or at least significantly reduce them however the negative perception remains.

In Auckland around 77% of all PT trips are made by bus and in the city centre about 32% of all people arriving in the CBD in morning peak are riding on one (trains are about 8%, cars 46%). As Jarrett Walker says, buses are like pedestrian fountains throwing people out into the city. We’ve talked many times before how the new bus network is a giant leap in the right direction for many reasons, one of which is that it uses buses much more efficiently. Despite this there will still need to be a lot of services travelling through the CBD as shown in the image below.

RPTP CBD network

The two concentrations of frequent east-west routes definitely look like they will need some bus serious priority to ensure they don’t all clog each other up, especially once less frequent and peak only services are added in. The image below is an example of what we need to avoid from Sydney. Future bus congestion is also a key reason why the CRL is so important as it allows more buses to act as feeders rather than having to trundle into town when that space could be better used for a bus from an area not served by the rain network.

Yet while it appears we are going to need some busways through the CBD, I’m also aware that the negative perceptions about buses mentioned above will continue to be raised. I’ve even heard it suggested by some that we ban buses from the inner core of the CBD with them only allowed around the edge i.e. Mayoral Dr. This would not only disadvantage bus passengers (probably putting many off) but would also likely disadvantage many retailers due to reduced pedestrian flows past their premises. These sorts of ideas aren’t just unique to the CBD though and seem to pop up from time to time in other places too.

I can’t help but wonder if perhaps the best solution is instead of pushing for buses to be removed from certain streets that those complaining instead push for the quality of buses to improve further benefiting everyone. What’s interesting is there appears to be quite a bit of innovation in buses going on at the moment, especially in electric buses that don’t substantial infrastructure like trolley wires. Below are three different trials in different cities of electric buses each using slightly different technology.

The first is from the UK where in the town of Milton Keynes where inductive charging is being used to keep the buses topped up during the day.

The fleet will run on the Number 7 route, which covers 25km (15 miles) between the Milton Keynes suburbs of Wolverton and Bletchley and carries an estimated 800,000 passengers a year.

After a night charging at the depot, the buses will receive booster charges throughout the day at the start and end of the route.

There, the bus parks over plates buried in the road. The driver then lowers receiver plates on the bottom of the bus to within 4cm of the road surface and the bus is charged for around 10 minutes before resuming service.

The system uses a process called inductive charging. Electricity passes through wire coils in the road plates, generating a magnetic field. This field induces a voltage across coils in the bus plates and the vehicle’s batteries are charged.

From memory this technology was first developed at Auckland Uni. Doing a 25km route all day also seems pretty impressive and assuming the bus is on time then a 10 minute charge at each end would simply be taking place while the bus was between runs so there is likely to be no passenger impact.

The second example comes from Zurich where a trial is under way using buses with batteries that can be topped up with flash charging in 15 seconds.

The system is designed to allow for quickly “topping off” batteries at , with a longer charge of just three to four minutes between bus runs. Buses are equipped with a laser controlled arm that sits atop the bus and automatically guides the contact mechanism to its mate in an overhanging . Passengers get on and off the bus just as they would any other bus.

The system was designed by  based electronics giant ABB with assistance from Geneva  and other city agencies. The TOSA system flash charges at a rate of 400 kW, allowing batteries to be topped off in just 15 seconds every few stops. Officials describing the system call it a truly zero- system because the electricity to recharge the buses is generated using hydroelectricity. They noted also that such a bus system would be a big improvement over conventional electric buses that get their power from overhead lines and also other battery run buses that must be taken out of service periodically for recharging. They claim also that despite such frequent recharging, the batteries in the buses are expected to last for at least a decade.

And here’s a promo video of it in action

And lastly from New York where a trial has just successfully completed on a battery powered bus from Chinese company BYD which is able to work all day on a single charge – although I guess it would greatly depend on how long the route was.

BYD and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) concluded a pilot test on a BYD 40-foot, zero-emissions, battery-electric bus.
The test period was from August 25 to October 25, totaling two months in service, with the final report data now summarized for distribution.

“The general purpose of the program was to evaluate how an electric bus could perform in New York City’s heavy traffic, whether the electric bus can meet the twin challenges of operating in the stop-and-go traffic of Manhattan while maintaining high levels of passenger comfort and operational performance,” said MTA’s spokesman Kevin Ortiz.

The bus tested at MTA was supplied by BYD Motors and offers a range of 140-155 miles average between charges. Charging is intended to only be completed at night during off peak hours to reduce unwanted demand on the grid, and takes only three to four hours to return to full capacity.

The testing was carried out on different routes throughout Manhattan, covering a total distance during the trial of 1,481 miles.

The BYD all-electric bus “performed excellent” covering more than 140 miles per full charge in heavy traffic, according to company officials.

There are probably other systems out there but that there does seem to be so many different options coming though does suggest trolley wire free electric buses are likely to play a big part in the future. We will probably have to wait to see which system ultimately ends up best but it’s definitely something we as a city should be thinking about.

So once again, perhaps instead of pushing for buses to be removed from certain areas due to noise and emissions that people should instead focus on how we can make them better. Over the medium term electric buses are likely to be much more successful in replacing the existing bus fleet than electric cars would be.

Share this

38 comments

  1. The ironic thing is that Auckland has already had electric buses. They were hybrid gas (turbine) electric vehicles, and ran smoothly on the old inner city run. They were

    Diesel buses fill our streets with noise and toxic pollution. It’s time that ended.

    1. Auckland used to have electric trolley buses to.
      Apparently those hybrid buses were very unreliable and taken out of service and have never been heard of since, I think I read somewhere they were converted to diesel buses.

      1. Last mention I could find of the fate of the hybrid electric buses was here, from 2012 – still waiting on diesel conversions at that time: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10811914 .

        From previous comments I saw on this site, it was quite a novel drivetrain design and when the turbines broke down, it was either difficult or too costly (for somebody’s tastes) to replace them, so they were pulled from service indefinitely.

        I caught them quite a few times and was impressed by the quietness – they did seem to struggle with the hills, but that may have largely been because they were on the then-free City Circuit run, typically packed out with students saving themselves the uphill walk from Queen Street to the University of Auckland… a bit of a slog for any bus around.

      2. I recall the trolley bus drivers all hitting the throttle simultaneously at 5am thereby tripping out the supply system. Good old union days! I’m not familiar with the maintenance requirements of the buses, however the DC system run by the AEPB (now Vector), being a mixture of rotating machines and mercury arc rectifiers, was obsolete even in the 80s (probably a carry-over from the trams). Wellington still has the problem of an obsolete DC supply system for their trolley buses.

  2. Professor John Boys and his team at AU have been developing inductive power transfer over many years. The next goal is to increase the gap, thereby eliminating the lowering mechanism.

  3. Aren’t the new routemasters in London hybrid electric?

    Would be interesting to see if these could be configured to run electric in the city, with the engine running only while driving at speed (ie crossing the bridge for shore busses.

  4. That BYD bus is interesting, it has a range of 140 miles per “charge”, yet the trial covered only 1400 miles or so, that means either the daily runs it was made to do were very short (meaning that 140 miles range is way more than sufficient), or they only ran it in a trial for 10-20 days of testing over the 2 months testing period.

    And surely you don’t actually need every bus to be able to “spot” or “flash” charge , many buses are currently (no pun intended) used twice a day – AM peak and PM peak.
    I know the plan is to maximise off-peak travel as well to smooth the operations, which is good, but right now the most expensive operational part of the bus (the driver) is only working like this,

    So perhaps initially even some buses (the BYD one for example) that have enough battery capacity so that they can easily do an AM or PM peak only with a 4-5 hour “recharge break” – along with the driver 🙂 between peaks would be a good stepping stone while the full non-FF fuel option is developed further. The BYD bus says it can re-charge in 3 hours, ideal for the between-peak layover.

    It is fair to say that all these electric technologies will be totally different and much more mature in 10 years, and even 5 from now (when the CRL build is hopefully in full steam) and reayd to come online.

    One thing is certain, fossil fuel powered buses are only going to get more expensive to operate in the future, that can be safely predicted,
    No matter what Oil Trader Northcote Phil may say. So even if the US is totally fracked it won’t help NZ Inc much, unless we want to import LNG to run the buses on.

    So, yes, I think electric buses (or at least Electric/.FF hybrid buses) have a big part to play in the CBD in the medium term future.

    It would be a fitting tribute of sorts if Auckland could see a return of electric buses (for at least a trial) by 2016 – some 60 years after the last electric mass transit system was switched off.

    It would help transition Auckland away from 20th century car centric thinking – “personal mobility is best”- to a more nuanced, transport policy that is wider thinking and factors in both the public and the private cost and benefits so is along the lines that “public mobility is best”.

  5. That test is in Geneva, not Zurich. However, still something Auckland should be trialling. What are publicly owned transport authorities able to test these out anywhere in the world except in NZ?

    AT – get a trial going here!

    1. All the bus operators are privately owned so they will only do a trail once the technology is viable. Refer above regarding the gas turbine/electric hybrid trial which was terminated because the technology was not fully developed. Likewise Designline was put into receivership as the costs of its ‘hybrid technology exceeded the profitable coachmaking part of the business.

      Unless the trail is linked to a local university etc which owns the technology, and would reap the rewards of its development, any trial is not sensible use of private or public funds. IN this case, being a freeloader and relying on other cities trials is the best option.

      1. What, do you mean like the University of Auckland which owns several induction charging patents and has extensive research in that field?

        1. And has spun that out into PowerbyProxi which is focusing on the smaller consumer electronics market? http://powerbyproxi.com/

          But yes, If PowerbyProxi wanted to do a trial on buses, it should pay for it as it would own the IP derived from that trial that it could then sell to the world. It is not something rate payers, or private bus operators should be paying for.

  6. You would be able to do a 5 minute charge at most Auckland bus stops by the time everyone gets on and pays with a $20 note and the driver presses 25 buttons on his console to print the ticket 😉

  7. I wonder if you could have massive battery packs at the depot and a guy with a forklift that swaps out batteries. That way one battery pack would only need to last for one return journey, and could be charged up while the bus is doing the next journey.

  8. These electric buses are quite exciting if they work as advertised, and the batteries don’t deteriorate over time. Does anyone have a figure for the number of kilometers a day that a bus on a busy route travels in Auckland? It’s hard to come up with a ball-park figure since buses generally don’t drive fast, they stop a lot, and have built in pauses at the end of routes.

    Greg N mentions LNG. CNG and LPG were all the rage in the 1980s, and I remember the exhausts of these vehicles had a distinctive spell. I presume the technology died out when the 1980s equivalent of peak oil panic ended. But when did the converter kit installers shut up shop, and the garages decomission their CNG and LPG infrastructure?

    1. I have found out before and seem to remember it being about 100-120km-ish so those Chinese buses with the 150km range would be fine for most services probided the battery life wasn’t like a cellphone/laptops (terrible after 1-2 years).

      I wonder if there were be any infrastructure issues. Charging 100 buses (what is the average bus depot size?) over a 3-4 hour period from say 1am to 5am would be a big draw of current. Sure power prices would be cheap at that time of night but the transmission systems might not cope that well depending on where the bus depots are. It may require Vector to upgrade the lines in that area which no doubt they would ask for a contribution for.

    2. You have some peak buses that only do a couple of runs a day, but for one in service all day it could be more like 300km, more on busways.

      Batteries will deteriorate over time of course, but that needn’t be a stumbling block. ICE bus engines and other components likewise deteriorate over time and need servicing or replacement. If a bus needs a new battery every few years you simply have to run the numbers on that as an operating expense.

  9. I think even before these new technologies become more commercially viable, we can start by improving our existing diesel bus purchases.

    NZ Bus has some buses (originally bought for Mt Eden Rd I believe) which are surprisingly quite both inside and out despite being diesel. They’re also well laid out inside, reasonably smooth ride, and feel quite “tram-like”. I believe their fleet numbers are in the 2200s (these are not the buses with the “bubble” fronts and definitely NOT their latest purchase ADL buses which feel cramped inside and seem surprisingly loud – the engine noise in those ones gives me a headache). Birkenhead Transport and H&E have a couple too. I think they’re Designline builds.

    So even more better quality diesel buses (and again I do not consider the ADLs as good examples) would go some way to improving noise (and comfort) issues.

    1. The buses are continually getting updated. I think MAN is no longer importing Euro 5 so all new MAN buses will be Euro 6. Likewise, the gearboxes are being improved – previously manuals, they are all autos now and the number of gears, and the smoothness of the gear change is improving). However, those buses stay in service for 20 years* so while there is continual purchases, the old ones dont necessarily get disposed as the fleet sizes are increasing as demand increases.

      * the buses last much longer than 20 years but I think to win a contract from AT, the buses used on the service have to be less than 20 years old, and a minimum Euro 2. Anything older than this is only used for school run’s or moved/sold out of Auckland where the requirements aren’t as strict.

      1. I disagree. Some of the Scania “bubble” buses, and also ADL buses in particular, seem to have terrible gearboxes – changing gears is quite noticeably jerky. Some (not all) of the bubble buses also seem to have rough brakes, starting and stopping is rough.

        Whether a bus is a smooth and comfortable ride or not in Auckland doesn’t seem to correlate with the bus’ age.

        1. I never used the term “Improvement” and “ADL” in the same sentence, let alone post. I think the next generation of gearbox are only just starting to be purchased.

          Likewise I didn’t mention brakes in my post, but not being a bus driver I have no idea whether your, and everyone elses, complaints are technology or user issues.

        2. Ratepayers forked out for the hybrids. The former Auckland Regional Transport Authority gave $786,000 and the old council $40,000 in the service’s last year alone. The buses cost $560,000 each when bought in 2003.
          http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10811914

          This is why Auckland Transport should not be involved in any trial. The buses cost significantly more than a deisel, yet the technology was unproven and ultimately had to be scrapped.

        3. “Whether a bus is a smooth and comfortable ride or not in Auckland doesn’t seem to correlate with the bus’ age.”

          I remember the mid-80s (or possibly later?) MAN buses that used to do Auckland runs as late as 2004 or 2005 – the very square ones with curved smoked glass dividers at the front and heavily padded cloth seats. Even at 20-odd years old they were smoother and more comfortable than anything else in service and even 10 years later I don’t think they have been beaten by anything we have now. What happened when they were bought, and how do we make it happen again?

        4. I recall those, very slow off the mark (frustratingly slow up Khyber Pass) but otherwise roomy and comfortable with wide doors and there is still a few bendy bus examples in the fleet. They replaced some of the 0305 Mercedes and those Merc’s I reckon were the high tide mark in Auckland buses.

          Electric buses make a lot of sense as opposed to hybrids, quiet and zero emissions, with standard electric simplicity and reliability but I do think the trolley bus is the one that will over all last the longest and be the most reliable but be the one with the highest start up cost.

      2. “they are all autos now and the number of gears, and the smoothness of the gear change is improving”

        Presumably electric buses wouldn’t need gear boxes, and therefore the ride would be very smooth?

  10. Interesting post Matt. I rode on the trolley buses when I was a kid, they made noise but nowhere near what diesel buses do. I think Wellington actually bought a heap of them from Auckland when they were decommissioned. My favourite part about the trolleys in Wellington is the smell of burnt toast you get sometimes. The ARA tried out ethanol in the early 80’s which was before sustainability was an issue but fuel self sufficiency was important. I think it was a success but killed off by the decrease in fuel costs.

    1. Thanks for posting that link James. I was down at Whaka last week and didn’t notice these, so they may be decommissioned. They would have been a fairly early generation.

  11. I did a feasibility study on an IPT bus using Vanadium Redox Batteries in my final year engineering project. The gist of it was that you could run a bus fully loaded 24/7 on the Link route with just 10 mins of charging for each loop. You could reduce that charge time by having more IPT charge spots. Let me know if you want to see the report.

  12. Surely the electric motors are only required in a congested area like Britomart or when a cluster of buses occurs – a single bus isn’t a problem but a queue of them, jockeying for position at a stop, is extremely unpleasant to be around..that’s when the electric motors would be useful.
    I would also like to see a ban on buses idling at stops (ie, for more than a minute). When you see a bus idling for 5 mins, is that so the A/C can run?

  13. The report on how great the electric buses are , read what has happened in the US, a total failure.Batteries run out much sooner than claimed breakdown regularly cant climb hilly roads can only be used on very favourable runs.
    Councils seem to lack any knowledge on such a subject,suppose is the accountants who get all the say, given they have little knowledge of how these things work so go for the lemons.

    1. Can’t climb hilly routes? Really?

      Battery electric double deckers are in use in Wellington up ~200m high hills.

      I’m guessing you haven’t heard of opportunity charging either.

      Methinks some of your facts are out of date …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *