We’ve talked before about how we seem to be seeing a resurgence of higher density developments being proposed as developers and their financiers start to come out of hibernation following the GFC. As a reminder, here are some of the ones we have previously talked about (some are already under construction):
City Fringe: Urba – Apartment building replacing a low rise office
New Lynn: Merchant Quarter Condominiums – 10 levels of apartments above a new car parking building and medical clinic development right next to the train station.
Manukau: M Central – The conversion of an existing office building (ex IRD) to apartments and retail
City: Sugartree – A series of apartment buildings being developed around Cook and Nelson St.
City: 132 Vincent St – Another office conversion
Grey Lynn: The Isaac – A lower rise development (four stories) that is already well under construction.
Orakei: Orakei Village – A series of town houses and retail on Orakei point above the rail station.
More and more seem to be starting to pop up which is great – although it’s worth noting most of these are high rise developments, not the low to mid rise type of intensification we are talking about the Unitary plan needing.
Another new development being proposed is being called Club Life Victoria. This development has caught my attention simply because of the market it is targeting which is a group that has not traditionally been associated with city living.
Club life is a brand new concept in living for people over fifty. It’s cool, it’s revolutionary and it’s affordable. With Club Life you get fantastic facilities to enhance a great lifestyle with a freehold unit title for your new property. Best of all, the purchase prices are very competitive when compared to other new urban living offerings in Auckland. Next best is that the on-going costs are remarkably low considering the ownership and amazing lifestyle services and facilities provided. You are always in control, and own any and all capital growth on re-sale.
They also say this
You’re a baby boomer, empty nester who lives an interesting life, has contemporary tastes, loves to socialise, go to shows, travel and have lots of fun……or want to.
One thing you know for sure is you don’t want to stick to the traditional lifestyle offerings ……so boring!
Club Life is here to put the whole current development model the other way around. Your needs first and a well planned development to meet those needs.
The pictures below give you a flavor of the mood of what we are doing but do not show an actual Club Life.
The architecture of the inaugural club life will be shown at your presentation.
Join those who want to be part of this new baby boomer lifestyle solution.
To me it sounds like a kind of retirement village in the city but obviously the developer sees a bit of a market here which does go to show that dwelling preferences aren’t as black and white as many anti intensification types like to make out. From what I can tell the building is out on the western edge of the CBD, on the corner of Sam Wrigley St and Union St. With more and more developments happening out that way, it will hopefully become even more necessary to upgrade the current traffic sewers that are Nelson and Hobson St to provide better access to the rest of the CBD.
I wonder if we will see any other apartments targeting baby boomers starting to pop up? It would certainly be good to have apartments that appeal to a wider demographic to help improve people’s perceptions of them and in that regard this is a positive step.
Another development by the same developers is also being advertised on the city fringe in Saint Benedict St called The Saint. This is a lower rise apartment but looks pretty nice from the pictures and is a good example of the kind of dwellings that would look great in many town centres under the Unitary Plan. This is particularly interesting as I think the area will boom in the next decade or so as there will be a CRL station just around the corner.
Neither of these developments would fall into the affordable category but I think it is important to point out that not everything does. What is important is that if they are built they increase the number of dwellings in the city and help to provide a greater level of choice. They also represent a positive sign that the apartment development market is heating up and that is something incredibly important for Auckland’s future. Of course whether banks will actually start lending money on apartments in the same way they do with standalone houses is a different matter entirely.



Processing...
The Saint looks terrific and St Benedicts St is quiet but still close to everything you might want. The apartment building for baby boomers is the best idea I have heard of. Can we lock them in?
Don’t think those are the baby boomers we need to be locking up. It’s the ones in power that are trying to force their preferences on all of Auckland we need to be preventing.
Good to see also the obligatory Audi out front, along with alluring young woman in obligatory flimsy top, and obligatory wilding flowering jacaranda trees sprouting from solid concrete pavement. Hooray!
I like the cartoon character coming out of the carpark.
Re: Sugartree, has any actual site work begun yet?,
They were promising demolition in 2012, but Homebase still appear to be going strong on the site?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10830375
Yeah site work for the Sugartree development has begun. I work on Union St and the building next door to us was demolished last month to make way for Stage 1. I don’t think the sites required for stages 2 and 3 have been demolished yet.
At least there is still plenty of scope for this sort of development in the CBD..
This a great demographic because:
a) it dispels the myth amongst the anti-intensification brigade that only students and poor people want to live in the city and/or high/medium density, and
b) if my parents are anything to go by, these people spend a fair bit on eating and drinking out, so pubs/cafes/restuarants (existing and potential) will do well, thereby changing the nature of the surrounds
Well the CBD is going to have to go up because little growth is possible pretty much anywhere else under the UP… And if I’m right in picking that the attraction has passed for tract housing out on the fringes, not least of course because of higher transport costs, but also because of a change in the zietgeist, then stand by for more.
Also Alan Erenhart in his excellent The Great Inversion showed that in the US the cohorts that are choosing inner city living are the younger adults [no surprise] but also downsizing Baby Boomer empty nesters. Smart move by the developer. Of course many of these people have a bach or a boat so a suburban garden is both less rewarding and more hassle than their other lifestyle options.
These people won’t be intensifying in the the only areas to allow it: out west.
Re New Lynn’s Merchant Quarter Condominiums; 10 levels of apartments aren’t ‘being proposed’ – there is a big-ass crane out my office window building them at the moment. They’re currently about three floors up! (as in floors above the car park building).
Yes I know that one is under construction which is why I said some where under construction already. The list was copy and pasted from a previous post but have updated to remove the “proposed” part
I think some of the issue with “encouraging” people (baby boomers or others) into apartments, is a lack of well-compiled information about the pros and cons of apartment living. There are many issues to be aware of when buying or moving into shared accommodation – how a body corporate works, what your BC fees do and don’t include, who looks after the rubbish, noise etc. Having given up the 1/4 acre section a number of years ago, I’m totally sold on apartment living but there are some seriously bad designs and operators out there. Hopefully the recent changes to the Body Corp rules will help, but the Council needs to take a role in design issues. While projects like the Isaac sound great on paper, having driven past recently it looks like a number of the apartments don’t get any direct sunlight. Trying to get people who are used to single-level, full-window living into shared spaces with no sun won’t be easy.
Well the proof of the pudding is in the eating, we shall see soon enough how difficult it is to get people into projects like the Isaac. My guess is it will be fully sold well before construction is completed and fully occupied from then on.
I agree, especially since there are plenty of houses nearby which get very little sun in the winter. The Isaac is on a ridge, so should be warm and dry compared to places down towards the motorway. I’d say being on a ridge/hill is a big drawcard in Auckland. Also, walkable to Grey Lynn, West Lynn, etc. If I was looking to buy at the moment I’d definitely be interested (although the included carparks annoy me).
Well there demand is there, Urba on the top of Howe Street off K’Rd has been brought forward by 9 months IIRC because of how quickly they sold. So there appears to be absolutely no problem convincing sufficiently large numbers of people to buy an apartment, in fact there appears to be far more people wanting to buy one than there are ones available.
Anectdata, but my observation is the Urba selling well @ $450-500k for 2 bed, The Isaac struggling @ $700k+ for 2 bed.
The Saint is an interesting one, priced closer to The Isaac by the looks.
Ah just saw this comment. Is that because it’s Ponsonby-ish pricing? That does seem a lot for an apartment in that area, but then again I have no experience of apt pricing. Maybe if they hadn’t included all those carparks, haha.
Critically just on the wrong side of the road… and yes, awash with parking that’s gotta be paid for.
Whereas Urba come with around 10 carparks IIRC, so presumably that side of Howe Street is within the CBD zone with no MPRs.
The Isaac or the Saint is on the wrong side of the road? Sorry, am losing the thread of the conversation slightly.
I agree with the comments on body corporates. I have just been through the whole exercise and looked at apartments versus terrace versus house and came to the conclusion that apartments are great if you are renting one and lousy to own. The problem is that members of the body corp don’t have the same objective, some live there and want to add value, some want to maintain the status quo and some want to minimise expenses to maximise short term profit so vote to defer work and leave a mess for the next owner. When you buy a house there are usually only one or two owners and they have the same goal. You choose how much you will spend on maintenance and when you will spend it. More than any other factor I think this puts people off owning an apartment.
“some want to maintain the status quo and some want to minimise expenses to maximise short term profit so vote to defer work and leave a mess for the next owner” – Sorry are you talking about BCs or NIMBYs and the Unitary Plan? Could apply to both. 🙂
A few more I’ve started to see marketing themselves:
Queens Residences – A couple of towers just off Queen Street.
88 Broadway – Looks like its being built over the railway lines on the “gap” on Broadway where the Western Line intersects with the Southern Line.
Shoji – Boutique apartment complex of 12 in the Vinegar Lane development.
Yes I have more info coming on 88 broadway soon
Just signed up for one! Hope your new info vindicates my hasty decision 😉 But regardless, I love the concept of living in the heart of the town centre with covered access to the station. Agree with one of the comments above on the carparking though – this development includes an absolutely massive and pointless parking garage, yet it’s right next door to a parking building (with another one over the road). Stupid.
Linz, let us know if you start to develop any psychological problems from not having a feijoa tree on your property. Other posters have identified this as a major issue in the debate on housing in Auckland. I am sure you will agree that this is certainly a major consideration in making your housing choice.
What kind of commie would want to stand by and let other people move into homes without a feijoa tree?
Haha will book the therapist in anticipation 🙂
If you’ve been in Auckland long enough, you certainly don’t need a feijoa tree on your property – you’ll know EXACTLY which streets have them planted on the verges, free for the taking 😉
Also Soto at the bottom of Liverpool St. See http://www.soto.net.nz
There are quite a few on the shore too.
Apollo Square, The Grove, Norfolk Apartments, and the ones on Library Lane in Albany Village.
I’m confident that unless the crazy anti-urban planning regs forbid intensification or make it financially impossible that the market will deliver it to meet a rising demand in the years ahead in Auckland.
Now, about the necessary Transit System and walking and cycling amenity….
COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, FASCISM, FORCING CHANGE, HATING HERITAGE, LET THE MARKET DECIDE!!!!!!!!!
Wow. Someone needs to chill out…
Don’t worry, he’s being sarcastic.
Sorry, the internet NEEDS a sarcasm font.
Sailor Boy, you know you shouldnt read the NZ Herald – it messes with your mind!
And you know that NIMBYs only want the market to decide if it means they get the sprawling city they want. If it delivers apartments then it is back to socialist regulation like minimum lot sizesand minimum parking.
Also Vinegar Lane aka the old Soho pit.
Quite like the Orakei apartments too, but they are far far beyond most Aucklanders I think they start in the late $700,000s….
There’s also apartments at 28 Balfour Ave in Parnell that are almost built and will be for sale shortly (there was no selling off plans).