I like to play around with ideas for dream future rail systems for Auckland, and oddly enough sometimes my rail visions are embraced by those with some opportunity to make them into a reality. But aside from making for interesting discussion points, having a bit of a think about what we might want our public transport system to look like 20, 30 or even 40 years into the future is important for one simple reason.

Future proofing.

At the moment, or over the next few months, a lot of thought will be put into the detailed design of Auckland’s CBD rail tunnel. We might also have analysis undertaken for rail options to Auckland Airport and rail to the North Shore. The consenting process for the Waterview Connection may also raise questions over whether we should have a long-term vision for rapid transit to northwest Auckland, while questions are also likely to be asked over whether AMETI really provides for the southeast rapid transit line that is so desperately needed. As each of these projects are designed, planned or even studied in a highly preliminary way I think it’s important that we think about how future improvements to the system might tie into what we’re focusing on in the here and now.

For example, when the detailed design of the Midtown railway station is being undertaken, I sincerely hope that thought goes into how a future North Shore line might link in with the system. Would it bypass the tunnel completely – instead running as an east-west tunnel across the city (much like this option), or would it somehow link into the CBD tunnel?  If it links in with the tunnel, should that link be at Britomart or up near Midtown? These are decisions that will need to be made incredibly soon (if not made already) and they will have a huge impact on how that future North Shore Line functions – when it eventually is constructed (which is likely to be decades away).

Furthermore, we must keep in mind that Auckland’s population is projected to keep growing at a pretty quick pace over the next 40 years. One of the most interesting graphs that I plucked from a recent ARTA presentation related to Auckland’s future population growth and how that stacks up against New Zealand’s growth as a whole:

These graphs show what is a quite staggering observation: that between 2006 and 2051 Auckland’s population will grow by three times as much as the rest of New Zealand put together. In numbers terms, around 1 million extra people will live in Auckland, while the whole of the rest of the country will only experience population growth of around 330,000. If there was ever a good argument for Auckland getting a significantly larger slice of the “new infrastructure pie” than we get at the moment, then this data is that argument.

Added to the simple fact that Auckland’s population will grow hugely over the next 40 years are other long-term trends like dramatically higher petrol prices and the need to reduce CO2 emissions (both from transport and generally from our cities by making them more energy efficient). All of this points towards Auckland in 2050 needing a significantly more comprehensive public transport system than it has today.

So what might that system look like? Well I’ve had a bit of a crack at it – with the map below showing the heavy rail (coloured lines) and light-rail/busway (black lines) that could make up the backbone of Auckland’s public transport system in 2050 (obviously along with a lots of buses and ferries):

There are four main railway lines, seven light-rail lines and one busway. The major addition from past maps is the Westgate branch of what I’ve called the “Westgate-Botany Line”, the red one. This line could effectively run down one side of State Highway 16 fairly easily, and offer a very high speed commuting option for those living in parts of west and northwest Auckland that currently aren’t served by the western line. In the shorter term, it could be a busway.

Many of the light-rail lines follow routes that at the moment have high-frequency buses. It’s possible that other light-rail lines could be introduced – such as along Sandringham Road – but I would think these are the main ones to start with. They would often act as feeders to the core heavy rail routes, but could in other areas provide the capacity necessary to shift a big chunk of the 2.3 million Aucklanders that will inhabit the city by then.

Of course a system like this is just a dream for now. But if we do need these lines in the future then we need to start thinking about making sure we don’t stuff up alignments by not future-proofing in projects we complete in the nearer future. Plus, it’s always good to have a system with many parts that need ‘completing’. The motorway network has had billions spent on it in recent years in order to ‘complete it’. Why not think long term about rail too?

Updated: Map updated with some of the suggestions made incorporated. Still far from a finished product.

Share this

31 comments

  1. Regarding using Strand station for intercity trains: wouldn’t Strand have to be served by the green line, rather than the red?

    1. Good point. I think I was trying to show that the Strand station would connect to inter-city trains, rather than them going via the red line.

      Inter-city trains probably should go: Papakura-Airport-Newmarket-Strand.

  2. The map ignores the existing Waiuku and Mission Bush Branches ( now restored back into Waiuku township ) that could provide significant room for urban sprawl as well as train based weekend holiday destination.

    A feeder service using (light) rail cars could traverse from Tuakau – Pukekohe – Paerata – Dury – Pakakura – Dury – Pareata – Glenbrook – Mauku – Waikuku and back for much less outlay than laying new track, and run at much less expense than providing a bus service.

  3. The Henderson-Lincoln Rd light rail line – if you can run it past Lincoln Rd to Westgate (tram-train technology?), then you net out one transfer in terms of the “Upper Harbour” services between Henderson and Albany.

  4. Brilliant. Congratulations. You have just completed the Auckland Spatial Plan, 8 months ahead of schedule, and for significantly less money. Why does it take a blogger (no disrespect – an expert blogger) to show such vision and clear thinking!
    All you need now are policies that really encourage intensity around each “station/stop”, limit car parking around each stop (unless park and ride for some outlying stops) BUT most importantly, polices that stop any large trip generating use outside of any of these stops. That’s how we will raise land value around the stops and make this happen.

  5. If the government gets its way and forces Auckland to have 20 years worth of greenfields land to develop then it could be quite good to focus it on the north/northwest part of region rather than the southeast. Doing so could be quite easy by allowing development around the busway between Albany and Orewa as well as extending the ‘Westgate Line’ further. Ideally I think the Westgate line should be extended to Huapai.

    I would also have a light rail/busway from Panmure to Botany Town Centre via Ti Rakau Dr.

  6. I agree with Matt L. Westgate line should extend to Huapai. Also the West Harbour/Hobsonville area will be another Flat Bush unless some rapid transport is added out there. Ferries are good, but wont cope with the demand

  7. Brilliant map Josh. A graphical format like this makes it all so much more tangible and, hopefully, achievable. It also lays the foundation for the secondary layer of QTN feeder bus services.

    On the Botany Line, even though there is a common perception that it can be a busway first and light rail later, I think there is a big advantage in being bold and stating light rail from the outset. It isn’t as easy as it might sound to replace a busway with light rail, and the disruption during construction would be quite large. It would also mean that the ultimate light rail solution is implemented much later as there will be a perceived need to get the most value from the busway, as we are seeing on the Northern Busway at the moment.

  8. Lovely work Admin. It does make Midtown even busier and bigger than Britomart…. little chance of any future proofing for that I suspect. Are you sure that Nick’s point of keeping Britomart for inter city services isn’t a better fix than the Strand though? A station there didn’t work before, and surely arriving in the city to a bespoke diesel ready station is preferable. Nick’s Quay St plan is so much more future proofed and [probably] buildible…? Especially with the changes in Hamilton and Auckland at the political level make the rebirth of intercity services look nearer than before.

    Didn’t look like any room for triple tracking in that Ameti visual either…. Failure to future proof is active policy, it is a way of preventing any of these schemes form happening. Then the rejection of them can described as ‘a technical matter’.

  9. If you’re taking the red line from the Strand direct to Midtown it raises the possibility of a University Station….? it would be deep though. A cheaper route would be Customs and then up Albert St with the Loop, with parallel platforms under Customs St for Britomart…?

    Midtown becomes more important than Britomart with this scheme, let’s plan for that possibility.

    Nice work, Admin

  10. Are sure Nick’s plan to retain Britomart as the intercity terminal isn’t better? It is a bespoke diesel ready terminal in an ideal location. The Strand didn’t work before. His idea of adding two new platforms under Quay St for the CBD lines does add twice the capacity which will clearly be needed for this plan…

    With the recent changes in Hamilton and Auckland councils the return of intercity services already looks a lot closer.

    The failure to plan ahead for transit is a way of preventing it; opposition to it then becomes ‘a technical matter’.

    1. I agree. The prestige of arriving in the center of town is worth a lot. Its one of the main advantages rail has over air travel. The strand is an inferior option.

  11. Thanks Patrick, but this network would would much the same regardless of where the terminal is.

    Admin, a couple of thoughts:
    -Would the Orange line not stop at The Strand too?
    -If you have an ‘ithsmus loop line’ the interchange with the western would be at Mt Albert, not Avondale.
    -Do you not think the T5 + B1 warrant being a railway themselves? It would be particularly handy for freight running north too (assuming the northern line is extended the few km past Orewa to join the NAL.
    -Perhaps more than one line on The Shore? With 20+ tphpd through the harbour tunnel they would be capacity for two or three Shore lines.
    – There seems to be a lack of lateral connections in the west, you have to come all the way to midtown then out again to transfer. One solution to this would be a tramway on the Balmoral Rd ring road, from Western Springs to Morningside, DOminion Rd, Greenlane, Remuera Rd to Orakei.
    Another alternative would be to extend the ithmus loop line from Mt Albert to Pt Chevalier (via Unitec), and have it run via the Northwestern line instead of the Western.

    I agree it makes sense for the Northwestern rail to be the main out out to Kumeu and beyond, it would be a pretty much straight fast line into the city, and would have only six or seven intermediate stops vs. about 16 on the western. Only issue would be that it runs into a city tunnel so the wires would have to go out to Helensville.

    1. Good points Nick – working on updating it right now actually. The biggest problem is that I have three services in the CBD tunnel between Newton and Midtown, and that tunnel probably only has capacity for two services. Yet if I sent the Airport-North Shore via Parnell instead – then we have nothing serving Grafton.

      Orange Line could stop at the Strand. Yeah good point about Mt Albert. In terms of a northwest railway line, I remain unconvinced whether that’s necessary – although I guess if we’re talking about a 2050 system – why the heck not!

      I agree about a crosstown light-rail route. Either Mt Albert Road or Balmoral Road would make sense.

      1. I just uploaded my own version:
        http://greaterakl.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Mega-network.gif

        It’s based on the assumption that each coloured route runs at ten minute headways, and that a double track line could support three such routes. The only section with more than three lines is through Britomart, so I’ve assumed that either the CBD tunnel and/or the North Shore tunnel run through to Quay Park on their own tracks.
        I didn’t show it but this assumes a third track for freight from the Port to Southdown and to Papakura, which is also used at peak by intercity trains. The northern freight route runs via the ASL and the upper harbour line.

        1. Nice stuff Nick. You should make a post of it. If there is ever a time to be looking at this kind of thing, now is that time.

  12. I think a direct CBD – Takapuna line needs to added.
    Takapuna is the only major node that lacks a direct service to the CBD.
    One way could be to fill in the missing link in the light rail between Onewa and Smales Farm so then T2 could extend from the CBD to Devonport. This however would not give to much journey time improvement.
    A better way would be to build a tunnel of the North Shore line to the Takapuna CBD. Shouldnt be too expensive only 1.5km of tunnel needed could be cut and cover under Anzac Ave.
    This would give a journey time of under 10mins, imagine being able to go to Takapuna during your lunch-break!
    This issue would be where to terminate this line, maybe going through the CBD – Newmarket and then terminating at Parnell as this wouldnt be too busy with only one line going through there.

    As an aside would be interested to know which programme you recommend to draw your maps?

    1. Maybe just divert the North Shore line to go via Takapuna in a tunnel and abandon Akoranga bus station as the main rapid transit stop in the area.

      I use Adobr Photoshop, I think Nick uses Illustrator which I’ve tried and failed to get my head around.

  13. Would you really want a light rail line across the too? Why not just terminate it at Onewa station?
    Also wouldn’t you like a light rail up/ down Queen St?

  14. A stub from Akoranga to Takapuna of about 1300m would be fairly straightfoward, a la the Manukau Branch. It would need a short at grade extension, an underpass of Barrys Point, a low level bridge across the estury and a few hundred metres of cut and cover to a station in the centre of Taka.

    Having Taka on the main line would be much more difficult as you would need basically a big loop away from the corriodor and back again, pretty much all in tunnel. Thats about 3.5km on the most direct route and more like 6km if you want a nice smooth alignment. It could end up costing as much as the CBD tunnel!

    Admins, Illustrator is very useful for this sort of thing once you get the hang of it, as each line or label or whatever stays as a separate object you can move them, reshape, recolour them etc. It is best to use the pen tool and draw lines by marking the corners or ends. You can then grab a corner and pull it to make curves.

    Paint.net is a good free piece of software, almost as powerful as Photoshop. Microsoft Visio actually has a metro map template if you can find a copy on a work or school computer.

    1. A 2.5km bored tunnel from the NW motorway corridor to meet the North Shore tunnel in the vicinity of Victoria park, to share the city approach and platforms with the shore line.. The tunnel portal would be at the start of the Arch Hill Scenic Reserve, basically straight into the side of the cliff. The first station would be under Grey Lynn shops only 150m or so into the tunnel. Ponsonby station under Ponsonby Rd somewhere between Richmond and Franklin Rd, with another near Victoria Park Market. This would be a very expensive link, and probably the last to be built.

      A first stage could be to build the NW line as far as Western Springs, then have a 900m long dog leg in a trench in the median of St Lukes Rd to join to the western line. This bit would later be used to run the ithsmus loop line.

  15. Ponsonby is much more a corridor than a node so would be much better served by a light rail line running round from Newton to Britomart down Ponsonby Road. The Dominion Road tram should also run through Newton.
    Light-rail running up a pedestrianised Queen St would be preferable, I know this would duplicate the CBD tunnel but Queen St is much more central.

  16. Hi,

    I want to let you know that I’ve been impressed by the quality and depth of your site’s content.

    I’m reaching out to see if you’re open link exchanges with high DR websites.

    Let me know what you think!

    P.S. If you’re not the right person, could you please share this with the right one

    Best,
    Mary Miller

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *