An interesting article appeared in the Dominion Post today, and is also on the “Stuff” website, raising the question of whether Auckland’s public transport system will be able to cope with the influx of visitors expected for the 2011 Rugby World Cup. The article quotes a July 2009 ARTA report, which raised some serious issues and problems, stating that with expected public transport demand during the RWC being four times what is typical, the system would not be able to cope. Here’s the full article:

Auckland is not ready to cope with tens of thousands of international visitors set to flood the city for the 2011 Rugby World Cup, a report reveals.

Transport Minister Steven Joyce and Auckland Mayor John Banks say they are confident the city will be prepared, but a draft transport strategy released under the Official Information Act shows transport planners are worried.

The Auckland Regional Transport Authority report, written last July, warned of complacency over demand for services.

“During presentations and meetings with decision-makers an attitude of `this is a small increase in business as usual’ has been encountered,” the report says.

“The levels of patron movement and operational standard [needed for the RWC] are in reality significantly above what is currently delivered.”

The cup is the third-biggest sporting event in the world and is expected to attract a television audience of up to four billion, plus 60,000 overseas visitors.

The influx of visitors would place more than four times the demand on public transport than Auckland had seen before.

“In a number of areas there are limited people who are able to perform tasks that are either needed, or may be needed,” the report said.

Nearly 2km of roadside parking had to be found around Eden Park for 130 buses and the entire fleet of 38 Auckland trains would be needed on match days.

Mr Joyce said last night the report showed there was “considerable work to do”, but good progress had been made since the report was written.

“There are a number of organisations with a lot of skin in this game, the Government not the least one, so I think everybody is pretty focused.”

Mr Banks said $58 millon was being spent on the Eden Park precinct and thousands were expected to walk from the central city well ahead of game kick-offs.

It would take about 30 minutes to walk to the ground from a central city hotel with widened footpaths and improved signs.

“It’d be a great walk.”

It seems to me as though there are two ways of looking at this – either from an optimistic point of view that we’ll “manage to get by”, or a pessimistic point of view that “it’ll be a total disaster”. At the moment I am probably sitting on the fence, and I think there’s probably a fairly even chance of either of those two outcomes happening.

Which is the problem really. It would be pretty terrible PR for the whole country if our train system was to grind to a halt just before the World Cup Final, with thousands of people potentially not being able to get to the seats they’ve paid thousands of dollars for… and so forth. Yet it seems to me as though there’s a reasonable chance that might happen, as at the moment we have regular signalling and points failures on the rail system – and that’s without the huge pressure that will be placed on it by having four times the number of people using public transport compared to normal.

So what’s the real problem here, and what could be done over the next 18 months to sort it out?

There are a few aspects of this mess which we can’t really do anything about now, as it’s too late. This includes having electrification ready for the World Cup, which should really have been the number one priority, but somehow ended up below the Mangere Bridge duplication (somewhat understandable), the Victoria Park Tunnel (useful if tourists somehow bring their cars with them on the plane) and the Newmarket viaduct replacement on the priority list. Up until early last year it was possible that we’d have at least some of electrification (Otahuhu to Britomart and Britomart to Morningside) completed, but then the government went and changed the funding structure for the project (which wasn’t necessarily a bad thing), and took a year to work out the details. This has meant that we’re likely to struggle to complete electrification by 2013, let alone 2011. We should have also taken the opportunity of the RWC to really do something about creating a proper transport interchange around Eden Park, so that the ground could handle a massive number of buses linking it with other parts of Auckland. Unfortunately, and rather stupidly, that was the first thing to get the chop when money got tight for the stadium upgrade.

Nick R, a regular commenter here, and on the Campaign for Better Transport Forums, details the “missed opportunity” (in transport terms at least) that this World Cup has been (taken from a post on the CBT forums):

It simply beggars belief that the powers that be have done basically nothing to prepare for the world cup except build a pedestrian underpass at Kingsland station, which in itself is only a token effort to manage what will be a serious safety issue due to the huge peak crowds attempting to use a small two track suburban commuter station.

Meanwhile all the rhetoric of ‘getting it done before the RWC’ has been used to justify over half a billion dollars of motorway works at Mangere and Victoria park, but surely not even the National party and NZTA actually believe that these works are needed for the cup. Even they must be aware that foreign tourists don’t bring their cars with them and any festival/event goers tend to use public transport anyway.

Typical Auckland, the opportunity to seriously improve the public transport system and urban environment to support a major international sporting festival, but instead half a billion is spent of freeways. And they are happy spending $390 million to add 12,000 mostly temporary seats and a fancy facade to Eden Park , yet the initially planned transport interchange around the No.2 ground was the first thing to be dropped when the penny pinching started.

Can you imagine what the primarily British and other European visitors are going to think when they arrive in Auckland and start figuring how to get to the stadium from their hotel?

Well at least they have several options:
-Catch a supremely overcrowded late train that is liable to catch on fire, be stuck at signals for half an hour, or otherwise never make it at all.
-Walk for 45 mins to an hour across a hilly, rainy, pedestrian unfriendly city, somehow finding their way around the central motorway junction and through suburban Mt Eden.
-Hire a car, drive it four kilometres through gridlock and try and find a park on the side of the road somewhere in Balmoral or Morningside.
-Catch a bus, sit in it for four kilometres of gridlock then be dropped off on the side of the road somewhere in the vicinity of the stadium.

Nevertheless, given the fact that while it’s satisfying to grumble about the stupidity of past decisions, it doesn’t really help us in the present, what can we do between now and September next year to – shall we say – improve the likeliness that we’ll ‘scrape by’? A few things come to mind.

Firstly, the integrated ticketing project simply has to be fully completed by then. Everything I have heard from ARTA suggests that the project will be ‘substantially progressed’ by the time of the World Cup – which means something very different to completed. It beggars belief that we can build the entire Victoria Park Tunnel project in less than two years, but can’t roll out an integrated ticketing system during the same time period. Ensuring ticketing simplicity for people who aren’t used to the public transport system will be one of the most important factors that determine how the transport system is seen by visitors – and by the world in general. I can easily imagine British newspapers laughing at the fact that their bus ticket covered travel on these four bus companies but not those other three, on some trains but not others, and perhaps on some ferries but they really weren’t sure. If there’s any transport project that needs to be completed by the time of the World Cup, it is integrated ticketing.

Secondly, we have to sort out the signalling and points issues that seem to be causing massive delays on the rail system on an almost weekly basis. One of the most disheartening aspects of these problems is that they often seem to happen to the newest parts of the system – Newmarket and Britomart. Now while I realise rail signalling is complicated, it’s clearly not impossible to get right. Considering that Tokyo shifts three times as many people on their train system in a day as Auckland shifts in a year, I don’t see their system being plagued by signalling failures all the time. So what we need to do is to absolutely 100% ensure that we have the best possible signalling system, that it’s well bedded in, that we’ve solved all the gremlins and – perhaps most importantly – that we have a Plan B for the times that something goes wrong. While we’re at it, how about a Plan C and a Plan D? Backups on backups on backups, I really don’t care how much redundancy there is in the system, one suspects that we’ll need it – because it is absolutely essential that nothing goes wrong for people travelling on the train from the city to Eden Park and back.

Thirdly, let’s create a “bus only” path between the CBD and Eden Park for match times. I don’t know what the best route would be – perhaps Sandringham Road, New North Road, Ian McKinnon Drive and then to Queen Street – but having such a route would make it fast and easy for people to travel between the city and the ground. You can also have a bus leaving every 20 seconds or so after the game, whereas the trains will only be coming and going every 5 minutes (which makes me wonder why we can’t have trains more frequently than that, probably Britomart’s lack of capacity again).

ARTA have made a press release saying that they are going to be ready for the RWC, and that they even have someone in a role dedicated to ensuring our public transport system is ready for this big event. I certainly do hope they’re right, and to be fair on ARTA a lot of the stuff-ups (like electrification) haven’t exactly been their fault.

Getting the signals and points right is KiwiRail’s job, creating a bus-only path between Eden Park and the city is probably Auckland City Council’s job (for now), but ensuring that integrated ticketing is finished is most certainly ARTA’s job between now and next September. I’m sure they could do it if they really tried, I mean heck – it’s not like we’re asking them to build a motorway tunnel or anything like that.

Share this

22 comments

  1. Well thanks for the quotation!

    In regard to the bus only path between Eden Park and the city, the obvious route is basically what you have mentioned.

    All it would require is:
    – Temporarily closing Bellwood Ave and/or Walters Rd to traffic for use as a bus loop/marshalling area
    – Bring forward construction of the first section of the proposed Dominion Rd bus lanes (currently scheduled to be built four years after the cup), with an extension of priority measures further north along Ian McKinnon Drive. This would actually be even easier than the first stage of the proposal, as the relatively expensive and tricky bus diversion around the Valley Rd shops would not be needed to service Eden Park.
    – Painting two of the four lanes of Queen St as buslanes (ummed and ahhed about for quite some time now…).

  2. In terms of game days it’s pretty easy to just close roads off completely. However, the thing with Rugby World Cups is that towards the end of the tournament you get a lot of days between games, and I expect the demand on PT over those times will be pretty intense too.

    Bringing forward the bus lanes makes a lot of sense.

  3. Some of the figures on the Arta press release are interesting. 9 trains will be used over a 70 min period with departures every 5 mins. That is a total of 14 trains so some of them will have to head back to Britomart for another run I presume. Also the current 4 car sets have about 260 seats, and obviously more standing space but 15000 passengers using 14 trains that is over 1000 people expected ot be on each train. 6 car sets might seat around 400 but that still leaves 600 standing which would be mighty cramped. I think there should also be services coming from south and heading West at Newmarket, they could mix inbetween the Britomart services to result in trains turning up at Kingsland every couple of minutes and also sort out the complaints from the Newmarket business association about trains not stopping there. Coming back after the game, one platform could go to town and the other Newmarket then out South.

    In terms of walking it isn’t as bad as some people have been making out. I used to live in town at the top of Symonds St and once walked to a game of criket with my wife. It took about 15-20 mins and we still beat the bus we were planning on catching (even after waiting about as long again for it to arrive due to traffic)

  4. Auckland will only have 38 trains at world cup time, all of which will be in use during the world cup. As a back up, Kiwi rail should send a bunch of Ganzs Mavag trains from Wellington as a back up (or even a replacement for the AK’s). Wellington are getting the new Matarangi trains, they will just be sitting around in the Wellington rail yards. As Auckland doesn’t have electrification, the trains could be pulled by Diesel locos.

    But it will look a bit shabby having Electric trains being pulled by Diesel locos, but due to a lack of investment, there are few options

  5. Those numbers show what a joke the idea of having the World Cup trains stop at Newmarket would be. The station can’t cope with the regular number of trains let alone having them plough through every 5 minutes. I agree some trains from the south should connect through to the west though – that would mean Newmarket gets at least a few trains.

    My parents live in Western Springs/Morningside so I used to walk to Eden Park for the matches. About a 10 minute walk. You always knew when there would be a good crowd as the cars stretched back to their place.

  6. In a way I almost hope for a complete failure and that NZ receives a trashing in the press for its shotsighted construction of brand-new motorways and 2 underpasses for PT. Joyce will of course respond that he is building transport infrastructure for “NZ’s future” and not for a single match but seeing him being shown for the incompetent inexperienced minister he is would bring a smile to my face.

  7. I agree with most the things you say, Jarbs, except on the timeline of the integrated ticketing. That is a HUGELY complex matter, rushing it will get us horrible stuff-ups for months or years.

    Sure,it should have been done long ago. But yeez, lets not stumble on this one, especially with Infratil waiting to pounce on any mishaps. We need this to go a bit more smoothly, and be a drawcard for PT.

    Not a “Oh, I heard that smartcard thing was really screwed up, eh? Still not working right half a year after they started it. That’s why I don’t use public transport – just too much of a hassle.” kind of excuse for the non-PT users not to try PT for once.

  8. I agree ingolfson that we don’t want to mess it up. Perhaps an intermediary “paper-based” integrated ticketing system until we have the smart-cards fully functional and operational?

  9. A simple solution to the ticketing, free transport any time during the cup for anyone bearing a ticket (i.e. cost of transport included in ticket price), and all game day trains and buses going to or from the stadium are free to the user.

    Basically ARTA could just contract the services at a flat rate.

  10. I’m guessing the normal train services will need to be seriously curtailed for the time of the rubgy world cup. This looks like it will only be a serious problem for the opening game which is the only one on a Friday, all others are on a Saturday or Sunday. Looks like games will start at 8pm, but will not be enough time to do any proper subbie runs.
    I would imagine the shuttle trains would start running at least 2 hours before the game, which would mean about 5.30pm. Maybe workers will be encouraged to finish early, or will be expected to hang around at ‘party central’, wherever that might be. I doubt there will be many buses left over either to run replacements.

  11. @Nick R – Joyce’s amendent to the PTMA next year will probably prevent ARTA (which won’t exist anymore in any case) from contracting all the services for the day. This is the last year that Auckland will actually have a PT agency, next year we’ll just have one for roads, so I’m not sure who will even be in charge of organising trains and buses….

  12. Wellington trains run on 1500VDC, Auckland’s will be 25kVAC – very incompatible so you can’t run trains from one on the other. Besides, Wellington will need their trains for their own RWC matches.

    If we get wires up quickly tho, maybe we could ask Perth very nicely if we could borrow a couple of theirs? 🙂

  13. Funnily enough, everyone seems to be focussing on how to transport 60,000 odd people to a couple of rugby matches over a couple of weeks but no one appears to be addressing the issue of how to keep ‘normal’ services operating during this massive disruption. If all 38 trains and all the buses, coaches and ferries are pressganged into servicing Eden Park what happens to the rest of the city’s transport needs or are we expected to glue ourselves to our televisions because, of course, you wouldn’t be a New Zealander if you didn’t fetishise rugby? Strikes me that expense aside, the only thing this wretched competition is going to do is to reveal just how decrepit our public transport infrastructure is, how venal our governance and how fundamentally amateur our planning processes, particularly in respect of pt, are.

  14. I’ve just started a new job. Since I live 2 minutes from the Mt Eden Station and my new job is 2 minutes from the Mt. Albert Station and I finish at 4pm, I thought it would be great summer fun & good exercise to catch the train from Mt Eden to Mt Albert and then walk home. The 7.41 am service is perfect – I get to the office three minutes before work start time.

    That is if the trains run on time. So far, the 7.41am train has been delayed or cancelled three out of the four times I’ve tried to use it. I now suspect the one time the 7.41am train arrived on time it was in fact the 7.31am train running ten minutes late. of course, I’ve given up on the trains now.

    If they can’t run a proper, reliable communter service in perfect summer weather and without large numbers of school children clogging the platforms then they’ve zero chance of coping with the RWC.

  15. The walkway seems the cheapest and most practicable solution. But since the new Auckland Transport Authority has no unit responsible for walkways or cycleways I’m not sure who will be able to organise construction.

  16. I predict a transportation meltdown…

    John Banks: “People can just walk, it’ll be a great walk through car fumes and interchanges..!”…

    PT meltdown + All Blacks loss = No more Joyce and likely no more National

  17. Why is it that Auckland’s train system is so unreliable – I mean seriously we have spent years upgrading it and it seems like the Western Line in particular just falls over at the slightest provocation. A few questions that need answering:

    1) What does it take to get a signalling system that actually works?
    2) What is the reason that signalling fails so often? Is it sub-standard equipment, incompetent staff, an overly complex system or something else entirely?
    3) Are backup plans adequate? What steps are put in place to ensure a minor meltdown doesn’t turn into a major meltdown?
    4) Are we using the best technology possible, or are we stuck using manual procedures that simply can’t cope with the number of trains we are putting through the system?

    Overseas cities manage to run decent rail systems – surely it’s not impossible.

  18. 1&2) Kiwirail has already said that the problem with Newmarket is the interface between new and old. That should be fixed when all the resignalling is complete.

    3) What back up plans?

    4) as per 1/2 above.

    Remember that a lot of overseas cities haven’t seen/allowed the massive run down of their systems in the way that NZ has allowed/encouraged it to happen here.

  19. I know no one is that interested, but after my train fiasco outlined above I decided this morning I would catch the 7.38am 211/213 bus to Mt.Albert. I got to the bus stop eight minutes early… And the bus never showed up.

    All the grand plans and all the grand schemes will come to nothing if a reliable, simple service of 6km along a main inner city arterial route is beyond Auckland’s regional transport infrastructure.

    I am driving to work from now on.

  20. New North Road buses are horribly unreliable for some reason. I think it’s probably the lack of bus lanes and the incredibly long route that some of the services (224 in particular) take. As I grew up in Western Springs/Morningside, New North Road buses were my lifeline into university and in general they were pretty rubbish.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *