Something definitely worth celebrating is the opening of the first section of Te Hā Noa, the Victoria St Linear Park. As we highlighted eight years ago, this project is vital for helping move the thousands of people that will pour out of the Te Waihorotiu station once the CRL opens. However, the project very nearly didn’t happen.
The first section of a redesigned Victoria Street – from Elliott Street to Queen Street – has opened to the public. It’s lighter and leafier. It feels more sociable. It functions with contemporary purpose, signposting more of what’s to come.
The milestone is another step closer to a completed station neighbourhood. Auckland Council’s midtown regeneration programme is ensuring the area will be ready for the City Rail Link (CRL) and Te Waihorotiu Station becoming operational in 2026.
The new rail network will bring thousands more people into these streets and spaces, using more transport modes than were previously available. People will arrive by rail, bus, active modes (walking or on scooters and bikes) and by car or delivery vehicle.This shift in functionality and lift in anticipated numbers underpin the need for the repurposing and redesign of streets and spaces, improving the workings of a contemporary city.
Fresh form and function
On both sides of the street, heritage kerb stones sit next to new paving. The flowing water patterning etched into basalt pavers on the southside of the street is by artists Chris Bailey and Sally Smith – hinting at a magnificent artwork coming to the Queen Street corner in mid-2025.
By that time, the Lorne Street to Albert Park section of Victoria Street will be open and CRL’s streetscape surrounding the station portal in Victoria Street will also be finished.
The mid-section of Victoria Street from Queen Street to Lorne Street will open in 2026, once Watercare’s Midtown Wastewater Upgrades are delivered. Read more about this work here and Auckland Council’s recent update here.
I get that it’s only a short section but it seems the cycleway is being blocked until more sections are finished. What’s the harm in letting people use it now?
The council are also talking up how the changes will enhance Christmas and summer in the city.
Uplighting the trees
When people come to enjoy Christmas lights in city centre squares and Queen Street this festive season, they will also see the uplighting of trees, widened footpaths, and spaces with new seating for visitors to sit and pause in this finished section of Victoria Street.
Visitors might also witness the first flowering of pōhutukawa which were among the native trees crane-lifted into the street in September. Pūriri, taraire and tītoki are the other varieties planted, with 900 plants further greening new gardens at street level. Read more here.
Policy and Planning Committee Chair Councillor Richard Hills says people have already been commenting on the new mature trees and gardens in the street, with places to sit and enjoy the city centre.
“The opening of the first section of Te Hā Noa has allowed people to start experiencing the refreshed atmosphere and functionality of the redesigned Victoria Street, which is truly exciting.
“I’m looking forward to our new streets and spaces, an underground rail network, better bus routes, billions of dollars of private sector investment in the area, and a thriving arts quarter, bordered by three beautiful city parks – Myers, Albert and Victoria.“Summer is going to be a wonderful time for people to experience these upgrades, including widened footpaths to stroll on and take in the new trees, which provide shade in the day and light up at night,” Councillor Hills says.
What has been delivered so far looks great and will only get better as more sections are completed.
However, it’s also worth remembering that we came very close to not having this. There’s a more complete summary of it here but despite this having been on the council’s City Centre Masterplan, part of AT’s strategic plans and the council having just reaffirmed it’s support for the project, Auckland Transport tried hard to prevent it following a secret deal done with the University of Auckland.
We thought our minds had finally been put to rest back in late March when the council reaffirmed their support for the City Centre Master Plan, including specifically calling out the Victoria St Linear Park. We thought this would be enough of a message to make AT think twice about scaling back the Linear Park. However, just days later, AT announced consultation for a plan which had a preferred option that not only killed the Linear Park but would also make it harder to use buses. What’s more, it appeared that part of the reason for this was a closed door deal done between AT and the University who don’t want buses past their premises, or even on the same side of the city as they are.
We later learnt that ATs own business case for the project didn’t support their preferred option. It showed, thanks to some poor redacting, that the preferred option was so bad for buses it had a negative benefit cost ratio while cheaper and more logical options performed well.
We, Generation Zero, Bike Auckland, Spinoff, and others encouraged people to submit to help save the Linear Park.
Late last week we finally learnt the outcome of the consultation with AT stating that they received more than 2,200 submissions, an impressive effort. Most importantly, as a result of the submissions, which they say showed “overwhelming public support for a more green and cycle/pedestrian-friendly city centre“, AT have abandoned their plans for buses on Victoria St and therefore the Linear Park is still alive.
We’re certainly not the only ones who helped save this but we’re proud of our efforts to keep this project alive and it’s fantastic to see it start to come to become a reality.
What about Wellesley St West?
Calling a footpath a ‘linear park’ is a victory for spin doctors and propagandists. The PR people involved in this must have a good chance at winning the Golden Tūtae in the Local Government category at the national awards this year. They might even pick up the Supreme Roke.
I was about to say the same thing! By “linear park” they meant “widish footpath with a few trees”.
Well, to be fair, it seems only the blog using the Linear Park name (because that’s what it started out as and people in (this) community knew the project as – the Council press release doesn’t use it (or call it a park) at all. So cool your outrage fellows.
The 2021 DBC said this section would cost $45 million, do we know what the final wash up was??..
Do we think its value for money??
(page 9)
https://progressakl.co.nz/media/ss4ctv44/_te-h%C4%81-noa-detailed-business-case-v4-0.pdf
Of course it is! It is only $375 million/km, so only a bit more expensive than the much maligned East West link ($327 m/km).
Absolutely right. Its oblique language like this which fuels suspicions among the public that all these projects amount to is a spaffing of money into consultant and civil service pockets.
To be fair though it will take a lot to beat Casey Costello for the Supreme Roke. She must be clear favourite.
It’s pretty peak Auckland for people to complain the street hasn’t got enough trees and greenery after almost a decade of trying to cancel it and then pushing for it to be all traffic lanes and parking.
A beautiful footpath and cycle path. Setting the standard.
But a park it is not.
I would really like to know who in the universities did not want busses on the premises. Did they want 40k students + staff to drive to campus?
The university administration (Auckland that is, AUT aren’t fools) is preoccupied with presenting some sort of Ivy League persona for the campus to attract international students. So they think buses are yucky and urban and for poor local kids who they don’t care about, so they don’t want them anywhere near the campus.
They literally do not care about how their students get there, because the internationals live on campus.
A few years back the chancellor said the closest any bus should come to Uni is Albert street.
So the full thing isn’t even ready until 2026 – a distance of what looks like about 100 or so m? Jesus christ things take so long. Close the street for a couple of months and just finish it.
I still appreciate the vision for it to connect all the way from Albert Park to Victoria Park.
That looks great .I wish the knockers would get over them selves .What would you rather have a nice multi use street or a road for trucks heading to the wharfs .If you lived where I do we could even deposit a load of stock effluent .
The out of control gravy train and debt arries on. I criminal is the only way to describe these projects and how much they cost while interest on debt is over 1.4 million per day. This isn’t being done for aucklanders, it’s being done to make the place look ok for tourists.
When the CRL opens it’s going to spew alot of foot traffic onto the streets, projects like this are going to help accommodate that increase in foot traffic, so yea, this is being done for Aucklanders and Tourists.
It wouldn’t make sense to have such narrow sidewalks given the shifting transport environment in the CBD
‘’”Visitors might also witness the first flowering of pōhutukawa which were among the native trees crane-lifted into the street in September.”
“They are beautiful but they are a pain in the neck.”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/118648644/phutukawa-cracking-pipes-and-paths-across-wellington
Agree. have these ‘ experts’ not seen a mature pohutukawa or done their research , same with a lot of their planting, they are not thinking of long term consequences. thats what happens when there is no accountability and you leave unhinged idealists to it, just creates costly issues, and they gravy train net work rides on https://www.virtualoceania.net/newzealand/photos/flora/pohutukawa/nz0161.shtml
They probably have them planted in root control housings, can’t think of the name, like they use for all these new urban plantings like near the waterfront.
Exactly, trees cause problems when they’re not housed in correctly built tree pits and don’t have enough soil volume.
I agree – the likelihood that this hasn’t been considered is… rather low. Sure, stuff ups happen. But the reality is that if some random people like us on a blog here do think of root damage to footpaths… you know, I kinda suspect that the people who design tree plantings and landscaping DO actually know about this too, folks.
Great that you guys have confidence that these people have considered this, but when we have people who are not that qualified making decisions, like planners whose main qual is art degree, I am not so sure. We have already seen they dont seem to know much about drainage, which you would presume was important, eg shops at Grey Lynn and multitude of other ‘ design’ improvements
” like planners whose main qual is art degree”.
Urban planning is an arts degree. I’m sure there is engineering consulting or whatever involved in these things too, it’s why it all costs to much.
Root barriers, that direct roots down, or are chemically treated to prevent roots from trying to pass through the barrier are used. Also, under the pavement, urban street trees are planted in tree trenches, allow for greater root runs and capacity for growth. Often with structural cells and engineered structural soils to allow over builds. Planners don’t deal with this. Landscape architects, Arborists and Engineers work closely together to ensure the wellbeing of the trees are secured, assets around the plantings, like pavements and pipes aren’t compromised. Pohutukawa trees in urban spaces are typically selected for their form i.e. single trunk, upright verses spreading etc. It is science, not art, but the outcome is artful.
Yes, Linear Park is a very STEM sounding idea, but as far as a decent footpath, with heavy protection from motorised vehicles, this first section is magnificent. Instead of less attractive concrete blocks and uplift able planters, alla High Street, we have integrated seating and gardens, while feeling protected from heavy machinery.
As a city centre resident, I have already toured my seven year old through the new section, and hopefully my almost five year old will be able to assess it soon too!
They should have closed the road to make the building process more efficient. Also why is it so dull and grey? Can’t we have nice coloured pavers?
People will give it the colour.
just wondering why they made cycle ways then put planter boxes on them?
So 22 seconds of the 33 second time lapse video is spent resurfacing the road on the other side of the ‘park’.